• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Who would in in a fight between a Tiger and Polar Bear?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
a few thoughts - Polar Bears are much, much larger than the Brown bears that live anywhere near Tigers in the wild.

Grizzly Bears are actually the baddest bears alive - Kodiak and Polar bears not far behind.

The only chance a tiger would have is a surprise attack from behind and an extremely well placed bite in the bear's neck.
 
Polar Bear would own a tiger. Biggest Siberian can hit 300kg while Polar Bear starts at 300 and goes up to 600kg. I don't think there are too many 600kg ones left because of the melting icecap. They are literally starving...
 
Grizzly > Polar Bear > Tiger

http://www.lairweb.org.nz/tiger/conflict13.html
Grizzly bears - the ultimate carnivore:

Almost all queries received on this topic request answers to the lion versus tiger question. Oddly, few people simply ask which is considered the Ultimate Carnivore.

This honour is held by an animal the tiger does not often have encounter; it is the grizzly bear.

The grizzly bear is a poor predator, taking down a caribou only when the opportunity arises. This, however, shifted his evolution in favour of the job in hand, namely as a digger of hard barren ground for roots, tubers and den building. The grizzly bear subsequently evolved enormous bone and muscle density; roughly ten times our own for a given size. They have developed into huge and enormously powerful animals.

Big cat biology is very different. They have evolved powerful elastic muscles over a low weight, low density bone structure to suit their purpose of chasing down prey.
Grizzly bear pit fights:

The Californians of the late 19th century staged well-documented pit fights with grizzlies and spanish bulls. The grizzlies, using their paw as a club, shattered the unfortunate bull's skull or shoulder bones so easily that the betting became poor.

Eventually, and at considerable cost, African lions were brought in to raise the stakes. The most fierce of the adult males was sent in whilst the grizzly was already waiting in the pits. The lion was known for bravely charging straight in and looked good for the money, but the grizzly killed a male lion almost as easily as he'd killed the bull.

The Californians never understood why. We now know that it was enormously strong bone density meeting a low density skull. At a range of 4 feet the blow crashed in before the lion could apply the wind pipe lock, which is lion and tiger learnt behaviour for taking down prey animals.

The ferocity of this animal easily matches that of an unsettled African lion.
The polar bear:

There is obviously no way tigers and polar bears can conflict, however comments regarding the grizzly usually lead to inevitable questions about the power of the polar bear.

The polar bear is a larger, but less robust creature than other bears.

Compared to the grizzly, it has a thinner, longer and more delicate skull, along with narrower forequarters. This streamlining is an adaptation for an aquatic life style.

The grizzly has a shorter, thicker neck, heavily built skull and more powerful shoulder structure. Despite being a good foot shorter, the grizzly has a trump card.

Their claws, having evolved as digging tools, are also unmatched at opening body carcasses. Claws of 6" aren't uncommon (9" record) while the polar bear has small hook-like 2" claws.

Sometimes, when the ice melts, polar bears have been known to be driven off by grizzlies, when they move south into the grizzlies feeding area. A grizzly will defend his barren ground patches jealously as he races to pile on enough fat for the end of summer denning


http://en.allexperts.com/q/Wil.../wildlife-matchups.htm

Polar bear versus grizzly bear: http://www.lairweb.org.nz/tiger/conflict13.html considers that the grizzly bear may be the ultimate carnivore, being more ferocious than other brown bears. Polar bears are generally larger than grizzly bears and are said to take off a human head with one swipe. Polar bears fight other polar bears more often than Brown bears fight other brown bears. If the grizzly and polar bears were of the same size, the grizzly bear would probably be stronger, as it is more robustly built, with enormous bone and muscle density. It has powerful arm muscles and a massive hump of muscle on its back that empowers the upper body with massive strength. The grizzly has a shorter, thicker neck, heavily built skull and more powerful shoulder structure than the polar bear. Its huge 6-9 inch long claws can open a carcass; the claws of the polar bear are 2 inches long. Grizzly bears have been known to fight off polar bears from their feeding areas. The grizzly bear has more power to strike a blow. The polar bear overheats extremely quickly and would find it difficult to fight for a long time.

My prediction: the grizzly bear would usually win, but the polar bear would have the advantage in an Arctic environment, unless the fight took a lot of time - then the grizzly bear would have the advantage.
 
I agree that a Grizzly would take out a Tiger, but here I am talking about Polar bears.

I still think a Tiger would win given the type of animals it has to hunt for food at times or defend its territory against. Polar bears really only have to defend their territory against other polar bears, but Tigers need to be aware of bears, lions, rhinos etc...

I think Tigers are more versatile in the type of opponents they face and that has a huge advantage against the polar bear.
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: L00PY
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Definitely a Liger.

i don't think he is including the magical animals
I don't think non-magical animals are magical.

Yeah, it's a real animal... I thought people knew this...?

how does it being real exclude it from being magical? 😕

I'm going to go out on a limb and say "Because magic isn't real"....

😕
 
polar bear and luckily these 2 don't share the same areas, there are only around 2000 tigers left in the wild
 
Originally posted by: miri
polar bear and luckily these 2 don't share the same areas, there are only around 2000 tigers left in the wild

are you suggesting polar bears and tigers migrate? :Q
 
Originally posted by: sdifox
Polar Bear would own a tiger. Biggest Siberian can hit 300kg while Polar Bear starts at 300 and goes up to 600kg. I don't think there are too many 600kg ones left because of the melting icecap. They are literally starving...

Polar bears dont eat ice. They can swim hundreds of miles without issue.
 
Polar bears have crazy size advantage, plus seriously thick fur. They're also very likely to have a reach advantage.

Add all that up, and you've got one dead tiger, no matter where they're fighting.
 
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Is there any animal on earth that a polar bear can't beat simply with one swipe to the side of the head? (well, I guess technically it can't reach the head of a giraffe.)

Elephant - it would just look at the bear like - who you slapping? you slapping me? I fusking tusk you man. I tusk you good.
 
Saying a polar bear would win because it's bigger and stronger is like saying a saint bernard could whoop a pitbull...

The bear wouldn't even know what hit it.
 
Originally posted by: LePetomane
Saying a polar bear would win because it's bigger and stronger is like saying a saint bernard could whoop a pitbull...

The bear wouldn't even know what hit it.


How about saying the polar bear because its MUCH bigger and MUCH stronger?
More like saying a Saint Bernard could whoop a chihuahua ....
 
Originally posted by: LePetomane
Saying a polar bear would win because it's bigger and stronger is like saying a saint bernard could whoop a pitbull...

The bear wouldn't even know what hit it.
Wrong. Grizzly > Polar bear > Lion > Tiger


Lions beat tigers more often than not. (Male lions)

Bears beat them all.

The Grizzly is the ultimate land animal, as far as fighting goes.
 
Back
Top