• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Who's smarter: doctors or engineers?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
The correct answer is do you walk to school or carry your lunch?

Both require intelligence, but the skills AND temperment required are different. Millions of years ago I entertained the notion of going to medical school. Brain powerwise, I had no concerns, but I know myself, and I believe I would take the death of a patient too personally. That's bad for me. If I were to overcome it, I might become too detached to properly interact with my patient, which is bad for them. So it not all about high levels of smartness. I know this is somewhat tangential to the question, but it is a factor to consider nothwithstanding.
 

FeathersMcGraw

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2001
4,041
1
0
Originally posted by: MindStorm

Personally, I truly believe engineers are smarter because they have to take so many physics and math courses that requires and develops superior analytical thinking, deductive and inductive reasoning, and other types of mental abilities.

The notion that accurate medical diagnosis doesn't involve analytical thinking or deductive and inductive reasoning boggles my mind.

 

merlocka

Platinum Member
Nov 24, 1999
2,832
0
0
enginerds = teh dumb

only reason the poll shows other wise is that Anandtech doesn't attract a bunch of pre-med students to post mindless drivel every day... hmmm, is that telling you all something?

 

911paramedic

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
9,448
1
76
I am pretty sure you know where I stand on this one, but they are both quite different.

Doctors have a great deal more education, and have to update it every year. If you think medicine is a "static" thing you are quite wrong, there are new medications, treatments, and such that come out all the time. I will admit that most of it is a case of memory, and then going from there. If any of you have seen how dynamic a severe trauma or medical case is you would agree that they are indeed very good. (and some are not so good...)

Engineers also have a great deal of training, and also have to keep up with new tech. They are a more "creative" group, depending on their chosen path, but are very smart as well.

Doctors deal with situations that change very quickly, engineers deal with things over an extended period of time and can run through many different answers to a problem. A doctor has to decide on the spot and has no second chances. (I am talking about ER docs and trauma surgeons)

Bottom line for me, they are quite different and cannot be compared.
 

Spac3d

Banned
Jul 3, 2001
6,651
1
0
Doctor's are smarter.

I think ATOT is the wrong place to be asking this, too many biases.

Spac3d
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Very different kind of intelligence of course. Doctors have memorize, correlate and apply vast amounts of information and apply that knowledge in the abscence of all the facts.

Engineering in my opinion, is much more problem solving & creativity ... coming up with new ideas & techniques where none existed before. Not many doctors are involved in that sort of thing.

That said, in practice, at least in the US, I think the average doctor is much more intelligent then the average engineer primarily due to the selection process. Any bonehead can get into an engineering school, many can pass it. Just geeting into medical school is very difficult, and it's hell once your there. And takes forever.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Um, it depends! The engineers who developed the nuclear bomb were no dim-wits, but then neither are the doctors now who do brain surgery and all other kinds of ridiculously nutty stuff.

One way you could get the answer is to compare average salaries across the board of all MDs and all engineers (if we're talking about MD doctors). The MDs would have the highest average I'm sure.
 

pillage2001

Lifer
Sep 18, 2000
14,038
1
81
Originally posted by: quirky
Originally posted by: BMdoobieW
Engineers are smarter because they finish school in only 4 years, then they get to get paid to have fun.

a senior engineer once told me that 85% of engineers hate their jobs.

And you better believe it.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
When you say doctors, are we talking surgeons too?

Cuz frankly, I think that being able to perform open heart surgery or doing organ transplants takes FAR more skill than what you guys are giving credit for.
 

WinkOsmosis

Banned
Sep 18, 2002
13,990
1
0
Neither. Engineers are just number crunchers for designers and doctors... well some of the Asian "pre-med" majors that I know are dumb as rocks.
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
A bachelored engineer is not necessarily real smart.

However I would say (in general) that a PHD in engineering is typically smarter than a doctor of medicine.
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
Well let's see...

If a doctor fvcks up, a patient might die. Then his doctor's union and the rest of the doctors would back him and lobby to make sure he couldn't be sued or held responsible. His fvckup wouldn't be very publicized and his business would not suffer very much. Half the time, the doctor cannot even fix the problem.

If an engineer fvcks up, a building might fall - and hundreds of people would die. Then the other engineers would all ridicule him and tear him down as bad for the reputation of all engineers. He would be a failure and never be allowed to do any engineering again.

Who would you trust? a doctor or an engineer?

oh, and if you're currently on or in any sort of engineering structure - an office building, for example - you are trusting an engineer.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,057
4,708
126
"Just geeting into medical school is very difficult, and it's hell once your there. And takes forever."

"One way you could get the answer is to compare average salaries across the board of all MDs and all engineers (if we're talking about MD doctors). The MDs would have the highest average I'm sure."

Both comments are quite related. Doctor's have a monopoly on medical school. They don't let many qualified people in (I know many people with 4.0 GPAs throughout high school and college yet they couldn't find a medical school to accept them). Thus this monopoly has created a shortage of doctors (I live in areas which have a huge demand for doctors but there isn't enough supply). What is the result of a huge demand and an artifically low supply? Right, the doctors earn more money. Thus I think neither of those points are useful to this discussion. If engineers could control all the engineering colleges then they would also limit supply and have significantly higher salaries too.

As to the discussion I think it is also biased. It takes a special type of person to have the drive and desire to go to graduate school/med school. Generally these people are more intelligent than the general population. So you are comparing engineers who might have just a 4 year degree (or less) to doctors who have the drive and desire to go through many more years of schooling. Wouldn't a better comparison be engineers with masters/doctorates to medical doctors? This would eliminate the bias toward people with the intelligence and desire to go on to more schooling.

I personally have a bad impression of medical doctors. In my hometown the peditrician diagnosed every single one of his patients with asthma (including me). I took harmful drugs for years until I just gave up on them since I saw no effect. Later I was told that the doctor didn't perform any of the right tests - so there was no way he could have made a correct diagnosis on me. Doctors tend to do this type of thing - based on obviously incorrect information. For example it is common knowledge that exposing a young child to multiple environments (clean and dirty) gives them a great immune system. The more contaminants your immune system sees as it grows, the stronger it becomes. So what did doctors say for decades (and many still do)? Yep keep your child away from animals. Well guess what happened, those children soon developed alergies to animals. But the children raised with animals, have their immune system strengthened and have a significantly smaller chance of having any form of allergy. Wow, common sence. Yet you see everyday doctors surprized by that information. So many of them just seem to be stuck in the dark ages. I bet the majority of doctors think that women should have the same medical treatments as men. Well guess what, many current studies are popping up showing the exact opposite (for example tylenol is far more effective in men than women). Well wasn't that obvious? We have completely different hormones running through our bodies, so why should men and women be affected in the same mannor. Everytime I have a virus infection, I'm prescribed antibiotics. Guess what, antibiotics don't affect viruses (Note: those people who are immunocompromised by a virus such as HIV, have a good chance of also being infected with bateria, so those people should get antibiotics but not healthy people like me). I could go on and on with simple examples of how doctors really often don't have a clue as to even the most common sense things. So many of them are stuck in the dark ages - and don't read the latest medical discoveries. None of this means that they are less intelligent, but I certainly don't find many of them to be any smarter than the engineers I know.
 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
I'd say engineers, because going through school the most intelligent people I encountered were engineers. All Pre-med and med students have to do is LOADS of memorization, whereas the subject matter itself is not very difficult. Engineers have much more difficult to understand concepts and more importantly have to learn them inside and out in order to correctly apply them.

And as was previously mentioned, there is FAR more innovation and creativity coming from engineers than doctors.

enginerds = teh dumb
Spoken like a true idiot. What are you, another destined-for-McD's major?
 

FeathersMcGraw

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2001
4,041
1
0
Originally posted by: brxndxn
If a doctor fvcks up, a patient might die. Then his doctor's union and the rest of the doctors would back him and lobby to make sure he couldn't be sued or held responsible. His fvckup wouldn't be very publicized and his business would not suffer very much. Half the time, the doctor cannot even fix the problem.

If an engineer fvcks up, a building might fall - and hundreds of people would die. Then the other engineers would all ridicule him and tear him down as bad for the reputation of all engineers. He would be a failure and never be allowed to do any engineering again.

Who would you trust? a doctor or an engineer?

If we go with the implied assumption that all forms of engineering involve the construction of people-containing structures, your evaluation of intelligence appears to be based upon the capacity of a professional to cause harm as a result of incompetence. I guess I've been underestimating the intelligence of automobile workers, air traffic controllers, cruise ship captains, and cafeteria cooks, among others.
 

ManSnake

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
4,749
1
0
How many of you have actually passed the EIT/FE exam to be able to call yourselves a professional engineer?
To practice as a medical doctor, you have to get a license from the state and that's no easy task!

 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: ManSnake
How many of you have actually passed the EIT/FE exam to be able to call yourselves a professional engineer?
To practice as a medical doctor, you have to get a license from the state and that's no easy task!

EIT doesn't get you a license. EIT = Engineer In Training You need that, and a few years practice to apply for the PE test.
For many disciplines, a proffesional engineers license is absolutely required to practice (Civil, some type of mechanical & electrical).

In others, it's almost nonexistant, and never required.
I've only ever met two PEs in my field (Aerospace Engineering). One of them did it on a whim. I don't think I've ever seen a job posting in my field that even mentioned PE.

 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
775
126
Originally posted by: merlocka
enginerds = teh dumb

only reason the poll shows other wise is that Anandtech doesn't attract a bunch of pre-med students to post mindless drivel every day... hmmm, is that telling you all something?
Yea, they don't know how to use computers.

 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,057
4,708
126
Originally posted by: ManSnakeTo practice as a medical doctor, you have to get a license from the state and that's no easy task!
All goes back to the monopoly doctors have. One person could be the most brilliant, most life saving doctor of all time in one state, yet still has to go back to medical school for a year, spend hundreds/thousands of hours of work, and pay a fortune to retest just to move to the neighboring state. In addition that time spend in class will keep one more potential medical student out of medical school for that year. Just because doctors make this a pain in the butt to keep their salaries high doesn't mean that their intelligence is any different.

Edit: some states let you move with less than what I describe above, but certainly not all.
 

ManSnake

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
4,749
1
0
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: ManSnake
How many of you have actually passed the EIT/FE exam to be able to call yourselves a professional engineer?
To practice as a medical doctor, you have to get a license from the state and that's no easy task!

EIT doesn't get you a license. EIT = Engineer In Training You need that, and a few years practice to apply for the PE test.
For many disciplines, a proffesional engineers license is absolutely required to practice (Civil, some type of mechanical & electrical).

In others, it's almost nonexistant, and never required.
I've only ever met two PEs in my field (Aerospace Engineering). One of them did it on a whim. I don't think I've ever seen a job posting in my field that even mentioned PE.

Try to apply for any government engineering jobs, they all require you to have a license.
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: ManSnake
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Originally posted by: ManSnake
How many of you have actually passed the EIT/FE exam to be able to call yourselves a professional engineer?
To practice as a medical doctor, you have to get a license from the state and that's no easy task!

EIT doesn't get you a license. EIT = Engineer In Training You need that, and a few years practice to apply for the PE test.
For many disciplines, a proffesional engineers license is absolutely required to practice (Civil, some type of mechanical & electrical).

In others, it's almost nonexistant, and never required.
I've only ever met two PEs in my field (Aerospace Engineering). One of them did it on a whim. I don't think I've ever seen a job posting in my field that even mentioned PE.

Try to apply for any government engineering jobs, they all require you to have a license.

Uhm, not.
I work with government civil service engineers every day. I've worked with NASA engineers as well. Never got a card from them that mentioned PE.

I've interviewed for civil service AE jobs, PE was never mentioned. I just took a look at some listings on NASA and Air Force job boards, again no mention of PE.
 

blahblah99

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 2000
2,689
0
0
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: merlocka
enginerds = teh dumb

only reason the poll shows other wise is that Anandtech doesn't attract a bunch of pre-med students to post mindless drivel every day... hmmm, is that telling you all something?
Yea, they don't know how to use computers.

OWNED
 
Status
Not open for further replies.