- Mar 18, 2004
- 6,883
- 0
- 71
I thought it had one of the best closures I've ever seen to a trilogy, although I was wondering wtf is the point to a couple of the scenes.
Originally posted by: DonVito
I actually don't think it's an awful movie, but it has to hold up against two of the greatest films ever made. It compares very poorly to the first two.
Originally posted by: saxguy
Originally posted by: DonVito
I actually don't think it's an awful movie, but it has to hold up against two of the greatest films ever made. It compares very poorly to the first two.
*gasp* Don Vito has spoken! :shocked:
Originally posted by: whoiswes
sure, it wasn't as good, but by no means did it suck.
episode III, however...
/cmon, you know it's gonna suck
Originally posted by: whoiswes
sure, it wasn't as good, but by no means did it suck.
episode III, however...
/cmon, you know it's gonna suck
Originally posted by: Yossarian
I liked it quite a bit. I thought Sofia was very attractive, plus it had Bridget Fonda who I always had a crush on. many powerful scenes, such as when Micheal confessed his sins.
yep. damn, winona ryder would've torn sophia's performance into shreds if she didnt fall ill.Originally posted by: Spamela
why? because Sofia Coppola gave the worst, most disappointing performance
by an actress in a "major" film in history.