Why Democrats Should Vote for Bush

wiin

Senior member
Oct 28, 1999
937
0
76
She voted for George Bush for President

Why Democrats Should Vote for Bush
Tammy Bruce
Friday, Oct. 29, 2004
As a Democrat and a pro-choice feminist, it?s time for me to explain why I support the president, and why other thoughtful Democrats should join me in doing so.


I can?t tell you how many e-mails I?ve received from other Democrats either condemning me for not toeing the line, while others write who are genuinely curious, after all the hate-mongering and demonizing of Republicans and the president specifically, they hope I can ease their fears about what their inclination to vote for the president means about them.

The simple answer? It means you?re a confident liberal, a thoughtful person who realizes that game of party loyalty takes a back seat to the safety of your family and this nation.
It also means you take the slogans of ?choice? and ?radical individualism? seriously. Isn?t it ironic that there?s nothing more radically individual these days than a liberal who doesn?t conform?

For me, Authentic Feminism is rooted in making it possible for people to make the choices that best suit them.

If you have recognized the weakness of John Kerry, and know in your heart a vote for the president is the right thing to do, join me and do it! It can be done with a clear conscience as you embrace the radical individual inside you that attracted you to liberal causes in the first place.

Because some things simply transcend party lines, when in front of that Early Voting touch screen, I stood there as an American first, and voted for George W. Bush. This nation, our lives, and the lives our children require nothing less.

I explain to detractors and supporters alike that President Bush is the man who will keep this nation safest.

The president and I hold dramatically divergent views on a number of social issues of importance to me, and yet for the 3,000 people who died on September 11th, abortion rights and same-sex civil unions mean absolutely nothing to them now.

These issues, while important to me and ones on which I will continue to speak out about, are luxuries in the face of a world war where the enemy is a stateless savage who hunts children and cuts off people?s heads.

We have a responsibility to leave this nation as great as it is to the next generation.

We all know, and must reflect on, the fact that the joy we have in our lives today is due to the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of other Americans who died fighting for this country. Those soldiers did not die because they were promised 72 virgins in the afterlife, they fought not for themselves ? they died in the most noble of American causes ? so future generations ? us ? could live in freedom.

I do not take that action for granted, and I have learned that generosity of spirit and commitment to freedom is inherent in each of us, and a duty we cannot shirk.

Those of you with children have a more immediate concern, which is the literal safety of the light of your life.

That little face looks up at you as you tuck her in, and sleeps gently knowing that Mommy and Daddy are there.

That same face stares at you in the morning, with a heart full of hope, limited only by her imagination because you confront, for her, the harsh realities of every day. And these days it?s not just about making a living, it?s about the Beslan school massacre, it?s a new al-Qaida tape threatening Americans at home, it?s about war and mad savages who have specifically targeted children.

I voted for President Bush because having a Pacifist Internationalist in the White House will only embolden those who salivate at the sight of our blood.

Having a man in the White House who stands for nothing will only excite Islamic Fascists who revel in torture and the cutting off of heads. I do not want a man in the White House who is so cold, when asked by a New York Times reporter how September 11th changed him, answers ?It didn?t change me much at all.?

While I know a Bush presidency makes my work as a feminist more complicated and demanding, I will love and be grateful for every day I have the luxury of working on those issues. And frankly, it?s not necessarily a bad thing to have a president who encourages social activism on issues.

Liberals make the mistake of thinking a Democrat president is indeed Daddy, who can be trusted in all things. Apathy soon follows that false comfort.

Bill Clinton showed us the decline of the Democratic Party into a gang spouting slogans to make women, gays and blacks feel Daddy was in the house, to our grave regret. What did we get? A sexual compulsive who put Monica Lewinsky on her knees instead of cutting bin Laden off at his.

Yes, there were plenty of Democrats, feminists, gays and blacks in the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and on those fateful flights. I?m sure you would agree that in their last moments their literal lives were more important to them than party affiliation.

I want a president who will be strongest making sure tomorrow comes, that this nation not just survives, but emerges from this war like the others we have fought, in a world that has been transformed for the better. I want a president who understands this is war, not a ?nuisance.?

I know George Bush has made many in the world angry, and frankly, I am dismayed at the hard feelings. A recent poll of Europeans revealed their general belief that Bush has made the world a more dangerous place.

Upon hearing that, I remind myself of the time President Reagan increased arms production and installed more Pershing Missiles in Europe as we faced down the Soviet Union.

President Reagan grappled with European polls, anger and resentment, all of which evaporated when the Soviet regime collapsed.

Yes, they hated Reagan, but he plodded on, never swayed by those polls or made doubtful by others? hatred. His resolve freed Europe from the shadow of a bear which had no mercy and the blood of tens of millions on its paws.

As a man of faith with a love of this country, Reagan stayed the course, and did what he knew had to be done. He was a leader, and I?m proud to say, one that only America could deliver.

Today, President Bush faces the same polls, the same anger, and the same resentment as he, too, recognizes and engages a rabid enemy of civilization, Islamo-Fascists.

Europeans felt Reagan was leading them to Armageddon, as they now insist Bush is doing. We can?t know what it?s like for Europeans to see such a young nation doing so many things, but one thing Europe will find, again, is that while we may be wild, young and even cowboys on occasion, we have a pretty good track record of making the world a safer and better place.

With George W. Bush at the helm, this time will be no different.

I voted for President Bush because he has freed 50 million people, 25 million of which are women and girls. The feminist establishment, in a shameful exhibit of their hypocrisy, has ignored that fact.


As a feminist, I thank the president with my vote, in solidarity with the millions of Afghan and Iraqi women who now, courtesy of the president and our astounding military, finally have hope, liberty and freedom.

Like all of our presidents, George W. Bush is quintessentially an American. He?s a Cowboy. A Texan. He will never be mistaken for a Frenchman. He?s a Yalie. He?s a man of faith, a husband and father. He?s a man who has fought with and overcome addiction. He?s a man of strength and character.

And while he is also wrong on some issues, if I have to work harder on social issues, I want it to be against a man whom I can admire, who I know, despite our disagreements, honors me in his work to keep this nation free and great.

For those of you who are Democrats and liberals ? and I know through my years as a leader in left wing causes, including feminist and gay activism ? we all have gone through a sort of conditioning that makes dissent or difference a frightening prospect.


Republicans and conservatives have been decidedly demonized in your circle?perhaps by your own friends and family.

Let me tell you this - voting for the President does not change who you are or what you stand for. I stand for the classical liberal concepts of personal liberty and individualism, and have spent a great deal of my adult life working for those causes. I have found that ?Choice? and ?Individualism? are only slogans if you never act on them. Sometimes being yourself means straying from the expected, standing apart from your crowd.

November 2nd is a good a day to be a Democrat who?s an American first.


For more information please visit www.tammybruce.com

E-mail Tammy Bruce at heytammybruce@yahoo.com.

Receive news, actions and updates on important issues from Tammy Bruce. To subscribe, send an e-mail to: tammybruce-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.






 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
The Dub had me until he took advantage of the horror and sorrow of 9/11 to persuade us via faulty intel and deceit to support his ill advised and ill planned excellent adventure into Iraq.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
She was never a democrat. And I bet if you could pull her voting record it would clearly show she's a liar.
 

Mayax

Banned
Oct 24, 2004
229
0
0
Let's see...

Democrat score card so far on this one:

2 Lesbian jabs
1 Racist Uncle Tom jab
1 Liar jab

If this continues, we're going to need Kerry to come save us from his followers.
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Hahahahah... funny reactions :)

It's funny, because Bush is pulling more support from women than he did in 2000. "Security moms". Surveys show that a younger, single woman are more likely to vote Kerry. Older, married women are more likely to vote for Bush.

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Hahahahah... funny reactions :)

It's funny, because Bush is pulling more support from women than he did in 2000. "Security moms". Surveys show that a younger, single woman are more likely to vote Kerry. Older, married women are more likely to vote for Bush.

Well Kerry does have full support of all the Goth girls who dig that whole Lurch thing he's got going on. ;)
 

TBone77

Banned
Oct 21, 2004
251
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Hahahahah... funny reactions :)

It's funny, because Bush is pulling more support from women than he did in 2000. "Security moms". Surveys show that a younger, single woman are more likely to vote Kerry. Older, married women are more likely to vote for Bush.

Well Kerry does have full support of all the Goth girls who dig that whole Lurch thing he's got going on. ;)

LMAO
 

Ringthane

Junior Member
Aug 1, 2004
17
0
0
Like all of our presidents, George W. Bush is quintessentially an American. He?s a Cowboy. A Texan. He will never be mistaken for a Frenchman. He?s a Yalie. He?s a man of faith, a husband and father. He?s a man who has fought with and overcome addiction. He?s a man of strength and character.

He never had to work a real day in his life, until he was a Gov in Texas.

He's a cowboy? You're on crack.

He's a real Texan like you're a real democrat.

He'll never be mistaken for frenchman, nor will he be mistaken for an englishman, a german, or a russian. He is mistaken as a Texan.

A man of faith? He was drunk and stoned through almost 40 years of his life while raking in dough in meaningless positions (not bad!), then "found god". Personally, I'm always suspicious of born-agains - they seem to have lost touch with reality somewhere along the way.

Fought to overcome his addictions? He had kids - they have a tendancy to make you wake up. It is not a testament to his fortitude, just a testament that he was not a complete fvck up. As Chris Rock put it - "you're SUPPOSED to take care of your kids".

Hs is strong - sticking to his convictions despite reality and circumstances.

wiin - get a grip. This man has screwed up, and does not deserve a second chance. Kerry can do no worse. He may not have the set-jaw that makes you tremble with delight, but he does have the experience and can only do better. He will not bring sweeping change to the government as the righties would have you believe - the house and senate won't let him.

By the way, I'm a registered republican voting for John Kerry.

 

Gravity

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2003
5,685
0
0
Anyone that used to head the most liberal women's org cannot be dismissed as a neocon.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Ringthane
Like all of our presidents, George W. Bush is quintessentially an American. He?s a Cowboy. A Texan. He will never be mistaken for a Frenchman. He?s a Yalie. He?s a man of faith, a husband and father. He?s a man who has fought with and overcome addiction. He?s a man of strength and character.

He never had to work a real day in his life, until he was a Gov in Texas.

He's a cowboy? You're on crack.

He's a real Texan like you're a real democrat.

He'll never be mistaken for frenchman, nor will he be mistaken for an englishman, a german, or a russian. He is mistaken as a Texan.

A man of faith? He was drunk and stoned through almost 40 years of his life while raking in dough in meaningless positions (not bad!), then "found god". Personally, I'm always suspicious of born-agains - they seem to have lost touch with reality somewhere along the way.

Fought to overcome his addictions? He had kids - they have a tendancy to make you wake up. It is not a testament to his fortitude, just a testament that he was not a complete fvck up. As Chris Rock put it - "you're SUPPOSED to take care of your kids".

Hs is strong - sticking to his convictions despite reality and circumstances.

wiin - get a grip. This man has screwed up, and does not deserve a second chance. Kerry can do no worse. He may not have the set-jaw that makes you tremble with delight, but he does have the experience and can only do better. He will not bring sweeping change to the government as the righties would have you believe - the house and senate won't let him.

By the way, I'm a registered republican voting for John Kerry.

Well, we can't all measure up!

 

AntiEverything

Senior member
Aug 5, 2004
939
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: AntiEverything
Originally posted by: conjur
She writes for Newsmax for crying out loud!

http://www.newsmax.com/pundits/Bruce.shtml



Just another Coulter-whore-wannabe
So she's a liar, kind of like when you claim to be conservative?
Translation: I've just been punked and can't take it, so I become the strawman.
Exactly.

Don't blame the messenger. I'm not the one claiming to be something I'm not in order to try to sway opinions.

You say she's a Republican pretending to be a lesbian so she can convince liberals to vote for Bush.

You're a Democrat who calls himself a conservative in the hopes that you can dupe some people into voting for Kerry.

Looks like you're cut from the same cloth.