Why are you replying to this thread??

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Because I'm secretely in love with you. And when I say you, I mean Rossman. :heart:
 

AccruedExpenditure

Diamond Member
May 12, 2001
6,960
7
81
Syringer: SPI?
Gnote: watch the message develop
Gnote: LOL
Syringer: ooh
Syringer: of course
Syringer: damn, didn't catch that
Gnote: you're hella slow
 

Taggart

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2001
4,384
0
0
In this letter, I plan to discuss Syringer's insufferable, flippant op-ed piece quite extensively. Note that the details aren't pleasant. In fact, they're shocking. But I think that people who don't know what Syringer is up to honestly need to be shocked. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that this theme is stated in one form or another in every one of Man's great religions. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit.

I must ask that Syringer's cult followers address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Syringer because they saw no other options for change. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. Syringer refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. Speaking of what I call hateful morons, I don't need to tell you that Syringer bases his perorations on the belief that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that he intends to create a new social class. Lousy ideologues, improvident hoodlums, and dodgy, truculent boeotians will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their cat's-paws. What Syringer is incapable of seeing is that voyeurism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge.

You may be wondering why abysmal exhibitionists latch onto Syringer's screeds. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I try never to argue with Syringer, because it's clear it's not susceptible to reason. Irreligionism is the leitmotif of Syringer's accusations. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Syringer finds a way to incite racial hatred. Sorry for babbling so much, but we ought to teach Syringer a lesson.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56