Originally posted by: daniel1113
The difference being that Apple products are produced to high quality standards using top of the line technology. Bose is expensive without any quality.
Originally posted by: RBachman
.. the only difference being Apple markets a young, hip image while Bose advertises to the middle aged status seeking crowd. Discuss.
Apple has something like 80% of the market, so even if they break half as often as other players you'd still see twice as many "it brrokenz!" posts.Originally posted by: RBachman
Considering the lauded "Apple Quality", I sure seem to see a lot of "O NOEZ my ipod broke!!" posts here.. and on ipodlounge.. Please don't make the "but other players break too" argument after making the "the money buys you a player that breaks less" argument.
Originally posted by: daniel1113
The difference being that Apple products are produced to high quality standards using top of the line technology. Bose is expensive without any quality.
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
People here love Apple? That's news to me.
Originally posted by: Rastus
Only people who do not optimise their Bose installation with Monster Cables are unhappy with them.
Kind of like the relationship that Apple and AOL have.
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
you might want to look up Yoyodajello on the Bose.
Many of the best transducers available today use paper cones.Originally posted by: jiwq
bose uses space age paper cone technology. they don't need high quality parts as long as all their parts were space-age at some point in history
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
People here love Apple? That's news to me.
people love ipods thats about it
