Originally posted by: Staley8
b/c your body weight is spread out over 5 points of contact/wheels and not just 4. B/c of this, the wheels have less drag, so instead of the 4 wheels sinking into the ground and having a lot of the wheel touching the ground at the same time, the 5 wheels don't compress quit as much, therefore a little less of the wheel is touching and there is a little less drag on each wheel.........honestly it sounds good to me but I really have no idea![]()
Originally posted by: Staley8
b/c your body weight is spread out over 5 points of contact/wheels and not just 4. B/c of this, the wheels have less drag, so instead of the 4 wheels sinking into the ground and having a lot of the wheel touching the ground at the same time, the 5 wheels don't compress quit as much, therefore a little less of the wheel is touching and there is a little less drag on each wheel.........honestly it sounds good to me but I really have no idea![]()
Originally posted by: Staley8
b/c your body weight is spread out over 5 points of contact/wheels and not just 4. B/c of this, the wheels have less drag, so instead of the 4 wheels sinking into the ground and having a lot of the wheel touching the ground at the same time, the 5 wheels don't compress quit as much, therefore a little less of the wheel is touching and there is a little less drag on each wheel.........honestly it sounds good to me but I really have no idea![]()
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: Staley8
b/c your body weight is spread out over 5 points of contact/wheels and not just 4. B/c of this, the wheels have less drag, so instead of the 4 wheels sinking into the ground and having a lot of the wheel touching the ground at the same time, the 5 wheels don't compress quit as much, therefore a little less of the wheel is touching and there is a little less drag on each wheel.........honestly it sounds good to me but I really have no idea![]()
i'm by far not a physics major... but all things being equal, wouldn't the drag be exactly the same reguardless of how many points of contact? It would all average out, and if anything be detrimental in that there is actually more surface area in contact/points rubbing to slow down.
AFAIK the only advantage to a larger skate is it's weight distribution adds to the stability.
I'm probably wrong... like I said, I have no clue![]()
Originally posted by: Staley8
My only analgy is think of putting a 200lb object (say a large box) onto 1 round wheel/ball. Then push it, it would be hard because that one ball has to take all of the weight so it can't roll as well. Now put that same box onto a platform that has 25 wheels/balls under it. It would push very easy now......dang it has been too long since I took physics.
Originally posted by: NeoPTLD
Roadbikes have narrower tires than mountain bikes and electric cars have narrower tires than a Ferrari.
What that means is narrower tires have have more weight per square inch, yet they're chose in favor of wider tires to minimize drag.
I don't think you can increase the mileage of a Honda Insight by putting a 275mm width tires even though that will decrease the amount of load per square inch.
