Who Said Slippery Slopes Don't Exist? Man Sues Fast Food Chains for Health Problems (He's too fat and unhealthy)

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,171
18,808
146
Ailing Man Sues Fast-Food Firms

NEW YORK ? Want a class-action lawsuit with that burger?


A New York City lawyer has filed suit against the four big fast-food corporations, saying their fatty foods are responsible for his client?s obesity and related health problems.

Samuel Hirsch filed his lawsuit Wednesday at a New York state court in the Bronx, alleging that McDonald?s, Burger King, Wendy?s and KFC Corporation are irresponsible and deceptive in the posting of their nutritional information, that they need to offer healthier options on their menus, and that they create a de facto addiction in their consumers, particularly the poor and children.

"You don't need nicotine or an illegal drug to create an addiction, you're creating a craving," Hirsch said. "I think we'll find that the fast-food industry has not been totally up front with the consumers."

The suit does not specify the amount of damages Hirsch and his client are seeking.

Industry officials lambasted the legal action.

"It's senseless, baseless and ridiculous," National Restaurant Association spokeswoman Katharine Kim said. "There are choices in restaurants and people can make these choices, and there's a little personal responsibility as well."

KFC spokeswoman Amy Sherwood said her company couldn't comment on the lawsuit because it hadn't yet been served, but dismissed the idea that the fried-chicken chain ought to be held responsible for anyone's health problems.

"Eating sensibly combined with exercise is the best solution for a healthy lifestyle," she said. "KFC offers a variety of menu offerings for those who want a more healthy choice."

Walter Olson, a Manhattan Institute fellow specializing in legal-system issues, called the suit a blatant attempt to cash in on the recent publicity over obesity and the tobacco settlements. He also said it disregarded the idea that people are responsible for their own actions.

"Most people are aware if eating double cheeseburgers, it's not the same as celery," he said. "We all have appetites, but people have no trouble walking down the street and buying a different kind of food. They?re not somehow forced to keep going back and keep supersizing. Overeating is a bad habit and is one of the pitfalls of human nature."

So far, there's only a single complainant named in the suit, but Hirsch said at least two other clients would be filing soon in what he aims to make into a class-action lawsuit. All were regular fast-food consumers who suffer from ailments ranging from obesity to diabetes.

The lead plaintiff, 56-year-old maintenance supervisor Caesar Barber, ate at fast-food restaurants four or five times a week and blames his fatty diet for his obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and cholesterol and the two heart attacks he has suffered.

"I trace it all back to the high fat, grease and salt, all back to McDonald?s, Wendy?s, Burger King ? there was no fast food I didn't eat, and I ate it more often than not because I was single, it was quick and I?m not a very good cook," Barber said in an interview with Foxnews.com.

"It was a necessity, and I think it was killing me, my doctor said it was killing me, and I don't want to die."

Frances Winn, a 57-year-old retired nurse, said her habit of eating at fast-food restaurants at least twice a week since 1975, caused her to go from a size 6 to a size 18, and inflicted her with hypertension, high cholesterol and a hyperthyroid problem.

Israel Bradley, 59, said his ritual of eating a pound of french fries a week gave him high blood pressure, diabetes, made him obese and forces him to walk with a cane. In 1993, he passed out and had to be rushed to the emergency room because of the medical problems caused by his diet.

"I got addicted to it," he said.

Winn and Bradley would both file New York state suits soon, Hirsch said.

The aim of the legal action is to force the fast-food industry to "offer a larger variety to the consumers, including non-meat vegetarian, less grams of fat, and a reduction of size" of their meals, along with federal legislation that would require warning labels on fast food similar to those on tobacco products, Hirsch said.

"Hopefully it will change the eating habits of the American public," he said.

In December, then Surgeon General David Satcher declared obesity America's soon-to-be number one killer, and urged for there to be a healthier range of food available to consumers.
 

Sluggo

Lifer
Jun 12, 2000
15,488
5
81
Like nobody knew this wasnt coming. Mcdonalds pockets are too deep not to be exploited.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
"It was a necessity, and I think it was killing me, my doctor said it was killing me, and I don't want to die."

This man is sad... and avoiding personal responsibility. Get a box of wheat thins and a bottle of water. It's not that difficult.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
The decline of Western society: When the sense of personal responsibility for your own actions goes completely out the window in favor of litigation against those who have the $, no matter how ridiculous the lawsuit.

Fast-food chains' responsibility stops beyond posting reasonably accurate nutritional info.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Somebody please beat this fuggin morons with a chicken leg and hopefully knock some sense into them.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
actually i posted a thread regarding this lawsuit asking if you would take money if it was offered to you.

for eg. i'm 230 lbs, about 40 lbs overweight. i eat lots of fast food. if he was to win and they offered me part of the settlement, would i take it??
Here's a link to my thread btw. :)
 

Vadatajs

Diamond Member
Aug 28, 2001
3,475
0
0
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.


 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,171
18,808
146
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.

Why?

The precident has already been set with the Tobacco lawsuits. This is simply the next whoopsie on the slippery slope that started.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: AmusedOne
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.

Why?

The precident has already been set with the Tobacco lawsuits. This is simply the next whoopsie on the slippery slope that started.

I'd argue the precedent was first set with the imposition of tavernkeeper liability back in the 1960's(?) (as usual, blame California for another bad trend), but the point's academic. Anyway, welcome to America, where it's not your fault for anything! :disgust:
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,171
18,808
146
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: AmusedOne
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.

Why?

The precident has already been set with the Tobacco lawsuits. This is simply the next whoopsie on the slippery slope that started.

I'd argue the precedent was first set with the imposition of tavernkeeper liability back in the 1960's(?) (as usual, blame California for another bad trend), but the point's academic. Anyway, welcome to America, where it's not your fault for anything! :disgust:

I may have to agree with you there.
 

Vadatajs

Diamond Member
Aug 28, 2001
3,475
0
0
Originally posted by: AmusedOne
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.

Why?

The precident has already been set with the Tobacco lawsuits. This is simply the next whoopsie on the slippery slope that started.

I don't agree with the tobacco lawsuits either, but at least in their case, the tobacco industry was hiding information (not anymore), and their product has pretty much been proven to cause cancer and be physically addicting.

Even though both illustrate gross irresponsibility on behalf of the plaintiff, they aren't even in the same league.


<--smokes cigarettes, knows their bad, doesn't blame anyone but his own stupid self.
 

Michael1897

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2002
1,019
0
0
i'm suing Anna K for hurting my wrist.
I bought her workout video and well you know.....


I think this guy is stupid and he and his lawyer need a big b!tch slap by the judge.

there should be a counter suit for defamation of character by the fast food chains
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
maybe we should sue his school teacher because she did not teach him how to read the nutrition information of the food he was eating which is posted in every fast food joint in America.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,566
126
Originally posted by: AmusedOne
Originally posted by: Vadatajs
I fear the legal precident that this case would set should that lardass actually get his way.

Why?

The precident has already been set with the Tobacco lawsuits. This is simply the next whoopsie on the slippery slope that started.

the difference is that cigarettes are actually addictive and that the tobacco industry was hiding info. fraud is fraud. french fries are not addictive and are bad for you but no one ever claimed otherwise, something the tobacco industry regularly did in the past.
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Fast-food chains' responsibility stops beyond posting reasonably accurate nutritional info.
Bing! We have a winner. If you can read, you will be perfectly aware of exactly what is in your daily Big Mac, Super-Size Fries and Diet Coke. A sh!tload of calories, fat and cholesterol....that's what!

This guy needs to go on the Richard Simmons diet and STFU. :|
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Remember that this is just some fat, irresponsible idiot who wasted his whole life eating Big Macs on his deathbed. No one would listen to his pathetic whining if it wasn't for some greedy lawyer seeking to win big $$$$ from a frivilous lawsuit. :|
 

joe678

Platinum Member
Jun 12, 2001
2,407
0
71
Originally posted by: Michael1897
i'm suing Anna K for hurting my wrist.
I bought her workout video and well you know.....


I think this guy is stupid and he and his lawyer need a big b!tch slap by the judge.

there should be a counter suit for defamation of character by the fast food chains

LOL

"I trace it all back to the high fat, grease and salt, all back to McDonald?s, Wendy?s, Burger King ? there was no fast food I didn't eat, and I ate it more often than not because I was single, it was quick and I?m not a very good cook," Barber said in an interview with Foxnews.com.

how the hell is this the fault of the fast food industry?!!
 

propellerhead

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2001
1,160
0
0
How about this...

Let's sue all those idiots that filed frivolous law suits. Their actions have caused businesses to purchase butt loads of insurance thus increasing the cost of their goods and services.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
This lawsuit is too funny to be taken seriously. I'd love to be the newscaster or whatever from foxnews.com trying to keep a straight face during that crap. 1 pound of fries per week is now an ADDICTION people, bahahahha. That guy must have a trow of fries. "Supersize my trow please".

I don't think this can be compared at all to cigarettes, either. I have never seen a fast food resturaunt market its food as healthy, I've never seen them hide statistics. Even if those statistics are innacurate, if you read them you would know the food is UNHEALTHY - the level of unhealthy really doesn't matter at that point when your eating it DAILY. If cigarette manufactors had been sued because cigarettes tasted good yet caused people too inadvertently lose weight, I would laugh just as hard also. Cigarettes taste like ass, but are physically addictive, that is the problem. A mental addiction to fast food, is a problem someone needs to change on their own, you cannot enforce/regulate mental addictions in any really affective manner. Most people that are lazy and weak minded, will go from 1 mental addiction to another.

This guy is suing because he is finally learning what fast food has caused, besides being an ugly overweight slob, he now has multiple heart and health related problems. He has no one to blaim but his own unwillingness to change his diet long ago. If he wasn't a good cook, he should have LEARNED.
 

dafatha00

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2000
3,871
0
76
Ridiculous. America has gotten WAY out of hand in the number of irresponsible lawsuits being filed. Incidentally, my parents are being sued for 2 million dollars because of a car accident he got into. The woman that he hit had no reported problems or injuries initially, but suddenly, has mysterious back problems. :|
 

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
It was just a matter of time before lawyers went after Big Food. Mr. Hirsch is an idiot. Only he is to blame for his obesity yet, obviously, some attornies decided to take the case. Do we now live in a country by lawyers for lawyers?

Fast food joints make nutritional information available (this is fair). They do offer healthier choices (but who really cares if they didn't?). De facto addiction? What about Mr. Hirsch and his kind's de facto addiction to suing anything and everything for money? McDonalds and Burger King don't prey on (poor) children unless you consider adding playgrounds to your businesses predatory.