I realized this also back in the 920 days...
but no one seems to listen to me. :T
I realized this also back in the 920 days...
but no one seems to listen to me. :T
ummm my 920 days means the rest of you guys were still stuck on lga775.
:X
When you guys got 920's i was on a 975.
Like how when people got on a 975, i went gulftown.
Jethro Tull reference FTW. I can only use 19x or 21x , and with 8x memory I can only use 17x uncore. 16x doesn't boot.Hmmm we're still in the 920 days!
Looks at 980X plugged into same socket fitting 920s.
Yep we're living in the past with thoughts thick as a brick while we bungle in the jungle!
Sorry cannot help it when I hear Ian's flute!![]()
I'm running 182x22 on an i7 860 ATM, with Vcore set to 1.26875v. Never any problems with the even multi's.
I can't say that I've noticed any issues running either 210x20 or 200x21 on 3x i7 920 D0s (all same batch/step code/pack date on EX58-UD3Rs).
Yup, I know what he meant. I ran the exact same voltage for both configs.what he meant was that it takes a higher amount of voltage to be stable at the same frequency on an even multiplier than an odd one.
I am pretty sure the answer is engineering based in nature -- in other words requires actual knowledge of how multipliers interact with the particular architecture in place. I actually thought that Core 2 Duo/Quad architecture overclocked better with odd multis as well - is this true too?
Any Intel engineers here?
I wonder whether it's got anything to do with the loop response from the relevant phase locked loops, since changing the multiplier does change the loop gain.Yes that's what I'm looking for. Specifically if equipment is attached to the motherboard what signals should one be looking at?
