• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why cant there be babe threads?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: Ness
Because then half of all threads would be stupid babe threads where someone posts the same picture that everyone has seen, then half the people say "SO HOT!" and the other half says 'NO, xxxxxx is hotter!"

Then we have a post on xxxxxxx, and the same thing happens there.

It's ridiculous. It's annoying, and it eat up bandwidth for nothing. We all know how to use the internet to get pictures of hot girls, we don't need new threads posted here every second.

have you seen the quality of threads here in ATOT? this whole forum is a waste of bandwidth.

Sure thing.
:roll:
 
What I don't understand is while rh71 can still have links to Jessica Alba and Elisha Cuthbert pics in his sig (not complaining, don't get me wrong 😀) but there can't be babe threads. ATOT would be a much happier place if babe threads were allowed again.
 
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
What I don't understand is while rh71 can still have links to Jessica Alba and Elisha Cuthbert pics in his sig (not complaining, don't get me wrong 😀) but there can't be babe threads. ATOT would be a much happier place if babe threads were allowed again.

Get this man a beer!



.......-=`:beer:
 
a cross section of ATOT topics:

would you spend a thousand bucks on a watch?
what's your claim to fame on AT?
orajel is my best friend right now
american idol ***5/12/04***
ways to stay up late?
do you use real passwords ?
custom tank for turtle?
how would you feel if you son or daughter wanted to be the opposite sex?
at what rpm do you shift?

and you say babe threads are worse or more wasteful of bandwidth? that's just the front page, and doesn't include topics that are in the wrong forum (how long is far cry - software / what do you use your usb drive for - gen hardware or even peripherals)
 
Originally posted by: fisher
a cross section of ATOT topics:

would you spend a thousand bucks on a watch?
what's your claim to fame on AT?
orajel is my best friend right now
american idol ***5/12/04***
ways to stay up late?
do you use real passwords ?
custom tank for turtle?
how would you feel if you son or daughter wanted to be the opposite sex?
at what rpm do you shift?

and you say babe threads are worse or more wasteful of bandwidth? that's just the front page, and doesn't include topics that are in the wrong forum (how long is far cry - software / what do you use your usb drive for - gen hardware or even peripherals)
Uh....

So what's wrong with all those threads again?

???
 
Originally posted by: fisher
a cross section of ATOT topics:

would you spend a thousand bucks on a watch?
what's your claim to fame on AT?
orajel is my best friend right now
american idol ***5/12/04***
ways to stay up late?
do you use real passwords ?
custom tank for turtle?
how would you feel if you son or daughter wanted to be the opposite sex?
at what rpm do you shift?

and you say babe threads are worse or more wasteful of bandwidth? that's just the front page, and doesn't include topics that are in the wrong forum (how long is far cry - software / what do you use your usb drive for - gen hardware or even peripherals)

uum...I hate to say this guys....but he has a point.
 
nothing, but they aren't anymore wasteful of bandwidth than a single babe thread would be. that's all i'm saying. it's not like AT would have to host the pics.
 
Originally posted by: fisher
nothing, but they aren't anymore wasteful of bandwidth than a single babe thread would be. that's all i'm saying. it's not like AT would have to host the pics.

They answer real questions and are involving. The contents of every babe thread would be the same. "I'd hit it." "Unf." Whatever.

The topics on the front page are varied and interesting. Google porn if you want babe threads so bad.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: fisher
a cross section of ATOT topics:

would you spend a thousand bucks on a watch?
what's your claim to fame on AT?
orajel is my best friend right now
american idol ***5/12/04***
ways to stay up late?
do you use real passwords ?
custom tank for turtle?
how would you feel if you son or daughter wanted to be the opposite sex?
at what rpm do you shift?

and you say babe threads are worse or more wasteful of bandwidth? that's just the front page, and doesn't include topics that are in the wrong forum (how long is far cry - software / what do you use your usb drive for - gen hardware or even peripherals)
Uh....

So what's wrong with all those threads again?

???

I think what he ment was that the babe threads have the same bandwidth value as those threads.
 
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Every other forum has them except ATOT. Why NOT!?

Because AT is not every other forum. You want babe threads, go to one of those other sh!thole forums where a bunch of tools spew sh!t like "I'd hit it" or "I'd hit it with a bat" yet wonder why they never get laid.

Yeah, besides you want to see "babe" pics just google them...its not hard
 
you can go into threads about mexican pygmy goats and see eight posts that say 'pics?', should we ban all threads? okay i'm done with this thread. next?
 
Originally posted by: fisher
you can go into threads about mexican pygmy goats and see eight posts that say 'pics?', should we ban all threads? okay i'm done with this thread. next?

No, we should ban you, trouble maker.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: fisher
you can go into threads about mexican pygmy goats and see eight posts that say 'pics?', should we ban all threads? okay i'm done with this thread. next?

No, we should ban you, trouble maker.

luckily the only thing you can ban is ever having a sex life beyond porn.
 
I don't think the mods lock too many topics of babes that actually have a point to them. It's the "Hey, look at this babe pic I found!" threads that get locked. If you want to post a hot babe pic, find something worthwhile to discuss about the babe other than "Would you hit this?" or "Is she hot or what?"
 
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
What I don't understand is while rh71 can still have links to Jessica Alba and Elisha Cuthbert pics in his sig (not complaining, don't get me wrong 😀) but there can't be babe threads. ATOT would be a much happier place if babe threads were allowed again.

Get this man a beer!



.......-=`:beer:

Again, the things I said...
 
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Oh take the sticks out of your a$ses. Drool over pictures? I get more a$s than a toilet seat....HOWEVER, I do like to drool over pics of hot chics.
Screwing your dog is technically not considered getting ass.

gasp! choking on ritz crackers here :Q
 
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Oh take the sticks out of your a$ses. Drool over pictures? I get more a$s than a toilet seat....HOWEVER, I do like to drool over pics of hot chics.
Screwing your dog is technically not considered getting ass.

gasp! choking on ritz crackers here :Q

:camera: 's 😛
 
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Oh take the sticks out of your a$ses. Drool over pictures? I get more a$s than a toilet seat....HOWEVER, I do like to drool over pics of hot chics.
Screwing your dog is technically not considered getting ass.

gasp! choking on ritz crackers here :Q

:camera: 's 😛

You are a sick,sick man!😛
 
Back
Top