• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

who would buy a Ford 500?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: JDub02
correct.

the difference is that the 500 is a FWD vehicle, IIRC, and the 300 is RWD based. RWD generally handles better, IMO.

not in the snow.

It doesn't make as much difference in a heavier car. My old Grand Marquis would slip a bit here and there, but it was manageable. My old Nissan, however, had problems.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: JDub02
correct.

the difference is that the 500 is a FWD vehicle, IIRC, and the 300 is RWD based. RWD generally handles better, IMO.

not in the snow.

It doesn't make as much difference in a heavier car. My old Grand Marquis would slip a bit here and there, but it was manageable. My old Nissan, however, had problems.

there are three factors.

1 weight of car
2 torque at the wheels
3 width of tires.

if you have like i had, a light car (mustang lx) with relatively wide tires for the car (225's) and a torquey engine (300 ft/lbs of torque) you get very very bad snow performance. 😉
 
Back
Top