Why are people so hell bent on saying they "know" some celebrity did some crime?

CoolTech

Platinum Member
Jul 10, 2000
2,345
3
0
You people werent there, so you dont know jack! You were not a juror in MJ or OJ case so stop acting like you are all knowing or something. Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail. All you know is what the media told you and yet you think you are some kind of expert on whether someone is guilty or innocent. A sad state our society has come to where you are proved guilty before trial and even if you are judicially innocent you are never really innocent because of all these people who wont accept the verdict. What has this world come to?
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case since you presume OJ is innocent?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
I knew Miss Universe about a year ago. She was hot but not uberhot. Too bad she never had a reason to attend classes in an evening gown I guess.

I did not read the OP.
 

CoolTech

Platinum Member
Jul 10, 2000
2,345
3
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?
 

icejunkie

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2004
2,326
0
0
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?

because you're hellbent on saying you "know" some celebrity is innocent.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Now that I look back on it, I didn't even read the entire thread title. Haha. :D
 

CoolTech

Platinum Member
Jul 10, 2000
2,345
3
0
you cant form a real opinion without having the evidence at trial, simple as that. All most people know is what the media tells them, they dont study the evidence.
 

icejunkie

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2004
2,326
0
0
Originally posted by: yllus
Now that I look back on it, I didn't even read the entire thread title. Haha. :D

Yea, you're just hellbent on saying you know a celebrity :p
 

icejunkie

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2004
2,326
0
0
Originally posted by: CoolTech
you cant form a real opinion without having the evidence at trial, simple as that. All most people know is what the media tells them, they dont study the evidence.

There are people on death row who are potentially innocent and some that have already been executed who could have been innocent... So, is the whole trial/jury process without fault? No!

So I guess you can't form much of anything with or without anything.
 

z0mb13

Lifer
May 19, 2002
18,106
1
76
I hope you dont think mj is actually innocent..

if you do, please send your kids to neverland for a sleepover. after all MJ really does love kids and would do anything to please them.

 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?
where do i start....

who do you think killed Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman?
you forget that the whole trial was televised, so in effect, we were on the jury if we wanted to be and watched it all.
from the evidence presented OJ was guilty as sin, (and so it was proven in the civil suit that followed.) the jurors unfortunately bought into fancy slogans and a great legal team for the defense.

you are an idiot for suggesting, "Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail."
OJ could have been purple and a janitor in your highschool, and he still would have been guilty, his color or fame had no bearing on me wanting him behind bars. what a ridiculous statement. :roll:


go ahead and tell me you think OJ Simpson was innocent.
idiot.

 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
4
61
Originally posted by: CoolTech
you cant form a real opinion without having the evidence at trial, simple as that. All most people know is what the media tells them, they dont study the evidence.

Evidence, schmevidence. Since when do we need to let a few facts get in the way? Just look at P&N for crying out loud.

 

CoolTech

Platinum Member
Jul 10, 2000
2,345
3
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?
where do i start....

who do you think killed Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman?
you forget that the whole trial was televised, so in effect, we were on the jury if we wanted to be and watched it all.
from the evidence presented OJ was guilty as sin, (and so it was proven in the civil suit that followed.) the jurors unfortunately bought into fancy slogans and a great legal team for the defense.

you are an idiot for suggesting, "Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail."
OJ could have been purple and a janitor in your highschool, and he still would have been guilty, his color or fame had no bearing on me wanting him behind bars. what a ridiculous statement. :roll:


go ahead and tell me you think OJ Simpson was innocent.
idiot.

I am not one to say guilty or innocent either way without being on the jury, and how old were you during the OJ trial? you watched daily as a juror would have had to? yah-right-guy. The OJ Simpson trial was very racially divisive, people were generally on the fence of their race, were you under a rock or something?
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
I was 31 at the time of the OJ trial and watched most of it....he was guilty as sin from analyzing the evidence if you have any kind of a brain (outside the constraints of a courtroom), but I said he would be found NOT GUILTY because the prosecution was inept and did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. And as others have said, if he was not guilty then why have they never looked for any other suspects? The question is easy to answer. The evidence against OJ was irrefutable but the prosecution did not present it properly and let a killer walk.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
in related news clinton gets caught getting another BJ from this time beyonce knolls in public





































everybody laughs
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?
where do i start....

who do you think killed Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman?
you forget that the whole trial was televised, so in effect, we were on the jury if we wanted to be and watched it all.
from the evidence presented OJ was guilty as sin, (and so it was proven in the civil suit that followed.) the jurors unfortunately bought into fancy slogans and a great legal team for the defense.

you are an idiot for suggesting, "Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail."
OJ could have been purple and a janitor in your highschool, and he still would have been guilty, his color or fame had no bearing on me wanting him behind bars. what a ridiculous statement. :roll:


go ahead and tell me you think OJ Simpson was innocent.
idiot.

I am not one to say guilty or innocent either way without being on the jury, and how old were you during the OJ trial? you watched daily as a juror would have had to? yah-right-guy. The OJ Simpson trial was very racially divisive, people were generally on the fence of their race, were you under a rock or something?
heh. you are the one living under a rock - defending one murderer named OJ Simpson.

stick your race card back in your pocket. this is about a cold blooded killer and a botch job prosecution that didn't get a guilty verdict when they should have.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: yllus
moshie, you're adorable when you get all worked up. :p
:lips:

this OJ sh!t still strikes a nerve with me, and people who say everyone wanted him guilty because he was black, or married interracially, or was famous are total jerks.

he killed his ex-wife and her boyfriend in a fit of jealous rage. OJ Simpson made a mockery of our judicial system and got away with murder. anyone who says different has blinders on.

 

sygyzy

Lifer
Oct 21, 2000
14,001
4
76
What is guilt? Is it whether a person committed the crime or is it that a juror of their peers felt the prosecution presented a good enough case to warrant a guilty verdict? We know that Arthur Andersen was guilty but the verdict in that case just got overturned because the jurors were not given enough information to understand what they were deciding on. Or so says the defense.

Michael Jackson jurors were given a ninety-something page instruction book. I guess that was sufficient. I wonder who read it all.

I think anyone who thinks watching a televised trial makes them as informed as a juror is a lunatic. By the way, I watched the OJ trial. What did I see? A bunch of racist cops and bad investigating. Did everyone else miss that?
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: sygyzy
What is guilt? Is it whether a person committed the crime or is it that a juror of their peers felt the prosecution presented a good enough case to warrant a guilty verdict? We know that Arthur Andersen was guilty but the verdict in that case just got overturned because the jurors were not given enough information to understand what they were deciding on. Or so says the defense.

Michael Jackson jurors were given a ninety-something page instruction book. I guess that was sufficient. I wonder who read it all.

I think anyone who thinks watching a televised trial makes them as informed as a juror is a lunatic. By the way, I watched the OJ trial. What did I see? A bunch of racist cops and bad investigating. Did everyone else miss that?
why do you say the cops were racist?
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Originally posted by: moshquerade
wake up and smell the OJ you freakin idiot.

how come no one is looking for "the real killers" in that case?


and Im an idiot because?
where do i start....

who do you think killed Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman?
you forget that the whole trial was televised, so in effect, we were on the jury if we wanted to be and watched it all.
from the evidence presented OJ was guilty as sin, (and so it was proven in the civil suit that followed.) the jurors unfortunately bought into fancy slogans and a great legal team for the defense.

you are an idiot for suggesting, "Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail."
OJ could have been purple and a janitor in your highschool, and he still would have been guilty, his color or fame had no bearing on me wanting him behind bars. what a ridiculous statement. :roll:


go ahead and tell me you think OJ Simpson was innocent.
idiot.

 

Buck Armstrong

Platinum Member
Dec 17, 2004
2,015
1
0
Originally posted by: CoolTech
You people werent there, so you dont know jack! You were not a juror in MJ or OJ case so stop acting like you are all knowing or something. Most people are either bigots(hate the interracial relationship or the fact that OJ was black) or want to see a famous person go to jail. All you know is what the media told you and yet you think you are some kind of expert on whether someone is guilty or innocent. A sad state our society has come to where you are proved guilty before trial and even if you are judicially innocent you are never really innocent because of all these people who wont accept the verdict. What has this world come to?

OJ said publicly more than once that Nicole's fake tits were "his" because he paid for them, and no other man was going to enjoy them. The killer took the time to carve out her breast implants. Then you have the blood on his clothes, in his car, etc., and the fact that he was found guilty in the civil trial.

So wake up. If you want to cry racism and bigotry, point it at the African-Americans who refuse to see the truth just because he is black. OJ killed his wife and her boyfriend.