I think their smaller size is a cost cutting measure due largely to the advantages of higher resolutions like 1080p not being fully appreciated until you hit 40" at least on televisions. Monitors are something else. I think 1080p is fine for my 23" I sit a couple feet away from, but there are posters on this board that think anything less then 2560x1600 looks TERRIBLE.
Really?
The only reason I care is having more desktop real estate, but then again I'm not a gamer.
Yeah. Mostly in the hot deals forum. There are some really passionate gamers there. I once questioned the need for such a thing outside of photo editing and was promptly told "Only an IDIOT thinks 1920x1080 looks passable at 22!" and such.![]()
anyone know of a good deal on one? Cheap is good.
I am shopping for a new 32" TV for my kitchen and they just don't have the resolution that a 26 or a 28" have.
I think their smaller size is a cost cutting measure due largely to the advantages of higher resolutions like 1080p not being fully appreciated until you hit 40" at least on televisions. Monitors are something else. I think 1080p is fine for my 23" I sit a couple feet away from, but there are posters on this board that think anything less then 2560x1600 looks TERRIBLE.
i'm staring at one right now that's 1080p.