I give up. From now on when some dumbass squid wants to start out on 600 supersport I'm just going to keep my mouth shut and let the dipshit make his own mistakes.
ZV
Why not just start on a Fireblade? Actually that might get a bit dull after a while... why not go for a 180 BHP, 190 MPH BMW S1000RR?
ummm, who pee'd in your wheaties? Giving your opinion is one thing but to pretty much explode at him is a little out of line don't you think?
This same crap happens in the video forum too.
btw, I have no beef with you so don't retaliate at me.
Fwiw, I have had my "street" license for 12 years. I started on a 600 and ride a Hayabusa now. Am I dead? No.
Starting out on a GS 500 or Ninja 250 isn't gonna make a good rider out of a dumb ass. If he is gonna ride like an ass hat on one of those bikes he will die equally as fast.
I give up. From now on when some dumbass squid wants to start out on 600 supersport I'm just going to keep my mouth shut and let the dipshit make his own mistakes.
ZV
<mega snip>
I would like to ask you a question. What is your experience with riding a Sooooper Sport bike that makes riding one as difficult ass you are implying? Sure, if you get one above 8k they get a little silly but if one doesn't possess the self control and maturity to not abuse the power so be it.
<mega snip>
He will wreck on that 600. Even *if* he is incredibly LUCKY (as all the statistics are against him) he WILL be a bad rider.
Take two completely equal riders/people - put one on a GS500, another on an F4i. Give them a year of equal riding, then give the GS guy a 600 for a week and he WILL blow away the person that started on one. I've seen it over.. and over... and over... and over... and over... and over again.
Dirt doesn't count for crap on the street other than knowing how to use the clutch and shift. Just about every riding dynamic is different.
I practically drool everytime I see one. How does it rank against other 600cc bikes? I'm looking at 2004-2009 are there years that are better or most prefer? 2007-2008 are best for price/performance bang for the buck?
Exactly why I bought a '09 zx6r. I didn't know it had 107.7 hp. 5 more than any other 600 and 10 more hp than the cbr.I don't own one, here is a review comparing the bikes though.
http://www.motorcycle.com/shoot-outs/2009-supersport-shootout-87967.html
I think you're right about the 2007-2008 being best bang for the buck.
I read a news story about a year or so ago that was posted on a motorcycle forum I post on occasionally. It went something like this: Guy with years of dirt riding experience buys a shiny new 600cc supersport, he had just gotten it that day and was showing off for his friends, guns it down the street and cannot stop it in time, plows into a truck and he's dead. Theory was that his dirt riding experience taught him not to use the front brake...just another statistic with a distraught family he left behind.
I'm sure if did the same thing on a GS 500 he would have known to use the front brake right?
An uskilled rider is an unskilled rider
I know a story like that about a guy that has years of dirt experience and bought a new shiny 600cc supersport.
He's ridden it for a season and hasn't dropped it, or gotten any tickets, or wrecked it.
Oh wait, it's not a story, it's me. Stupid is stupid. Same guy might have lost his hand in a blender or something...
Well, if he goes for the 2009, at least there's a chance it'll have ABS...
BS. The only place you've seen it over... and over... and over... is on forums like these where you have the guys that are preaching 600s aren't safe on one hand, and on the other hand bragging about how fast they take the curves on public roads...
The bike you start out on has very little to do with skill, if anything it's the opposite of what you are preaching.
That's the truth at least.
Why so many analogies instead of comparing bikes/bikes? All the jet comparisons and car comparisons don't mean squat. When you compare the actual bikes themselves you get the real picture.
Oilfieldtrash, what was your first bike?
If you're anywhere near Texas I'd love to see who is a better rider on the track.I'll buy it for pennies Are on the dollar 2 months later... People like OILFIELDTRASH's mentality are keeping my hobby cheap.
My last acquisition was an R6 that the previous owner lost an ear on.
My first bike was a Kawasaki kx80 dirt bike. My first street bike was a Harley sportster 883. Then I had a Yamaha roadstar warrior, then my little brother got me hooked on sportbikes. Then it was in this order Kawasaki zx9r, Kawasaki zx6r, Kawasaki zx14, and the current bike is a '09 zx6r.
You have no idea what you're talking about, you've created a false reality based on your 6 months of riding experience.
A good friend of mine is in a wheelchair for the rest of his life over the same decisions you've made. I knew someone personally who died on a 600 ~6 months after I had these same arguments with him. I've seen this happen at least 4-5 times within my large circle of riding friends. I've been to the funerals, I've been to the hospitals beds, I've seen the road rash scrubbed out. I'm heavily involved with lots of riders, and I absolutely do know what I'm talking about. Plus my personal experiences/opinions are merely an aside to the hard statistics that back up what I'm trying to tell you.
The bike you start on sets your habits in stone, and it's nearly impossible to break these bad habits.
You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, hopefully you don't add to the statistics and screw up insurance even more.
Again, like I said in my other post... I'm really done arguing with people -just- like you every single spring. It never sinks in, not the firsthand experiences, not the statistics, not the fact that your insurance is sky-high for a reason. Unfortunately it tends to take an ambulance ride to wake you up.