Who thinks Bush is #*&$(#^ stupid for bombing Iraq?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

3615buck

Banned
Sep 22, 2000
786
0
0
Bush IS an stupid son of a b...
Flame me if you want.
The only thing he has done since he was elected is bombing Iraq pretending the US planes were threatened... AH AH AH... So easy !
Just like when Clinton bombed Iraq during the Lewinski affair...
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
3615buck has first hand knowledge, he was in the briefing room at the White House when the Bush was briefed. 3615buck knows of everything going on in the Middle East,
is priviy to more information that what the rest of us are reading in the news.
 

monckywrench

Senior member
Aug 27, 2000
313
0
0
I have been deploying to the Gulf area since Desert Shield as an engine mech/crew chief with various F-16 squadrons, mostly SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defense) units. Coalition aircraft ARE under constant threat, and having a safe zone for active enemy anti-aircraft assets would be idiotic. The Iraqophiles on this thread seem to think that because Saddam hasn't bagged any Coalition jets since the war he hasn't tried.
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
there is almost no possible way that saddam can attack america, unless he comes here himself and straps dynamite to his chest. they dont have the power for ICBMs to be launched from Iraq to anwhere in the US.
 

Thorn

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,665
0
0


<< They didn't to hitler, why they should with you?Any european nation attaked by US would have total support from the others, and probably russia and every other ntiona that hates US, as I said. >>


Ok, it would take 2 hours instead of 1. :p

We just need to go in and take that worthless hunk of desert by force and give it to the Kuwaities or Turkey.
 
Jan 18, 2001
14,465
1
0
Iraq is a bad deal for the US. The only way we win, is if the Iraqi people (or at least some liberal faction of the socially elite) dispose of Saddam themselves. Otherwise, we either let Saddam off the hook when we decide to forget about it (unlikely event) OR turn the entire middle east against the US and western policies of NATO when we kill him. To win this war of wills, we have to wait out Saddam while not turning him into a martyr. He already gets way too much underdog votes. Bush isn't dumb for endorsing this military action...its his only realistic option.

 

Usul

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,016
0
0
<<
<< They didn't to hitler, why they should with you?Any european nation attaked by US would have total support from the others, and probably russia and every other ntiona that hates US, as I said. >>


Ok, it would take 2 hours instead of 1. :p

We just need to go in and take that worthless hunk of desert by force and give it to the Kuwaities or Turkey. >>

Hay, I was speaking about France.
Iraq will take...
How fast did you say Ambrams can run? Because there is a lot of desert around that dictator... :)

And my vote is for Kuwait