TheLonelyPhoenix
Diamond Member
- Feb 15, 2004
- 5,594
- 1
- 0
Once again, I feel compelled to cement my place in history with a post in a truly epic ATOT thread.
- Status
I defend certain aspects of religion, sure. I suppose you were brainwashed to troll it?
JMapleton
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2008
- 4,179
- 2
- 81
Atheists arguing about religion is like fish arguing about a barren desert. You cannot argue about something that you cannot comprehend.
Philosophically there are many questions that are unanswered in why we exist, why we are who we are, how we came to be, and our self conscious. To put down someone because they believe in a Higher Power is ridiculous unless you have these answers, and believe me, you do not.
Philosophically there are many questions that are unanswered in why we exist, why we are who we are, how we came to be, and our self conscious. To put down someone because they believe in a Higher Power is ridiculous unless you have these answers, and believe me, you do not.
IcePickFreak
Platinum Member
- Jul 12, 2007
- 2,428
- 9
- 81
Quoted from the AT Garage for lulz
That thread goes on with the OP requesting a 20,000lb towing capacity as well. D:
The real question here is did the OP sleep through engineering schooling, or excel at troll schooling? Ok, no it isn't, that answer is pretty obvious.
That thread goes on with the OP requesting a 20,000lb towing capacity as well. D:
The real question here is did the OP sleep through engineering schooling, or excel at troll schooling? Ok, no it isn't, that answer is pretty obvious.
DominionSeraph
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 8,386
- 32
- 91
Nothing a posteriori is certain. That does not make all related beliefs reasonable.
Nice try, though.
Oh, and don't use, "Philosophically." Your word would be, "Retardedly."
DangerAardvark
Diamond Member
- Oct 22, 2004
- 7,559
- 0
- 0
I'm in complete agreement. Atheists' naive understanding of Unicorns shames only themselves. Only those versed in sophisticated Unicornology may comment intelligently.
RocksteadyDotNet
Diamond Member
- Jul 29, 2008
- 3,152
- 1
- 0
Thanks, I was about to write something like that.
You put it much more eloquently than I could.
mjrpes3
Golden Member
- Oct 2, 2004
- 1,876
- 1
- 0
After following this thread, I can't help but notice there must be some recursive trolling going on here.
Let me explain...
Your most simple troll exchange is "Troll A baits Victim A", a statement which for simplicity can be referred to as Troll Exchange of Dimension 1 (TD1).
But for all we know the victim could really be the troll: "Troll B is personifying Victim A who is trolling TD1" (TD2).
There is no reason the series couldn't continue indefinitely...
(Troll A' personifies Troll A who trolls TD2) = TD3
(Troll B' personifies Troll B who trolls TD3) = TD4
(Troll A'' personifies Troll A' who trolls TD4) = TD5
...
I'm sure some smart math folks could prove some laws of trolling using structural induction, but from what I've seen so far we must be at troll dimension of 3, possibly higher.
Let me explain...
Your most simple troll exchange is "Troll A baits Victim A", a statement which for simplicity can be referred to as Troll Exchange of Dimension 1 (TD1).
But for all we know the victim could really be the troll: "Troll B is personifying Victim A who is trolling TD1" (TD2).
There is no reason the series couldn't continue indefinitely...
(Troll A' personifies Troll A who trolls TD2) = TD3
(Troll B' personifies Troll B who trolls TD3) = TD4
(Troll A'' personifies Troll A' who trolls TD4) = TD5
...
I'm sure some smart math folks could prove some laws of trolling using structural induction, but from what I've seen so far we must be at troll dimension of 3, possibly higher.
IcePickFreak
Platinum Member
- Jul 12, 2007
- 2,428
- 9
- 81
Are you seriously going to bring this into a troll thread that wasn't even about religion until a random comment by the troll suggesting the Bible was written in the year 0? That's who your going to back up? D:
eits
Lifer
eits
Lifer
RocksteadyDotNet
Diamond Member
- Jul 29, 2008
- 3,152
- 1
- 0
Born2bwire
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2005
- 9,840
- 6
- 71
SphinxnihpS
Diamond Member
- Feb 17, 2005
- 8,368
- 25
- 91
JTsyo
Lifer
- Nov 18, 2007
- 12,038
- 1,135
- 126
I don't think the OP's question has been answered correctly before the trolling started.
If you want to find the area of a square, you square (x^2) it's dimension.
If you want to find the volume of a cube, you cube (x^3) it's dimension.
Now we return you to your troll posts.
If you want to find the area of a square, you square (x^2) it's dimension.
If you want to find the volume of a cube, you cube (x^3) it's dimension.
Now we return you to your troll posts.
The Bible as it stands today is not 2010 years old (it also depends which version of the bible you are reading). Perhaps you should read up about the history of the book you hold so near and dear to your beliefs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Christian_Biblical_canon
Actually, there is no such thing as "year 0" in the Gregorian calendar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(year)
Also, how did humananity manage to not wipe itself out for the ~300,000 years prior to your "year 0" (i.e. 1 BC or 1 AD)? By your reasoning, the only reason not to kill one another is because the Bible says not to. How did Greece, Egypt, the Aztecs, etc all manage to build these massive societies before the Bible was even created?
SagaLore
Elite Member
- Dec 18, 2001
- 24,036
- 21
- 81
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter