• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Who's WORSE Hillary or George W.

I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That's like asking "what's worse, horse poop or dog poop?"

Well....I expect that Bush will be found to be the "worse one" there's alot of liberals on P&N (not saying that's a bad thing).....
 
Originally posted by: hysperion
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That's like asking "what's worse, horse poop or dog poop?"

Well....I expect that Bush will be found to be the "worse one" there's alot of liberals on P&N (not saying that's a bad thing).....
There's also a fair amount of conservatives and libertarians who despise the Propagandist.
 
Originally posted by: hysperion
While I don't really like either of them I can't stand Hillary.

Bush, by far. The worst Hillary ever did was propose Nationalized Health Insurance. Wait a sec, that was a GOOD idea that I'll bet many Americans wish had passed, these days...
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: hysperion
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
That's like asking "what's worse, horse poop or dog poop?"

Well....I expect that Bush will be found to be the "worse one" there's alot of liberals on P&N (not saying that's a bad thing).....
There's also a fair amount of conservatives and libertarians who despise the Propagandist.

I don't think it takes being anything to despise the Propagandist except having a working sense of right and wrong.
 
If you smell a bad fart, hillary might be close. If you smell the foulest kind of monkey diarrhea, you can figure gw might nearby as well.

 
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.

She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.
 
Dog poop is worse than horse poop. I have had many horse poop fights, but nobody dares to have a dog poop fight. The consquences of losing are too horrible to chance.

Oh, I answered W.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.

She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.

someones been listening to rush i see.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.
She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.
At least she would attempt to.
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.

She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.

someones been listening to rush i see.
No kiddin'!
So who should we use to fight the "WAR ON TERROR!!"?
I would vote Teddy, but he's been dead a while.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.

She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.

Bush isn't fighting a war on terror, he's igniting a furor, which is terrifying.

And at this point alqeda is living better in iraq than palestinians in gaza. Clinton couldn't possibly be a bigger failure, muchless gumby.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.
:thumbsup: True that bro.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
I don't think Hillary would take us to war over lies and have 1,770 of our men and women killed.

I don't think Hillary would put a fake version of Christianity in the forefront of domestic policy.

She's too busy waging war on videogames. She is a socialist feminazi whom I wouldn't trust to fight the war on terror.

Its obvious that Dubya and Rove, et al have successfully scared you to death of a terrorist boogieman. Go hide under your bed.
 
Never really liked Hillary Clinton or her sham of a marriage she's keeps. Bush I think is just straight up evil personified--wishs he had total power instead of 1/3 so he could impose a real draconian state but I'm not sure any politian does'nt wish the same but he actually acts on it. Plus he's not all that smart..slurs his speech..can't pronouce words and would be working as a used car salemen if he was born into the rabble.
 
Back
Top