I think that Dr. Paul, myself, and the rest of his supporters understand a lot more than most peopleNow I understand why the OP likes Ron Paul. He just doesn't get it. Ron Paul apparently just doesn't get it either.
I think that Dr. Paul, myself, and the rest of his supporters understand a lot more than most peopleNow I understand why the OP likes Ron Paul. He just doesn't get it. Ron Paul apparently just doesn't get it either.
From my perspective I would have to say that while I disagree with most of what the OP believes he doesn't go about saying things as if Zeus gave him free license to thunderbolt the internet. I allow considerable leeway to the opinions of those I do not accept if they can do so without formulating their responses in an adversarial way at least initially.
YMMV
From my perspective I would have to say that while I disagree with most of what the OP believes he doesn't go about saying things as if Zeus gave him free license to thunderbolt the internet. I allow considerable leeway to the opinions of those I do not accept if they can do so without formulating their responses in an adversarial way at least initially.
YMMV
Well, you have a point about Jim Crow (where the States forced segregation upon private property owners), but Dr. King advocated federal intervention.
There is a difference between disagreeing with someone over a political topic, and outright rejecting their argument because it has no basis in reality.
90+% of Anarchists posts fall into the latter category.
I don't think I've indicated an acceptance of his ideas. My point is a personal one and that it easier for me to make a constructive comment if the OP doesn't attempt to distract me with angry emotional content. Not a whole lot to read into it. I guess different people can shrug off different things.
I never said you or anyone else had to listen to meso ? what kind of anarchist are you if you favor state's rights ? Why is that entity entitled to interfere with individuals ?
not to mention, why do you even post ? if you think individuals aren't supposed to be governed, what is the point of sharing your opinion ? Everyone's supposed to do what they want, not listen to each other..
Because he was a leader of the Civil Rights Movement. You know, that thing that got people actual rights besides just the right to be fucked by those more powerful than themselves, like you anarcho-libertarians are obsessed with.
The one thing the OP has demonstrated is the ineptitude of his school district and their history ciriculum.
Either that or he lived in one of those school districts where they purchased history books that tought MLK was nothing but an uppity troublemaker.
Actually, I don't recall doing modern history in High School which was so long ago. You just have one and half year of history in high school where I live. There is a year of geography, then history for 3 semesters and government for 3 semesters.The one thing the OP has demonstrated is the ineptitude of his school district and their history ciriculum.
Either that or he lived in one of those school districts where they purchased history books that tought MLK was nothing but an uppity troublemaker.
I never said you or anyone else had to listen to me
I'm an anarcho capitalist/anarcho-individualist and the 14th Amendment is statist (most anarcho-capitalists would rather have states' rights than centralization of power). I never said that the States are entitled to interfere with individuals, but it's even worse to have the Federal government enforce peoples' rights. Anarchists want as many sovereigns as possible preferrably every individual a sovereign. If there is only one sovereign (whether it's a world republic or a world monarchy) over 7 billion people subjects, then there will absolutely be tyranny.
On behalf of all of AT I am here to award the OP, Captain Arizona, with the facepalm award.
I think that Dr. Paul, myself, and the rest of his supporters understand a lot more than most people![]()
Yes, the dead civil rights activist who convinced a lot of angry people that peaceful resistence was the correct solution.
He advocated redistribution of wealth and he advocated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, so I don't get why he's so popular. People can get locked up if they refuse to follow a Federal quota system or if they refuse to serve people they may not want to serve.
I don't dislike him, as he spoke out against the Vietnam war and was a good man, but why do so many people hold him in such high regard?
My point is, is that if you're not an anarcho-capitalist, then you advocate aggression.
Wait. You are asking why there is a holiday for one of most influential people in history? Are you serious? I'm befuddled and don't know what else to say.....
Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia and Mississippi all celebrate Robert E Lee day. Also known as Dog-whistle Racism day.
