• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why do space ships shake when fired upon?

her209

her209

No Lifer
Take the Star Trek: The Next Generation, for example. While at red alert, you see the bridge shake (sometimes violently) when it gets hit by enemy fire. Should it do that since there's no gravity? And, yes, I know that there's gravity inside the ship.
 
her209 said:
Take the Star Trek: The Next Generation, for example. While at red alert, you see the bridge shake (sometimes violently) when it gets hit by enemy fire. Should it do that since there's no gravity? And, yes, I know that there's gravity inside the ship.
Click to expand...

Then you answered your own question. Now if we can just figure out how all those explosion sounds we hear are being transmitted in a vacuum.

/thread
 
Linflas said:
Now if we can just figure out how all those explosion sounds we hear are being transmitted in a vacuum.
Click to expand...
Of course, when the ship's hit, the sound is being transmitted through the ship's hull, and inside of it there IS air...so you hear sound.

...Or it could just be for dramatic effect, along with the flames and sparks flying out of their instrument consoles. Take your pick.
 
TV sci-fi is terrible sci-fi. don't think too much about it.

but concussive forces from weapon impact/explosions would shake the ship a bit no?
 
What the hell does gravity have anything to do with vibrations? Ever hear of inertia? Kinetic energy? Assuming the projectile has some kind of mass, it will transfer its kinetic energy to the ship. It's the basic premise behine virtually every weapon since the dawn of life. Throw a rock, cause damage.
 
Last edited:
Shaking of the space ship implies that the ship is being acted upon two or more forces in different directions, no?
 
Well, the ships are being hit by a force (the weapons), my guess is that the energy from the force would be transferred to the ship in some manner and since there is no gravity it would actually have more impact on the ship than it would with gravity.
 
her209 said:
Shaking of the space ship implies that the ship is being acted upon two or more forces in different directions, no?
Click to expand...

areas of the ship may oscillate from an abrupt momentum changes. compensation from thrusters may cause shaking. dramatic effects demand this.
 
Because hollywood sucks at anything beyond art. Even when they get physics right, they usually find a way to make it oh so wrong.
 
I think a better question is how do inertial dampeners get you from 0 ft/sec to several times the speed of light and back without so much as a shake but they can't prevent the shaking when they get hit by a laser.
 
why did the ships drop down before they took off into space in wing commander? there shouldnt have been any gravity to pull them down when they left the flight deck
 
KB said:
I think a better question is how do inertial dampeners get you from 0 ft/sec to several times the speed of light and back without so much as a shake but they can't prevent the shaking when they get hit by a laser.
Click to expand...

You know when they say "divert all energy from non critical systems..." ... yea that's the inertial dampers 😛
 
Because space combat scenes that tried to make an even vague attempt to follow the laws of physics would be very, very boring.
 
these type of shows were designed for entertainment, not scientific accuracy.

If they were to be scientifically accurate it would be pretty boring since no object can exceed the speed of light. Not to mention the fact you can't see a beam weapon in space.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top