• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why are there "women's studies" classes and no "men's studies" classes?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
because men are simple, and women are complicated. it takes much longer to study a woman and understand her than it does to study a guy and understand him. all we need is food, tv, and pvssy. women need much more.
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
because men are simple, and women are complicated. it takes much longer to study a woman and understand her than it does to study a guy and understand him. all we need is food, tv, and pvssy. women need much more.

Actually replace 'tv' with 'pc gaming' and I'm covered 😉

-spike
 
because universities need to suit the needs of the entire student population, which includes tailoring its curriculum to feminists.

plus, until only a few decades ago, a lot of women's achievements were overlooked simply because they were performed by women. i guess the class is more of a "women's appreciation" class than anything else.

i am a woman, but i have a ton of friends who pursued such academics -- such course studies are not my cup of tea, but i sort of understand the mentality behind it. (feminism has a LOT to do with it.)
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
because men are simple, and women are complicated. it takes much longer to study a woman and understand her than it does to study a guy and understand him. all we need is food, tv, and pvssy. women need much more.


They're not more complicated, they just lack logic and consistency.

From As Good as it Gets:

Secretary: How do you write women so well?
Melvin: I think of a man, and then I take away reason and accountability.
 
Mens studies = 1 hour of studying the go off to drink beer and enjoy the summer
Womens studies = life long class and you still can't pass
 
This reminds me of that commercial they played near Christmas time.

You see a guy surprise his wife with a new car with a big bow on it, which he somehow had inside the living room next to the tree. It's a mystery how he got it inside the house. The wife says, "Wow, where did you find a bow that big?", accurately pointing out what females notice.

My dad and I laughed about it, because that does sound like the kind of thing a woman would do, which is focus on the bow while forgetting the monumental task of getting a 4000 lb vehicle in the living room of the house. My girlfriend kind of laughed along, and said, "Yeah, really- where WOULD you find a bow that big?", completely missing the point, lol. Then we both laughed at her, at which point my mom chimed in and says, "What? Do you know of a place that sells big bows or something?"
 
Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: randumb
Originally posted by: bradruth
Originally posted by: LordNoob
From the women's studies perspective, all literature, history, etc. classes are all already "men's studies".

And from the men's studies perspective, all "women's studies" are...well.....kinda gay.

says the gender oppressor 😀

you don't have to be a woman to be interested in feminist theory

Right...you could be a gay dude.





:laugh: 😉

I resent that. :|

I'm not the least bit interested in feminist theory. 😛

😀
 
If you want an easy A in a class, take a Women's Lit course. I took Women in World Literature (as part of my diversity requirement) and basically, every single book was about how men oppressed women, and when women finally had a chance to do something about it, they did nothing.
 
Because everything women accomplished throughout history fits snuggly into one 3 credit course, whereas everything men accomplished requires the rest of the four years of study. 😛
 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: LordNoob
From the women's studies perspective, all literature, history, etc. classes are all already "men's studies".
this is the correct answer

One might say that is the case because women did not make a whole lot of worthwhile contributions until the 20th century (and the 19th to a lesser extent). Not that women weren't capable of making those contributions, and you could certainly say that their lack of contributions is a result of their accepted place in society (as dictated by men) and I would agree with you. But it's not because there's some concerted effort to leave the contributions of women (and minorities) out of those classes, it's because they didn't make significant contributions...
 
Originally posted by: Spike
Because Women are more fun to study? 😉
Not these types of women. Have you seen the dykes teaching these courses and those attending them? See what happens when you suggest that women should lead a more traditional role, in front of the stove. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Ranger X
Originally posted by: Spike
Because Women are more fun to study? 😉
Not these types of women. Have you seen the dykes teaching these courses and those attending them? See what happens when you suggest that women should lead a more traditional role, in front of the stove. 😀

My Women in World Literature teacher was actually pretty attractive. In a 40 person class (about 35 of them women), there were at least 10 chicks that were at least easy on the eyes.
 
Back
Top