Why bother with this lawsuit?

TheGameIs21

Golden Member
Apr 23, 2001
1,329
0
0
Bowflex lawsuit
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Nautilus Inc. agreed to pay a $950,000 penalty to settle allegations that the company failed to give reports on serious injuries and safety defects with nearly 800,000 Bowflex fitness machines, the Consumer Product Safety Commission announced Tuesday.

Under federal law, manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers must immediately report information about potentially hazardous products to the CPSC.

"The recent penalties levied by CPSC send a strong message that failing to report potential hazards is illegal," CPSC Chairman Hal Stratton said in a statement.

"Companies need to understand that the quicker they report product safety problems to CPSC, the quicker we can take action together and protect consumers from injuries."

In the statement, the CPSC cited the Bowflex's backboard bench, seat pin and incline support bracket hazards.

Among other injuries, the CPSC alleges that Nautilus knew of 27 incidents when the backboard bench broke apart and collapsed. The Vancouver, Wash.-based company allegedly knew but did not report to CPSC that consumers suffered back, disc and neck injuries and falls resulting in chipped teeth.

"No one likes to pay penalties, but the truth is we have a better reporting process and a new standard for safety," Ron Arp, senior vice president of corporate communications at Nautilus, told CNN/Money.

Nautilus' (Research) Bowflex equipment, which uses special power rods to provide resistance, is marketed to users through TV, the Internet and direct mail.


This company made a HUGE profit per unit and they are only being forced to pay just over $1.00 per unit. This will not make this company think twice next time. If the CPSC wants to make a difference, they will have to make the company feel it when they levy a fine. This just adds up to a payoff.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: TheGameIs21
This company made a HUGE profit per unit and they are only being forced to pay just over $1.00 per unit. This will not make this company think twice next time. If the CPSC wants to make a difference, they will have to make the company feel it when they levy a fine. This just adds up to a payoff.

Of course, it's a Corporation. They are the Holy Grail.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
You would have to be pretty talented to hurt yourself on a Bowflex.
Nah just performing an exercise awkwardly or with poor form could result in an injury I would imagine.

 

Kibbo

Platinum Member
Jul 13, 2004
2,847
0
0
This was only a penalty for non-reporting, not for the original deaign flaw, or the injuries.

That's a million dollar fine for not doing paperwork.
 

TheGameIs21

Golden Member
Apr 23, 2001
1,329
0
0
Originally posted by: Kibbo
This was only a penalty for non-reporting, not for the original deaign flaw, or the injuries.

That's a million dollar fine for not doing paperwork.

It's a million dollar fine when they cleared well over 100 million in clear profit on the bowflex.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: TheGameIs21
Originally posted by: Kibbo
This was only a penalty for non-reporting, not for the original deaign flaw, or the injuries.

That's a million dollar fine for not doing paperwork.

It's a million dollar fine when they cleared well over 100 million in clear profit on the bowflex.

I am guessing the injured customers can sue them as well for their injuries.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,030
5,321
136
I hope so. I am not in favor of rampant litigation, but if a company is at fault, reparations need to be made.