Why do you build houses out of wood?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: sygyzy
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
Because we Americans love to chop down forests which provide us oxygen and protect wildlife all for the sake housing developments. And brick is an old school home design. I would imagine it doesn't insulate very well.

Which is funny, because an ever increasing amount of lumber used today is from trees specifically planted for the purpose of cutting them down.

That is really a dumb argument. Would you say there are more trees and more forests in the US now or 200 years ago? 100 years ago? Not only pure numbers, but the quality and age of trees? It's akin to saying "Oh slavery isn't an issue because now we rape women for the purpose of producing child laborers"

That is one of the dumbest statements I've seen here in awhile, and that takes some trying.
 

Fullmetal Chocobo

Moderator<br>Distributed Computing
Moderator
May 13, 2003
13,704
7
81
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
Have none of you pups ever heard the expression, "built like a brick ****house"? ;)

My parents house was build ~1870-1880, and it's built like a brick shit house despite being build out of wood. The stuff is so heat treated at this point, some of it is closer to petrified wood. Replacing the electrical wiring there sucked.
 

wetcat007

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2002
3,502
0
0
Originally posted by: NoShangriLa
Originally posted by: wetcat007
I'm not really sure why more homes are built of wood in the US. I would think there's benefits to brick as well as benefits to using wood. It would be interesting to see how well brick or cement insulates compared to the fiberglass insulation used in wood structure homes. Both building types seem to work and last fine...

Could part of it be there's few pine trees in Australia, while they are abundant in the US?

Would be really interesting to see good comparison of wood vs brick structures.
R-Value Table

R-value

Standard wood construction R value is 4-10 times greater than concrete/brick construction.

So that would show a very good reason for using wood over using brick in construction then... score 1 for wood, bricks 0 lol
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
Originally posted by: BradAtWork
Hi Americans.

If i'm generalising please correct me, but from TV/Films it appears most of your free standing homes are made of wood?

Why is this. Can most people not afford to build out of brick?

Where I come from (Australia) only older/low cost homes were built from wood.

Brick homes last longer and I imagine would maintain temperature better.

Is it just the abudance of cheap wood you have in the states, or is it just tradition or whatever.

Just curious.

why wood or brick? aluminum FTW!
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Bricks are probably the number one worst building material in earthquakes.

Occasionally people put up bricks on top of the wood, purely for style. They are not considered a viable structural element, period.

yea single layer fake wall for appearance.
real brick is a very thick wall...bad earthquake stuff, let alone if you try for a second story.
 

bobsmith1492

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2004
3,875
3
81
There are tons of brick houses in Michigan and tons of wood houses with a lot being a mix of the two. However, there isn't much brick available in some parts of the country so it usually comes down to cost and appearance. Some people don't like brick.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
Because we Americans love to chop down forests which provide us oxygen and protect wildlife all for the sake housing developments. And brick is an old school home design. I would imagine it doesn't insulate very well.

Which is funny, because an ever increasing amount of lumber used today is from trees specifically planted for the purpose of cutting them down.

If you think a tree farm is environmentally friendly, you are sorely mistaken.

And of course a lot of wood comes from national forests, at very low royalty costs to the lumber companies. You can go 5 miles from Yellowstone, and in the Beartooths, one of the most beautiful places I have seen, there is logging.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Earthquake prone areas aside, I've also wondered for a while why everything is made of such flimsy easy-to-go-up-in-flames-shredded-by-a-tornado-wood instead of more durable and sturdy concrete or brick.

Where I grew up (outside the US) all houses were made from cement/concrete/bricks. I much prefer a real cement/brick wall to the flimsy drywall over wood beams, but I simply could not affort to build my house that way here.

I guess that's the reason, it's much more expensive here to build brick/concrete than it is to build using cheap wood.
 

grrl

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2001
6,204
1
0
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: sygyzy
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
Because we Americans love to chop down forests which provide us oxygen and protect wildlife all for the sake housing developments. And brick is an old school home design. I would imagine it doesn't insulate very well.

Which is funny, because an ever increasing amount of lumber used today is from trees specifically planted for the purpose of cutting them down.

That is really a dumb argument. Would you say there are more trees and more forests in the US now or 200 years ago? 100 years ago? Not only pure numbers, but the quality and age of trees? It's akin to saying "Oh slavery isn't an issue because now we rape women for the purpose of producing child laborers"

That is one of the dumbest statements I've seen here in awhile, and that takes some trying.

QFT. But I'll also add....

Originally posted by: Colt45
The same reason american cars last 5 years.

 

ISAslot

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2001
2,891
108
106
Around here I don't think there are any houses that have a structure made of brick. For new houses, most are wood. There are a few that are using foam forms and then pouring in concrete for the structure. In the 60's and 70's they used concrete block, but not much anymore.

Commercial structures however use a lot of concrete block, poured concrete/steel, and steel.

Brick is used as a decorative facade.

In the early 20th century our commercial buildings were made of brick though.
 

bobsmith1492

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2004
3,875
3
81
Originally posted by: grrl
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: sygyzy
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Cdubneeddeal
Because we Americans love to chop down forests which provide us oxygen and protect wildlife all for the sake housing developments. And brick is an old school home design. I would imagine it doesn't insulate very well.

Which is funny, because an ever increasing amount of lumber used today is from trees specifically planted for the purpose of cutting them down.

That is really a dumb argument. Would you say there are more trees and more forests in the US now or 200 years ago? 100 years ago? Not only pure numbers, but the quality and age of trees? It's akin to saying "Oh slavery isn't an issue because now we rape women for the purpose of producing child laborers"

That is one of the dumbest statements I've seen here in awhile, and that takes some trying.

QFT. But I'll also add....

Originally posted by: Colt45
The same reason american cars last 5 years.

Mine's a 20 years old Ford that I've had for 6, what does that mean?
 

bobsmith1492

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2004
3,875
3
81
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
If you think a tree farm is environmentally friendly, you are sorely mistaken.
There are some where I live. How are they bad?

'Cause trees hurt the environment, silly. :p
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
If you think a tree farm is environmentally friendly, you are sorely mistaken.
There are some where I live. How are they bad?

They're as bad as any farm. A tree farm is a single age monoculture with very little ecological value, that replaces a natural forest. A lot of water and fertilizer is used to grow trees quickly. "Planting a tree" sounds good to hippies, but is not necessarily good.

http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/CTW/TreeFarm.jpeg
(That pic is from here... interesting article http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/CTW.html)

http://www.heritageplantations.com/Farm.jpg

http://brennertreefarm.hypermart.net/farmphoto.jpg
 

jaqie

Platinum Member
Apr 6, 2008
2,471
1
0
They aren't as good for the environment as a natural forest, but compared to the alternative (harvesting natural forests) they are about as perfect as we can get. Nobody seems to complain about corn fields and the like, and this is basically the same thing, growing and harvesting resources for ourselves.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
If you think a tree farm is environmentally friendly, you are sorely mistaken.
There are some where I live. How are they bad?

They're as bad as any farm. A tree farm is a single age monoculture with very little ecological value, that replaces a natural forest. A lot of water and fertilizer is used to grow trees quickly. "Planting a tree" sounds good to hippies, but is not necessarily good.

http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/CTW/TreeFarm.jpeg
(That pic is from here... interesting article http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/CTW.html)

http://www.heritageplantations.com/Farm.jpg

http://brennertreefarm.hypermart.net/farmphoto.jpg
Interesting. I live in southern georgia.

Trees are going to be harvested from somewhere. I'd rather cut trees from a tree farm for the paper and building industries than virgin forests. There are pine species that can be harvested for pulp in as little as 15 years from seedlings. Trees grown for lumber take 20-25 years. Talk about long range farming...
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: jaqie
They aren't as good for the environment as a natural forest, but compared to the alternative (harvesting natural forests) they are about as perfect as we can get. Nobody seems to complain about corn fields and the like, and this is basically the same thing, growing and harvesting resources for ourselves.

There are other alternatives, like synthetic wood made from recycled plastic.
 

jaqie

Platinum Member
Apr 6, 2008
2,471
1
0
Ohh, there's a good one, synthetic plastic. As if oil was a renewable resource and we had an infinite supply! Most plastics are made partly or wholly from oils, even synthetics - that is, the ones that are not designed to break down in a few years. Those are made from grains, and the process is not near as efficient as growing the pine itself. So we replace treefarms with more corn farms to get material for biosynthetic plastic?
The biggest problem with those is not that, though - it is the cost of making the plastic versus making pine lumber in treefarms.
 

Casawi

Platinum Member
Oct 31, 2004
2,366
1
0
I wondered the same thing when I moved here. No one builds homes from wood, but in states man ... its take like one semester to get a house us, sometime they even hall them in trucks and just drop them somewhere and put in a few nails ...lol
There a lot of interesting things in this place.
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Originally posted by: BradAtWork
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
uhhh...

well, in california, you cant build brick buildings because of earthquake codes

Good point, I didn't think of that.

We just avoid earthquakes.

How do you avoid them? Duck?

Its not the price, but the labor, that makes brick building so expensive. A house made of brick would likely take three times as much time to build. A house with stick walls that can ultimately last 40 years is good enough. Also, you could imagine that changes which might need to be made based on the preference of the owners would be more difficult.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: jaqie
Ohh, there's a good one, synthetic plastic. As if oil was a renewable resource and we had an infinite supply! Most plastics are made partly or wholly from oils, even synthetics - that is, the ones that are not designed to break down in a few years. Those are made from grains, and the process is not near as efficient as growing the pine itself. So we replace treefarms with more corn farms to get material for biosynthetic plastic?
The biggest problem with those is not that, though - it is the cost of making the plastic versus making pine lumber in treefarms.

Well tree farms are of course a lot better than virgin forests or even secondary growth but pretty mature forest.

They use fertilizer, made with oil, for tree farms anyway.

I bet there is enough existing plastic to recycle into lumber to build every American house for a long time. It may be less expensive.. a plastic table costs less than a wood one. Stop letting loggers use the national forests for pennies, and the value of wood will rise.
 

waffleironhead

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,064
570
136
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I notice everyone seems to have a pine fetish. I know a lot of areas used to focus on pine framing, but now you're just as likely to find fir or any number of other woods. Not a biggie, just thought I'd toss that out there.

That is why most lumber is rated as SPF(spruce,pine,fir).