Why do I need the "Java Virtual Machine"?

transluko

Member
Sep 15, 2002
99
0
0
I have XP. Why isn't it already installed? I keep getting the message that I need to download it but the link given never works.

Micro$oft sucks so much!
 

arod

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2000
4,236
0
76
I get the same thing on my laptop but never could find something to install to put it on.... My desktop has it but my laptop doesnt even they were isntalled from teh same CD.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
maybe you didn't intstall it w/ windows. when do you get this message
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
java virtual machine, is what allows you to use java. without it java will not work. go to java.sun.com and download sun's jvm.

the lawsuit by sun against MS is why winxp did not come with a jvm.
 

BCYL

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
7,803
0
71
There was a battle a while along between MS and Sun, so MS cut support for Java from it's products...

That thing is settled now, so you can again download Java support for winXP...
 

transluko

Member
Sep 15, 2002
99
0
0
the message occurs when it's trying to load java stuff, of course. i'll try downloading from the sun site.
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
I have a hard time understanding how this is a M$ problem.

SUN owns JAVA, not MS.
:p
 

Mrburns2007

Platinum Member
Jun 14, 2001
2,595
0
0
First SUN sued to get Java in Windows then they sued to get JAVA out of Windows. To funny.


Basically M$ doesn't want to pay SUN for the linsense so now we all have to use the crappy SUN Java. Java is the first thing from microsoft that was basically small and efficient compared with a competing product.

 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,893
544
126
Why do I need the "Java Virtual Machine"?
You have made an unauthorized inquiry. If you continue to make unauthorized inquiries questioning the necessity of a Microsoft product or component, I will have no choice but to report you to Microsoft's Department of Product Education, Acceptance, and Conformity. There, you will be sent and held against your will, subjected to re-education measures until you no longer demonstrate a propensity to question the necessity or usefulness of any Microsoft product or component.
 

fr

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
6,408
2
81
I tried Sun's Java and my comp would freeze for 3 seconds each time I went to a site that had Java.


Back to Virtual Machine.
 

fluxquantum

Platinum Member
Oct 27, 2000
2,398
1
71
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Why do I need the "Java Virtual Machine"?
You have made an unauthorized inquiry. If you continue to make unauthorized inquiries questioning the necessity of a Microsoft product or component, I will have no choice but to report you to Microsoft's Department of Product Education, Acceptance, and Conformity. There, you will be sent and held against your will, subjected to re-education measures until you no longer demonstrate a propensity to question the necessity or usefulness of any Microsoft product or component.

uhhh...ooookay.
 

PrincessGuard

Golden Member
Feb 5, 2001
1,435
0
0
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
First SUN sued to get Java in Windows then they sued to get JAVA out of Windows. To funny.


Basically M$ doesn't want to pay SUN for the linsense so now we all have to use the crappy SUN Java. Java is the first thing from microsoft that was basically small and efficient compared with a competing product.

To be fair to Sun, the MS JVM is "small and efficient" because it is based on an ancient version of Java that Sun made obsolete almost 2 years ago. Some pretty major changes and additions have happened since then.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: PrincessGuard
Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
First SUN sued to get Java in Windows then they sued to get JAVA out of Windows. To funny.


Basically M$ doesn't want to pay SUN for the linsense so now we all have to use the crappy SUN Java. Java is the first thing from microsoft that was basically small and efficient compared with a competing product.

To be fair to Sun, the MS JVM is "small and efficient" because it is based on an ancient version of Java that Sun made obsolete almost 2 years ago. Some pretty major changes and additions have happened since then.

Does that mean that programs written for Java 1.4.1 can't be run with the JVM?
 

NetworkDad

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2001
3,435
1
0
Java stuff always took forever to load using sun's version for me. Once i upgraded to XP, uninstalled sun, and chose MS vm, all Java loads much quicker.
 

michaelh20

Senior member
Sep 4, 2000
482
0
0
>> Does that mean that programs written for Java 1.4.1 can't be run with the JVM?

Can't be run with the MicroSquash version, which I think is version 1.1, or so...

Part of the slow down with browsers is that they are using plugins and not the native VM in the browsers (like they used to have for 1.0 and 1.1 versions). I don't much care for the Java Plugin myself. I wish Sun had just made this a compiling language, and then it wouldn't be so sllllllloooooooowwww..
 

KeyserSoze

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2000
6,048
1
81
Quick question. I'm not sure about this, and it's why I'm asking.


Didn't Sun sue MS because they didn't represent Java properly in MS J++. Like using MS API's in their Dev?

Just Wondering.




KeyserSoze
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Originally posted by: KeyserSoze
Quick question. I'm not sure about this, and it's why I'm asking.


Didn't Sun sue MS because they didn't represent Java properly in MS J++. Like using MS API's in their Dev?

Just Wondering.




KeyserSoze

that's my understanding... they complained that ms was violating the TOS or something. naturally, ms obeyed the law, and ceased violating it :D

ahaha i love how MS screwed Sun over on that one...
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,086
3,851
136
Originally posted by: gopunk

that's my understanding... they complained that ms was violating the TOS or something. naturally, ms obeyed the law, and ceased violating it :D

ahaha i love how MS screwed Sun over on that one...
TOS are for AOL losers, not tech companies.

Your MS fanboy analysis is wrong anyhow. Sun prevented MS from pulling its infamous embrace/extend strategy on Java. Java may not crack the Windows desktop, but on a similar note, MS wasn't able to crack Java in enterprise software.

Sun made the right decision to protect their own interests.