who will get to 3.2GHz first for a non EE/FX processor?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
That probably won't happen for a while, and even if it does CPUs clocked that high will cost quite a pretty penny. You're probably better off overclocking anyway.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Meh, you should have no worries getting that with just about any C2D chip from the AT reviews...
 

secretanchitman

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
9,352
23
91
X6800...just up the multiplier by 1x and you're already at 3.2Ghz. simple as that.

you can also overclock most of the core 2 duo chips to around 3Ghz as well.
 

R3MF

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
656
0
0
lol, P4's don't count, they are so rubbish they completely bypass my 3.2GHz dream. :p

i don't want to O/C, cos i like squeezing as much power as poss into SFF cases, so i want to keep the heat and power consumption down.
 

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,264
3
81
Originally posted by: R3MF
lol, P4's don't count, they are so rubbish they completely bypass my 3.2GHz drea,. :p

i don't want to O/C, cos i like squeezing as much power as poss into SFF cases, so i want to keep the heat and power consumption down.

Overclocking a Conroe to 3.2 will be the same as buying a 3.2 Conroe chip...
 

R3MF

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
656
0
0
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
54
91
There is a E6900 model that Intel has not launched yet. That is supposed to be clocked at 3.33 Ghz.
 

dexvx

Diamond Member
Feb 2, 2000
3,899
0
0
Originally posted by: R3MF
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.

You mean Thoroughbred. You'd be lucky to crack 1500 with a T'bird.
 

TheRyuu

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2005
5,479
14
81
If the voltage is high enough, you should be able to reach 3.2ghz. Mine can probably do it if I pump 1.6v through it (which I'll never do).
 

R3MF

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
656
0
0
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: R3MF
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.

You mean Thoroughbred. You'd be lucky to crack 1500 with a T'bird.
you are quite right, i never clocked my 1.2GHz T-bird, it was indeed my XP2100 that i upped.
 

R3MF

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
656
0
0
i want informed speculation as to when we will get to 3.2GHz on non EE/FX processors.

i want to know this because i reckon 3.2GHz is a nice number, and i would quite like to get a dual-core processor at that speed.
 

coldpower27

Golden Member
Jul 18, 2004
1,676
0
76
Rubbish? lol, the 3.2C Northwood, was better then the Athlon XP's at the time. ;)

If your talking about a processor based on Core 2 or Athlon 64 technology, this may or may not come to pass, anytime soon, 2007 minimum, no way in 2006.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,314
690
126
Pentium D 940 seems what he wants. (or dreams of, whatever) Indeed, the reality already went past his dream w/ Pentium Extreme Edition 965 @3.7GHz like 6 months ago.
 

GregGreen

Golden Member
Dec 5, 2000
1,687
4
81
Originally posted by: coldpower27
Rubbish? lol, the 3.2C Northwood, was better then the Athlon XP's at the time. ;)

If your talking about a processor based on Core 2 or Athlon 64 technology, this may or may not come to pass, anytime soon, 2007 minimum, no way in 2006.

The 3.2C Northwood is still a nice chip. I know I wouldn't even think about getting a new processor to upgrade my 3.0C if it was possible to get a decent PCIe board for socket 478