Matt1970
Lifer
- Mar 19, 2007
- 12,320
- 3
- 0
Well presumably people being paid to analyze that could come up with a better estimate than I did in 3 minutes with Windows Calculator. Regardless, you seemed to think that it was insane to think that we could cover eight times as many people while only tripling our expenditures. I've shown that it is most certainly not insane to think so.
I'm pretty sure that if there is an inefficient government bureaucracy that you see wasting money you would waste no time in calling for its elimination. Why on earth would we want to preserve the wasteful and inefficient private insurance bureaucracy just because it's private sector?
As for the 'astronomical tax raises' you also forget that everyone would make more money (as there would be no more health care paid for by businesses), every product you buy would be cheaper as overall costs would be lower, etc, etc. The important thing is to focus on expenditures as a percentage of GDP. That tells us if we're really paying more or less money as a society.
Well all you need to do is look at what we have done to something as simple as education. We spend more per capita than any other nation yet rank 21st in quality of education.
