Barfo
Lifer
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,539
- 212
- 106
Yes, the closest you will get is the SB G620 (with 200 Mhz more frequency and an extra MB of L3 cache compared to SB G530 Celeron)
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/406?vs=190
why not?
Yes, the closest you will get is the SB G620 (with 200 Mhz more frequency and an extra MB of L3 cache compared to SB G530 Celeron)
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/406?vs=190
AMD Phenom II crush the Celeron.
I don't think a Celeron can even handle a 1080p video on youtube without the video and audio out of sync.
Please tell that to the Celeron G465 (single core with HT @ 1900MHz) in my "mini" media center. It handles youtube 1080p without any problems whatsoever. And according to perfmonitor the CPU usage is only ~15%...![]()
My worst memories and experiences with Intel have to do with the name "Celeron".
It makes as much sense as disabling hyperthreading in i5's even though the transistors are still there, or having HD2500's and HD4000's coming from the same die as well. I'm willing to bet that the vast majority (if not all) of the tiered parts are tiered simply for pricing and are not actually harvested parts.
I don't even see the Celery on Anandtech's Benchmark list. Where are these graphs being drawn up from?
AMD Phenom II crush the Celeron. I didn't say Sempron was any good, it's a poser as well.
Why are you benchmarking an AMD X2 550. I mean who really bought that chip... No one. :thumbsdown:
Build a Celery system better than Q8200 for under $450 bux with no OS and try to impress me.
you are linking a Pentium not a Celeron.Because you said any Phenom II X2 would outperform a Sandy Bridge-based Celeron. Point being, you were wrong.
Also, since you mentioned a Q8200, I decided to check. The Celeron G550 actually holds up pretty damn well against it. The Q8200 wins more often than not, but the fact a $50 CPU wins anything pretty well shows that it doesn't suck.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/52?vs=406
wow the Celery only supports ddr 1066? That's pathetic. Who would buy this joke of a chip!The Pentium G620 is identical to the Celeron G550, aside from 1 MB less of L3 cache.
http://ark.intel.com/products/53418/Intel-Celeron-Processor-G550-(2M-Cache-2_60-GHz)
http://ark.intel.com/products/53480/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G620-(3M-Cache-2_60-GHz)
The cache difference has no observable affect on performance, though. That isn't even the fastest Celeron, either. The G560 is faster than that Pentium.
The i3 crushes the Celeron. Celeron retails like $50 bux. The i3 goes on sale for $80.why in god's name are you morons feeding this troll?
what are you talking about it says it doesn't support ddr 1600.I have never seen an i3-3220 at $80. That's still almost twice as much as the Celeron costs, and it certainly isn't twice as fast. Even in absolutely absolutely conditions, the i3 won't perform more than 55% faster.
DDR3-1600 support is a non-issue. Any Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge CPU can run DDR3-1600. It doesn't improve performance at all, however.
why in god's name are you morons feeding this troll?