WHOA!!! Total Shock... must see thread.

[TommyVercetti]

Straight from the Drudge Report, you heard it first on ATOT!

http://www.drudgereport.com/

SOURCES: NY DAILY NEWS PAGE ONE TUESDAY: 'HUSTLER' TOPLESS SNAPS OF JESSICA LYNCH; PAPER SET TO EXPLORE PENDING PUBLICATION OF YOUNG LYNCH PHOTOS...

AMBUSHED AGAIN!

--Skin mag says it has topless photos of Jessica before she went to Iraq

--War hero's spokesman rips plan to publish pix as 'unspeakable.'

From the story:

Lynch's new torment erupted the day before Veterans Day -- and on the same night she made a dramatic appearance at an awards event here in New York with fellow rescued POW Shoshana Johnson. (and Britney Spears, by the way)

 

[Kalvin00]

.

 

[Kadarin]

If she wants to take topless photos for Hustler (or anyone else), then by God it's her right to do so. There's nothing wrong with it.

 

[The Stigenator]

she is 18 so she can do anything...

though those pics might have been taken when she was before 18.. then age of consent inher state laws will prevail.

 

[JBT]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If she wants to take topless photos for Hustler (or anyone else), then by God it's her right to do so. There's nothing wrong with it.

agreed

 

[HappyPuppy]

I wish people would lay off Lynch. She hasn't done anything wrong or claimed to have done anything heroic. It was the Administration, the Pentagon and the news media.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Are you sure that she did this willingly? If her spokesman says this is 'unspeakable' then maybe they somehow got pictures of her from another source.

 

[Cyberian]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If she wants to take topless photos for Hustler (or anyone else), then by God it's her right to do so. There's nothing wrong with it.

I don't think she is having the pictures taken now.

Skin mag says it has topless photos of Jessica before she went to Iraq

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Cyberian

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If she wants to take topless photos for Hustler (or anyone else), then by God it's her right to do so. There's nothing wrong with it.

I don't think she is having the pictures taken now.

Skin mag says it has topless photos of Jessica before she went to Iraq

Doesn't matter. As long as she took those pictures willingly, who cares? It's not my job, your job, nor TommyVercetti's job to play the moral Taliban. If those pictures were taken by a boyfriend or otherwise meant to be private, then it's wrong to publish them against her will, but that's a wholly separate issue that has nothing to do with her character. If they were taken when she was a legal minor, well, then that's another issue as well and they certainly shouldn't be published.

 

[Cyberian]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Cyberian

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If she wants to take topless photos for Hustler (or anyone else), then by God it's her right to do so. There's nothing wrong with it.

I don't think she is having the pictures taken now.

Skin mag says it has topless photos of Jessica before she went to Iraq

Doesn't matter. As long as she took those pictures willingly, who cares? It's not my job, your job, nor TommyVercetti's job to play the moral Taliban. If those pictures were taken by a boyfriend or otherwise meant to be private, then it's wrong to publish them against her will, but that's a wholly separate issue that has nothing to do with her character. If they were taken when she was a legal minor, well, then that's another issue as well and they certainly shouldn't be published.

I agree, but it doesn't sound to me like she wants them published.

War hero's spokesman rips plan to publish pix as 'unspeakable.'

 

[neilm]

I'm not totally shocked 🙁