Why Britain Rules!

[GasX]

The Government wants teens to engage in oral sex!

 

[GoodToGo]

Awesome, where do I sign up?

 

[Electric Amish]

Interesting....

That'd never fly in the US.

amish

 

[radioouman]

ack... Nasty teeth on my pecker... I'm glad I live in the US.

 

[Zenmervolt]

Why Britain Rules!

That's easy, Britain rules because it's closer to Ireland (and therefore closer to redheaded Irish lasses) than America.

ZV

 

[Kadarin]

Heh.. There's no way in hell America's religious right-wing fundies would ever let that fly here. However, from a practical standpoint, I don't think it'll work. They should be promoting the use of condoms and other forms of birth control and STD prevention instead. Promoting abstinence is a noble idea, but it's unrealistic unless other methods are also explained.

 

[Maleficus]

thats freaking crazy!

 

[stev0]

:Q

 

[Queasy]

Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Queasy
Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

Sexual activity is normal, healthy human behavior, even in people as young as 15 or 16; the taboo against it is cultural, not biological. The government should, however, encourage those who are going to engage in sexual activity anyway to do so in a responsible manner.

 

[StageLeft]

Who hoo!

 

[dolph]

"School children under 16 are being encouraged to experiment with oral sex as part of a Government-backed drive..."

best quote EVAR.

 

[Androck99]

:Q <---- "Oh! Face...you know, oh...oh...ooooh"

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Queasy
Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

Sexual activity is normal, healthy human behavior, even in people as young as 15 or 16; the taboo against it is cultural, not biological. The government should, however, encourage those who are going to engage in sexual activity anyway to do so in a responsible manner.

The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Queasy
Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

Sexual activity is normal, healthy human behavior, even in people as young as 15 or 16; the taboo against it is cultural, not biological. The government should, however, encourage those who are going to engage in sexual activity anyway to do so in a responsible manner.

I'm sorry, but I'd smack my kid silly if he/she was engaging in sexual activity prior to the age of 16...whether it was in a responsible manner or not. There are a lot better 'normal, healthy, human' behaviors that they can be engaging in at that age. AND I wouldn't want the government telling my child otherwise!

 

[KGB1]

Originally posted by: CPA

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Queasy
Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

Sexual activity is normal, healthy human behavior, even in people as young as 15 or 16; the taboo against it is cultural, not biological. The government should, however, encourage those who are going to engage in sexual activity anyway to do so in a responsible manner.

The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

Better than China's policy... 1 kid and that's all.
My aunt lives in London, I went to visit her, its very crowded there. I see the govt is thinking ahead so they wont have a crisis on their hands when so many people will be living in a small metropoliton area.
Unfortunately most guys (besides UK) think with their penises... its a shame there is so many unwanted pregnancies. And (red herring folks ) thats why people debate on the whole abortion issue. If people would simply wait to get married or take a more responsible role when having intercourse in a realtionship.. None of this would happen (rare cases might pop up.. but not in serious manners as it is now)

Mod Please don't lock.. hope this turns out to be an intelligent conversation..

<---------- All this from a Virgin... pfft I suck... I mean... aww

 

[GasX]

Originally posted by: KGB
Mod Please don't lock.. hope this turns out to be an intelligent conversation..

Based on your comments, I doubt it will happen...

 

[KGB1]

Originally posted by: Mwilding

Originally posted by: KGB
Mod Please don't lock.. hope this turns out to be an intelligent conversation..

Based on your comments, I doubt it will happen...

Very true....

/looking for Thesaurus..

 

[GoingUp]

Originally posted by: radioouman
ack... Nasty teeth on my pecker... I'm glad I live in the US.

LMAO nice.... actually the girls are quite hot, just skanky as hell

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: CPA

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Queasy
Morally reprehensible IMHO (and no, I'm not part of the religious right).

Ignoring the fact that encouraging sexual activities out of children is just plain out wrong, this kind of activity is not the responsibility of government.

Sexual activity is normal, healthy human behavior, even in people as young as 15 or 16; the taboo against it is cultural, not biological. The government should, however, encourage those who are going to engage in sexual activity anyway to do so in a responsible manner.

The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

It is an obligation of the government, however, to do what it can to protect the health and welfare of its citizens. If the government does not promote sex education, and as a result both unwanted pregnancies and STDs become an out of control epidemic, then this will have a serious and negative impact on the social fabric and resources of the country, and the government is failing in its obligation to the people.

 

[pyonir]

Wow that is the first thing that i've found that i like about Britain.

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: CPA
The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

It is an obligation of the government, however, to do what it can to protect the health and welfare of its citizens. If the government does not promote sex education, and as a result both unwanted pregnancies and STDs become an out of control epidemic, then this will have a serious and negative impact on the social fabric and resources of the country, and the government is failing in its obligation to the people.

STDs can still be transferred via Oral Sex. If anyone believes that teenagers are going to get all excited about getting it on and then stop at Oral Sex, I'd like to show them some real estate in the Florida swamplands.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: CPA
The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

It is an obligation of the government, however, to do what it can to protect the health and welfare of its citizens. If the government does not promote sex education, and as a result both unwanted pregnancies and STDs become an out of control epidemic, then this will have a serious and negative impact on the social fabric and resources of the country, and the government is failing in its obligation to the people.

STDs can still be transferred via Oral Sex. If anyone believes that teenagers are going to get all excited about getting it on and then stop at Oral Sex, I'd like to show them some real estate in the Florida swamplands.

I agree, and that's why I said in a previous post in this thread that encouraging oral sex wouldn't work. I am all for encouraging responsible sexual activity in those who are going to be sexually active anyway.

 

[GasX]

I'd be happy to stop at oral sex



or any sex for that matter...

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: CPA
The government is not in the business to teach sexual activity in a "responsible" manner. That is the job of the parent. And, I don't want to hear "but not all parents would do it because <insert reason here>". That's too easy an argument to just let the government take care of all social ills.

It is an obligation of the government, however, to do what it can to protect the health and welfare of its citizens. If the government does not promote sex education, and as a result both unwanted pregnancies and STDs become an out of control epidemic, then this will have a serious and negative impact on the social fabric and resources of the country, and the government is failing in its obligation to the people.

STDs can still be transferred via Oral Sex. If anyone believes that teenagers are going to get all excited about getting it on and then stop at Oral Sex, I'd like to show them some real estate in the Florida swamplands.

I agree, and that's why I said in a previous post in this thread that encouraging oral sex wouldn't work. I am all for encouraging responsible sexual activity in those who are going to be sexually active anyway.

well, the most lethal of the baddies is unlikely to be passed on through oral, aids.