Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: amdhunter
I would have beat the living shit out of that monkey.
I don't know what that lady was thinking. If I were here, when the monkey went for my face, I would've sidestepped and grabbed its arm in my armpit, followed by a quick punch in the chimp's face with my left. I then would've wrapped my left arm over and around the chimps neck in such a way as to force it into a backbreaker. Then I would've swept its legs out from underneath him, released his right arm from under my right armpit, and power-elbowed the chimp in his gut, knocking the wind out of him. I would've then reached for the Kimber Ultra Compact Carry in my ankle holster, loaded with .45ACP Hornady TAP hollow points, while holding the chimps neck in my left arm. The chimp would've then received two blasts through the spine to incapacitate him, followed by a shot to the brain after he dropped to the floor. Believe me, that chimp would never have done to me what it did to that lady. I would've handled that thing like a champ.
Sure.
I can hear the woosh.
Heh yeah my bet would be on the chimp. Poor lady though... no face or hands... christ thats like that guy in the fly who had his face melted, but for real.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Just imagine if we fixed the MYH16 gene and L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase gene gene, we'd be superior animals. :Q
Yeah, genetically engineer it to become active during puberty or something, could be bad knock on side effects though, apparently the gene being defective could be the reason behind our intelligence, as it allowed more space for a larger brain but at the cost of weaker jaws.
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
I could be completely wrong on this, but I remember hearing something about how their muscles were attached to their bones, and where they were attached was part of it. Our muscles are attached closer to the ends of our bones, so we get less leverage but more movement for the amount of muscle contraction. They would have the opposite, more leverage from where their muscles attach to the bone. This is something I recall hearing, so it could be wrong.
I was reading an article on the web, it said that chimps bones are much more dense than ours, thus stronger as well. They are so much more dense that chimps would sink in water.
I read that as well whilest googling about for an answer, chimps cant throw as fast as us.
Ok so overall we've got:
1. They get more exercise
2. Denser bones
3. Denser muscles with more twitch muscles
4. Better arm leverage
I dunno i would still like to see one of our strongest people go up against a 100-150lb chimp just to see who wins. They have extremely strong arms, but what about our legs and their low stature? That would be a serious disadvantage to the chimp because it would be easy to kick.
I read somewhere a 90lb female chimp was in a ring at a circus and it was throwing people right out of the ring, apparently some of them were pretty well built people.