Technically, yes, when the Apollo 11 crew returned they were placed in an isolation trailer that was onboard the aircraft carrier, just as a precaution. No microbial entities were found and subsequent flights did not have to sit in a trailer for 2 weeks.
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Why did US military destroy the UFO evidence?
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I doubt the 2 crews that saw and tracked those UFO's are "nuts", furthermore they were TOLD to go and check it out from the radar tracking aboard the Nimitz. Trying to increase the budget to keep up with aliens would be kinda laughed at in congress, any civilization able to solve the considerable challenge of interstellar flight is so far advanced from us a better missile or fighter would mean zero.
Well according to Wikipedia The Final Countdown is a Z Movie, which are much lower then B-Movies.
Z movie - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'm not sure about that as Aliens who solved the challenge of interstellar flight may not not have any experience at all in waging wars.
OccamsToothbrush
Golden Member
Right, right, because navy people never see things that are not there. Nobody was shocked when mermaids turned out to be real. I find it astonishing that the military has tech that can see a missile fly through a window, but when their people claim to witness something weird and possibly supernatural the tech consistently fails to provide any corroborating evidence. Kind of like how police body cams happen to cut out when they're planting a gun, but the parking lot cam in the 7-11 down the street manages to catch it just fine.
And yeah, you totally have the military nailed. When faced with something that could grant them more power, more toys, more freedom and more prestige they're absolutely going to stand up and say "Nope, probably nothing we can do here, they're tougher than us, spend the money elsewhere, we don't want it."
What the fuck planet are you from if you think that's how things work? Congress would erupt into fistfights to determine who gets to spend the most anti-UFO money in their districts.
Last edited:
KeithP
Diamond Member
It suggests the sudden movement off the screen was caused by the F-18 banking and moving out of view of the object, then suggests it was a "drone" yet no branch of the military has responded to clarify the issue and it's more than one pilot,
The camera's are using infra-red on most of these plus an F-18 is moving at speed as well.
Well that is true.
JEDIYoda
Lifer
There will always be those who always look for convenient reasons to explain the unexplainable!
You just have to look at the crop circle phenom to understands that people are afraid to admit there is something that we do not understand watching us......
sdifox
No Lifer
The Final Countdown
DigDog
Lifer
Aliens.
or to make the post a little longer,
the guy says the Aegis cruiser is one of the most sophisticated ... something. Which it isn't. It's sophisticated for being a warship, but it's no' sophisticated when it comes to science stuff. Aliens do not magically appear on earth, they would have to come from not-here to here, travelling in the straight-line-there-to-here fashion, which would make them detectable to instruments of such accuracy that what the US-o-A military cannot even comprehend. NASA is far more keen on finding aliens that any alien-conspiracy activist is, and they got better gear to do the job.
As for the testimonies,
i watched a couple of Bob Lazar videos, and i got to tell you, i believe him. And, i also know now that he's full of shit. My human, instinctive judgement will never be a good substitute for the cold, hard facts of science.
When NASA announces we've been visited by aliens, i'll put my tinfoil hat on.
or to make the post a little longer,
the guy says the Aegis cruiser is one of the most sophisticated ... something. Which it isn't. It's sophisticated for being a warship, but it's no' sophisticated when it comes to science stuff. Aliens do not magically appear on earth, they would have to come from not-here to here, travelling in the straight-line-there-to-here fashion, which would make them detectable to instruments of such accuracy that what the US-o-A military cannot even comprehend. NASA is far more keen on finding aliens that any alien-conspiracy activist is, and they got better gear to do the job.
As for the testimonies,
i watched a couple of Bob Lazar videos, and i got to tell you, i believe him. And, i also know now that he's full of shit. My human, instinctive judgement will never be a good substitute for the cold, hard facts of science.
When NASA announces we've been visited by aliens, i'll put my tinfoil hat on.
Why would you believe a lying piece of shit or even worst, even want to? 🙄🙄🙄
Bob Lazar - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Crop Circles are fake. People made with boards and rope. In others words, they are Hoaxes.🙄🙄🙄
Crop circle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
DigDog
Lifer
I'm sorry, you have failed your Read roll.
You can try again after you level up.
Failed what Read Roll?
DigDog
Lifer
believe him =/= he's right.
watching someone and thinking "hm, i trust this guy" is instinctive, but not necessarily accurate.
the reason why this is relevant is because often in Ufology videos you will see people who "i am so and so and have demonstrable experience of the field at a professional level" and all that may be correct which leads the viewer to assume everything else that follows also is. You see a guy, he appears genuine, and you go with what he has to say. Just because someone is a airforce major who's seen a unexplainable light, doesn't mean i should take his interpretation of said light.
I'm happy he reported it, but im marking it down as "unusual light", not "alien".
watching someone and thinking "hm, i trust this guy" is instinctive, but not necessarily accurate.
the reason why this is relevant is because often in Ufology videos you will see people who "i am so and so and have demonstrable experience of the field at a professional level" and all that may be correct which leads the viewer to assume everything else that follows also is. You see a guy, he appears genuine, and you go with what he has to say. Just because someone is a airforce major who's seen a unexplainable light, doesn't mean i should take his interpretation of said light.
I'm happy he reported it, but im marking it down as "unusual light", not "alien".
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
