• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

who will get to 3.2GHz first for a non EE/FX processor?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
That probably won't happen for a while, and even if it does CPUs clocked that high will cost quite a pretty penny. You're probably better off overclocking anyway.
 
X6800...just up the multiplier by 1x and you're already at 3.2Ghz. simple as that.

you can also overclock most of the core 2 duo chips to around 3Ghz as well.
 
lol, P4's don't count, they are so rubbish they completely bypass my 3.2GHz dream. 😛

i don't want to O/C, cos i like squeezing as much power as poss into SFF cases, so i want to keep the heat and power consumption down.
 
Originally posted by: R3MF
lol, P4's don't count, they are so rubbish they completely bypass my 3.2GHz drea,. 😛

i don't want to O/C, cos i like squeezing as much power as poss into SFF cases, so i want to keep the heat and power consumption down.

Overclocking a Conroe to 3.2 will be the same as buying a 3.2 Conroe chip...
 
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.
 
Originally posted by: R3MF
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.

You mean Thoroughbred. You'd be lucky to crack 1500 with a T'bird.
 
If the voltage is high enough, you should be able to reach 3.2ghz. Mine can probably do it if I pump 1.6v through it (which I'll never do).
 
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: R3MF
can we work on the principle that i don't want to O/C?

i ran my 1733/333 T'bird at 2000/200 just like everyone else at the time, but i choose not to do so nowadays.

You mean Thoroughbred. You'd be lucky to crack 1500 with a T'bird.
you are quite right, i never clocked my 1.2GHz T-bird, it was indeed my XP2100 that i upped.
 
i want informed speculation as to when we will get to 3.2GHz on non EE/FX processors.

i want to know this because i reckon 3.2GHz is a nice number, and i would quite like to get a dual-core processor at that speed.
 
Rubbish? lol, the 3.2C Northwood, was better then the Athlon XP's at the time. 😉

If your talking about a processor based on Core 2 or Athlon 64 technology, this may or may not come to pass, anytime soon, 2007 minimum, no way in 2006.
 
Pentium D 940 seems what he wants. (or dreams of, whatever) Indeed, the reality already went past his dream w/ Pentium Extreme Edition 965 @3.7GHz like 6 months ago.
 
Originally posted by: coldpower27
Rubbish? lol, the 3.2C Northwood, was better then the Athlon XP's at the time. 😉

If your talking about a processor based on Core 2 or Athlon 64 technology, this may or may not come to pass, anytime soon, 2007 minimum, no way in 2006.

The 3.2C Northwood is still a nice chip. I know I wouldn't even think about getting a new processor to upgrade my 3.0C if it was possible to get a decent PCIe board for socket 478
 
Back
Top