Yes you can edit what appears in the Note 4 notification shade, you just can't add shortcuts to the things I actually use/want!
Sure, you can't add stuff without Xposed and root so you are right on that one. And honestly I HATE the quick toggles on Galaxy stuff, I much prefer the stock Android style. But that is why I will never probably get another Samsung phone. Thanks to Android I have the choice to move to a new OEM without losing all my apps and my time invested in the platform.
I'm not so sure I agree with your assessment of Android and who it's aimed for. In my mind, iOS is aimed for the tech enthusiast; Android is for the masses.
I think where we differ is that you view Android as the homogeneous blob, mostly as represented by Samsung, because that is how iOS is. And I am not calling you out on that, MANY MANY people like to equate Samsung and Android.
And I don't disagree that iOS is aimed at a "tech enthusiasts." They are the early adopters, and the people willing to pay $300+ for a first gen smartwatch. I would disagree that the group called "tech enthusiasts" directly overlaps with "nerds" (aka the people on this forum) because a lot of tech enthusiasts are the "I studied computer science in college but I have never built my own desktops" type of techies. Or "I know photoshop and I do web design" kind of techie.
What I meant by my comment is that for people that are nerd nerds (the "my desktop is Linux Mint" kind of nerd, or "I overclocked my CPU
and my GPU" kind of nerd) the offerings that come directly from Google are some of the nerdiest phones on the planet. A stock Nexus device has a lot of rough edges and assumes that the person using the device actually knows what they are doing. Even then there are all kinds of things (like hold presses on toggle to do something, or multi-finger swiping, etc.) on a Nexus device that quite frankly a normal who is scared of clicking because he is going to break it won't get. On top of that Nexuses have minimal consumer support (compared to Apple with an Apple store, or Samsung with the Verizon/AT&T store) and now a new phone plan that takes understanding exactly what a gigabyte IS to even understand what your bill is. Google's offerings straight from Google are super nerdy. Heck their most accessible/popular device is a stick that is USELESS without another computer. That is so nerdy. They obviously dislike having to pander to normal consumers.
Samsung and its devices are on the other end of the spectrum. Their skin that they put on top of Android not only files off stock Android's sharp edges, it wraps bubble wrap around everything like you do to your furniture when your toddler starts to walk. They target their OS at the absolute lowest denominator of technical intelligence, and then they give you the Easy Mode to drop it even further into outright Jitterbug mode. They take whatever the current version of Android looks like and skins it to look like a previous one in order to not upset non-techies that hate change because it scares them. Samsung is Android for the masses, for the people who can't find that Windows 8 start button, and it sells that way. It is Android as designed by a focus group, compared to an iOS that is the vision of Mr. Ive.
But Android isn't Samsung or its Touchwiz. Nor is it the Nexus's, even though that is what is assumed by a AOSP experience. Android is all the experiences put together, and for each type of person there is a device for them: for the artsy/millennials? Here is your HTC with Zoe. For the iPhone-loving techy? Here is your Moto X. For the bargain hunter? Here is your LG phone after its been on the market for a few months because they never hold value. And for the masses here is your Samsung toy phone with the bubble wrap and some literal bubbles. Cool thing is that all of them are Android, so give my 15 minutes and I can make them feel 90% like my current nerdy Android phone feels today. That is the power of choice.
On OSX I have all the apps I need/use lined up on the dock. That's what it's there for!
I use spotlight to launch everything. My dock is minimal.
I've never found myself sitting thinking 'how do I do that?' on my iPhone. The phone already does everything I need it to do, and what I didn't already know how to do is very easily accessible on the iPhone because Apple have designed the device so well.
I won't disagree with that. Apple holds itself to a higher standard than anyone else in the tech industry when it comes to their experience. They are also pretty brave about telling people what they want rather than letting the market make bad choices based on an imperfect economic system (the core count of iDevices is a perfect example of that). Their devices are often top notch when it comes to build quality, and their attention to detail is second to none.I am happy to give Apple plenty of credit.
What I don't like about Apple is the heavy hand that comes with that philosophy, and the concept if they make a decision for you don't try to get around it because Apple knows best. Actually I don't mind that as much as I hate the army of iFans that defend Apple's choices and act like I am a heathen because I want to copy a Blu Ray rip to my iPad for playback without iTunes or some app. I also don't like that Apple KNOWS that their phones have a perceived value margin and they take advantage of that to maximize a profit that is already larger than most countries' incomes. They represent so much of the phone industry, I think they need to give more value just like they have traditionally done with their Intel products (new Macbook excluded).
The gulf right now between the iPhones and the iPad is a perfect example of that. iPad and tablet value is dropping, so for $500 I can buy an iPad Air 2 with a 2GB of ram, three cores, and a GPU that beats the best Nvidia can do. But Apple knew that 2014 consumers would give ANYTHING to have an iPhone as large as a Samsung device, so they cranked out a low-value iPhone 6+ that costs $750 but has a lower resolution screen, half the ram, two thirds the core count, and a slower GPU compared to the iPad. No one can give me a good reason why Apple, a company almost worth a trillion bucks, couldn't afford 2GB of RAM in a $750 phone. They did it because they could, and because that is a way to FORCE those people who get it just because the screen was bigger to replace it when iOS 10 makes it run like a dog. Apple knows that eventually phones will get "good enough" for many people, and they would prefer that "good enough" device to be the second gen large screen iPhone.
No matter what I don't like about Samsung, at least they always cram as much hardware value as they can into their Galaxy S phones. I wish Apple could say the same thing. Honestly I wish it could be both instead of either/or, but that is how technology works a lot of the time.