Why do Arabs treat their Palestinian brethern so badly?

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
From the book "Harsh Realities" by Atland:

For 19 years, until 1967, Jordan brutally occupied the renamed ?West Bank? with its 20 UNWRA refugee camps.... And when western Palestinians rioted in December ?55, April ?57, April ?63, Nov. ?66 and April ?67, King Hussein sent in tanks which shelled city streets and machine gunned people at random, killing hundreds of men, women and children.

The Gaza Strip, as it was known for the 19 years of harsh Egyptian occupation, had 8 UNWRA refugee camps in which the Palestinians were forced to live in overcrowded squalor. Egypt refused to absorb any refugees; kept them stateless, denied passports, and forbade them to travel or work in Egypt. [On the other hand, Palestinians were permitted to work in Israel after 1967.]

For 19 years of brutal occupation of their fellow Arabs, Jordan and Egypt kept these areas in a deliberate state of economic stagnation and severe unemployment. Average unemployment in the early Sixties ran between 35-45%, and refugee unemployment hit a high of 83%. Yet during this entire period, the world was silent. Only after Israel?s seizure of these territories in a defensive war in 1967, did anyone discover the ?legitimate rights and national aspirations? of the Palestinian Arabs.

From a humanitarian viewpoint, their situation improved immeasurably under Israeli administration. Unemployment hovers around a mere 1% (1989) and per capita gross income tripled in less than 20 years; infant mortality rates dropped from the pre-1967 140 per 1,000 to only 30 per 1,000 today?at a time when the rest of the Arab world is still at 80 per 1,000; 7 Arab colleges and universities were established under Israel ?occupation,? where none existed before 1967. Yet it is Israel that is now being attacked.

Had the Arab countries any true intentions of helping their beleaguered brethren from western Palestine, they would and could have absorbed them easily 4 decades ago, as the Israelites did of an even greater number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands. The Palestinian Arabs share the same language, religion and culture, and for 70% of them, the same countries of origin just 3 generations before when their grandfathers emigrated for economic reasons to Palestine from surrounding Arab lands. But the 22 Arab countries, uninterested in aiding in Palestinian brothers, preferred to use them as a political weapon to wield against Israel, and the U.N. supported this heartless human manipulation.

In the mid-1970?s Israel attempted to give the Palestinian Arab refugees in Gaza new and better housing. The U.N. General Assembly, at the urging of the Arab states, passed Resolution 32/90 condemning Israel for trying to relocate these refugees and demanded they be returned ?to the camps in which they were removed.? And yet, a senior U.N. official came to Gaza in January 1988 accompanied by 10 TV crews on a fact-finding visit and laid the entire blame for the situation at Israel?s feet. As if the U.N.?s own complicity in the matter didn?t exist!


 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
Interesting read...folds into the near 100% deal Clinton negotiated for Arafat in the closing days of his administration. But Arafat refused the deal because he would then be required to govern the criminals and lunatics who would rather sit around and make pipe bombs then participate in a true government. People forget Arafat has surrounded him self with people hell bent on violence and would kill him if he signed even a 100% agreement. They don't want to give up all the free booze,drugs and money and guns they collect as members of Arafat's entourage. Thus the need to get rid of Arafat and the scoundrels he packs around with him.
 

syzygy

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2001
3,038
0
76
who is this yedleya atland ?
other than a few excerpts from his book on fundamentalist christian sites, i couldn't locate his name nor the title of his
book using google. barnes and noble nor amazon had nothing too.

from the excerpts you sight, i'd like to know where he finds the following quotation (?to the camps in which they were removed?)
in u.n. resolution 32/90. ?
that resolution speaks nothing about u.n. condemnation of purported isreali attempts to relocate anyone, certinly not the palestinian
refugees. the resolution does mention continuing isreali failure to reptriate, compensate, and/or resettle the refugees.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
It's not just Palestinians. Saddam Hussein used poison gas to put down unrest among his own people. Egypt and Sudan regularly go at it, the Ethiopians and Eritreans have been at each other's throats for ages, and let's not forget the nice peoples of Yemen and Somalia happily killing each other as quickly as they can. The Arabs don't have a problem with killing each other, it's just that Israel tends to get the most attention because it's the focus of their hate.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
QUESTION:

Why are there still refugees from 1948, still living in refugee camps generations after the original displacement?

ANSWER:

"The Arab states do not want to solve the refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as an affront to the United Nations and as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders don't give a damn whether the refugees live or die."
- Ralph Galloway, former head of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine
Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), in Amman, Jordan, August 1958

"In general, one can say that Arab governments regarded the destruction of the State of Israel as a more pressing matter than the welfare of the Palestinian refugees. Palestinian bitterness and anger had to be kept alive. It was clear that this could best be done by ensuring that a great many Palestinians Arabs continued to live under sub-normal conditions, the victims of hunger and poverty. No Arab Government preached this as a defined policy; most Arab Governments tacitly put it into practice."
- Terrence Prittie and Bernard Dineen, in "The Double Exodus: A Study of Arab and Jewish Refugees in the Middle East"

The decision to sacrifice them [the Palestinian Arab refugees] to the cause of Israel's destruction was clearly enunciated in the aftermath of 1948-49 (keep them in camps so they can learn hate and seek revenge), and no action by Arab elites has shown evidence of a change of heart.
- David S. Landes & Richard A. Landes, The New Republic, September 8, 1997

The Palestinians are the only refugees who cannot and must not be absorbed elsewhere; their fate is to be played up as the mirror image of the Wandering Jew.
- Jacques Givet, "The Anti-Zionist Complex"



 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0


<< from the excerpts you sight, i'd like to know where he finds the following quotation (?to the camps in which they were removed?) >>



The General Assembly,
Recalling Security Council resolution 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967,
Recalling also its resolutions 2792 C (XXVI) of 6 December 1971, 2963 C (XXVII) of 13 December 1972, 3089 C (XXVIII) of 7 December 1973, 3331 D (XXIX) of 17 December 1974, 3419 C (XXX) of 8 December 1975 and 31/15 E of 23 November 1976,
Having considered the report of the Commissioner-General of the United nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, covering the period from 1 July 1976 to 30 June 1977,4/ and the reports of the Secretary-General of 6 and 21 October 1977,5/
1. Calls once more upon Israel:
(a) To take effective steps immediately for the return of the refugees concerned to the camps from which they were removed in the Gaza Strip and to provide adequate shelters for their accommodation;
(b) To desist from further removal of refugees and destruction of their shelters;

 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
glenn1

Don't forget the Sudan. Over 2 million people dead in the last 20 years and atrocities such as government helicopters machine gunning people who came out to get food relief.

You don't hear much about that. Of course it's a Muslim government in control.