• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why do screen pics have to be rectangular?

IronWing

No Lifer
Seems silly and arbitrary to require pics to be rectangular. Yes, we can make pics appear to be other shapes by making regions transparent but why not make those regions not be there in the first place? The extra storage space required to define an irregular canvas ain't that much.
 
It's easier to store and process stuff in a system of x/y coordinates.

This.

It's a result of the underlying data structure which boils down to a matrix

the extra memory and processing power costs required to mathematically define and handle a non-rectangular shape would far outweigh any benefits.
 
This.

It's a result of the underlying data structure which boils down to a matrix

the extra memory and processing power costs required to mathematically define and handle a non-rectangular shape would far outweigh any benefits.

This. Plus from a physical standpoint it's the most efficient use of space for delivering consistent information. You can stack rectangles in neat rows and columns. Any stacked round shape is going to have a lot of wasted blank space, and any other geometric shape is going to be at best on par with the rectangle in terms of surface area but will still be harder to make/arrange.
 
This.

It's a result of the underlying data structure which boils down to a matrix

the extra memory and processing power costs required to mathematically define and handle a non-rectangular shape would far outweigh any benefits.

x/y does seem considerably more performant than radians and distance from center for something like a circular display. Thinking of CSS for a circular display makes my head hurt.
 
You could use polar coordinates - it takes the same amount of information per data point. However, the pixels wouldn't all be the same size.
 
i tried to make a round one

BzsQX6Z.png
 
Displays are most efficient if rectangular, or some other tessellating pattern, but rectangles are most efficient for dividing up.
So displays end up as rectangles. So images for those displays are rectangles.
A few bits here or there on an image isn't particularly meaningful anymore.
 
because the human eye sees in a rectangular aspect ratio
Not top mention that the human vision system in terms of the retina is much less sensitive to horizontal resolution than vertical and why compression or extrapolation of data takes place more on that axis than the other.

We happily anamorphic material because of this human condition. But if the OP wants to change it then turn the capture device sideways and get on with life.
 
well... that's it

the internet has run out of things to complain about now that somebody takes issue with what geometrical shape pictures are displayed in
 
Back
Top