To grasp the implication is not to agree to the point. You fail to provide a reason why they should go to war and get it over with. Why, is it making you wet your pants. Do you not like the tension of anticipation, or the fear you'll be asleep? What feeling drives you to ask your crazy question? You equated war to justice which is absurd. You made absurd assumptions based on the worst aspects of man. You clarify nothing regarding any benefits of strength. Where's the cleverness or loftiness of points you can't defend?Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: LunarRay
I think Dari is asking the question "why are they doing this?" because like Machiavelli who said something like this; "injuries ought to be done all at one time, so that, being tasted less, they offend less; benefits ought to be given little by little, so that the flavour of them may last longer." I think I'm quoting him... the point being that; do it (war) and get it over with and slowly help them back (those left alive)... I think this is Dari's point.. but, how would I know... I know..
WE HAVE A WINNER. You're on point.
The obvious and profound defect in your reasoning is that societies can progress. Your Koreas are all about saving face as they try to grow out of their mess. They want to fly and carry their cabbage too. All that's necessary for progress is to negotiate with an eye to satisfying the unconscious needs of the other. There is no enemy and us. There is only the enemy and he is us. Androids do indeed dream of electric sheep. Photonic sheep, though, are always a surprise.