Originally posted by: sandorski
Let me help you: "Intents and" not "intensive"
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Ahhh, delicious irony.
You might want to take a look at that string of quotes one more time
Originally posted by: sandorski
Let me help you: "Intents and" not "intensive"
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Ahhh, delicious irony.
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: sandorski
Let me help you: "Intents and" not "intensive"
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Ahhh, delicious irony.
You might want to take a look at that string of quotes one more time![]()
Originally posted by: ayabe
I think the part I appreciate the most is the end where they're interviewing Alan Stanford.
Classic.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: ayabe
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Irrevelant? Is that like a mute point?
Thanks, corrected.
A useful troll, you might have turned the corner.
For all intensive purposes, I think that was a compliment.
Ahhh, delicious irony.
Originally posted by: quest55720
I think Jim Cramer just went insane right on my TV. Wow is all I can say one hell of a awesome rant against Obama and his anti-business agenda.
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: quest55720
I think Jim Cramer just went insane right on my TV. Wow is all I can say one hell of a awesome rant against Obama and his anti-business agenda.
lol, was it as insightful as this rant about how great Bear Stearns was at over $60 a share only five days before JP Morgan bought them out for $2 a share?
the funny thing is Cramer is a genius compared to morons like you.
Originally posted by: Lothar
Why would anyone watch CNBC when one can watch Bloomberg?
Makes absolutely no sense.
I prefer news giving objectively which is what Bloomberg gives me.
The talking bobble heads on CNBC mostly give their news subjectively with a lot of speculations.
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: Lothar
Why would anyone watch CNBC when one can watch Bloomberg?
Makes absolutely no sense.
I prefer news giving objectively which is what Bloomberg gives me.
The talking bobble heads on CNBC mostly give their news subjectively with a lot of speculations.
unfortunately some cable providers don't give that option.
Originally posted by: CLite
Yup, I really hate the shear hypocrisy displayed by that network. They basically are a propaganda machine for the financial sector, which in my opinion is a industry full of bullshitters and gamblers. Oh well, maybe I'm bitter because I knew too many engineering friends who instead of going into a productive field went to become 80 hour week excel sheet bitches in that most useless of industries. hrm.. rants are fun.
Originally posted by: JS80
How weak one's mind is revealed when they tell you they think Jon Stewart is funny.
Originally posted by: tvarad
CNBC and other "business" TV channels should have had a statutory warning since their inception: "This is an entertainment channel. All that you see and hear on this channel is fictitious. Invest using the advice available on this channel at your own risk".
Originally posted by: JS80
How weak one's mind is revealed when they tell you they think Jon Stewart is funny.
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JS80
How great a stick up one's ass is revealed when they tell you they think Jon Stewart isn't funny.
qft
no way, jon stewart IS funny. He cuts through the bullsh*t quicker than anybody else on TV. Granted, he puts a lot of it on himself and spins it, but he calls out double standards and hypocrisy quite efficiently.Originally posted by: Bitek
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JS80
How great a stick up one's ass is revealed when they tell you they think Jon Stewart isn't funny.
qft
Double true
Originally posted by: Zebo
Think of CNBC as a casino host and brokers/CEO's/Investment banks as casino.
Originally posted by: JS80
How weak one's mind is revealed when they tell you they think Jon Stewart is funny.
Maybe you should create a financial predictions thread since you're the resident markets expert.Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: CPA
I'm not going to defend Kramer because he's a blowhard, but Santelli has been against all bailouts and handouts.
The point wasn't if they were for or against bailouts, it's that they have no idea what they are talking about.