- May 23, 2002
- 16,928
- 8
- 81
I'm sure there's a reason but I guess I've just never seen the specs to know why.
Flash drives have gotten quite large in size lately meaning up to 16gig drives are becoming more common these days. 16 gigs is more than enough space to contain an install of XP with room to spare or Vista should fit as well.
So why has no one integrated a flash drive type chip into a PC to hold the OS and maybe some Apps and then just have a normal drive as the second drive for all your data or other less critical apps?
Wouldn't this make the PC run so much faster than running XP/Vista off a normal hard drive for most things? Or are current HDDs able to read/write/etc as fast as the flash type drives can?
And if you had a couple gig drive could you just install XP right on the drive and boot to it and just run your PC that way or would the USB2 speeds cause a hang-up?
Just brain storming but it would seem that this would be the logical next step in the evolution of PCs...
Flash drives have gotten quite large in size lately meaning up to 16gig drives are becoming more common these days. 16 gigs is more than enough space to contain an install of XP with room to spare or Vista should fit as well.
So why has no one integrated a flash drive type chip into a PC to hold the OS and maybe some Apps and then just have a normal drive as the second drive for all your data or other less critical apps?
Wouldn't this make the PC run so much faster than running XP/Vista off a normal hard drive for most things? Or are current HDDs able to read/write/etc as fast as the flash type drives can?
And if you had a couple gig drive could you just install XP right on the drive and boot to it and just run your PC that way or would the USB2 speeds cause a hang-up?
Just brain storming but it would seem that this would be the logical next step in the evolution of PCs...
