Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: NeoPTLD
Many cordless phone and electric toothbrushes uses NiCd to these days. My Sonicare instruction recommends putting it on charger after each use.
I don't find any reference about modern NiCd batteries being immune from memory effect and I think its unavoidable with NiCd technology.
Why do they still recommend you to charge it after each use?
Cordless....maybe some of the 900Mhz/2.4GHz things do; cellphones use Li-ion, at least mine does. I imagine that a lot of companies might use Nicad either to get rid of old inventory, or else because it's cheaper. NiMH should be replacing NiCad; that's what I've done at home. Much better lifetime, and they can charge faster. Heck, I even ripped apart my ailing Dustbuster and replaced its NiCad batteries with NiMH's, and it runs much longer than it did when it was new.
This "memory effect" is sounding more like a renamed version of either "overcharging" or "deep discharge."
I don't recall my Sonicare instructions recommending recharging after each use. My handles (include the batteries), have a feature where when they reach the state where they require recharging, they beep for several seconds at the end of a particular 2-minute usage. That alerts me that recharging is required, and then I do not use that handle again until I do recharge it. I think I get around 25 2-minute brush cycles (once a day) on a single charge. It happens that I have two handles, so when this happens I charge the_other_handle (it takes about 22 hours to charge, so it's ready when I do my daily brushing next day). Both handles seem to me to be in fine shape, and it's been about 5 years since I bought this set, and always used this regimen.
The current use of Nicads cannot be solely attributed to the corporations wanting to move out antiquated technology in lieu of supplying superior NiMH's (or Li-ion's). Nicads do not lose their charge as fast as NiMH, for instance. If you have a device that you don't use all the time, it may indeed run down much more from the attrition affect than from actual tool usage. I don't know the figures, but these batteries lose their stored energy around 1% a day, but Nicads definitely lose their energy in this manner quite a bit slower than NiMH's, I'm told. NiMH's are more expensive, so that's one reason to go with Nicads, but I also lean toward Nicads in a situation where I don't use the tool frequently. NiMH's give about 60% more energy before they need recharging (sometimes more, I think), not counting the faster shelf power loss factor. All these factors come into consideration when you are choosing a battery. Nicads used to have the memory effect, but that's said to be mostly history.
Another thing to consider is that modern Nicads evidently are apt to last longer than NiMH's. I've seen claims that certain NiMH's might be rechargeable up to 1000 times, but usually they claim up to 300 times. Nicads, I believe, are thought to be rechargeable a fair amount more than NiMH's, at least the newer ones.