Who makes the better mobile phone? With Poll

[TheSiege]

My vote goes to motorola

 

[imported_Trippin315]

Nokia's are tanks and get better reception than any motorola than I have ever used. Yes tey are a bit bulky, but I will deal with that for the function of a cell phone as opposed to a camera, video camera or PDA.

 

[tbike06]

Originally posted by: Trippin315
Nokia's are tanks and get better reception than any motorola than I have ever used. Yes tey are a bit bulky, but I will deal with that for the function of a cell phone as opposed to a camera, video camera or PDA.

:thumbsup:

 

[destrekor]

my motorola v710 is a beast of a flip phone, has camera (crappy nonetheless, bad chip or something even though its 1.3mp), and other nice features... and has the best reception I've seen in a phone. can get a signal wherever there is one.

 

[Lonyo]

Motorola suck at phones.

 

[JDrake]

just because of the razr

 

[Bartino]

working in cellular right now, i would have to say nokia. moto's high end stuff is good, but everything else is CRAP! we always have to send the mid and low end moto stuff out for repair. nokia is just really reliable and there high end stuff is just as cool as moto's.

 

[maddogchen]

Sony Ericssons!!!

 

[thomsbrain]

motorola has flat out the worst interfaces and keypads of any electronic product i've ever used. my vote actually goes to samsung, and here's why: they make a cheap, simple-to-use, reliable, durable, battery-sipping phone that slides in and out of your pocket easily. they do everything they are supposed to do well. they are flip so i don't have to lock and unlock buttons all day, but unlike motorola, they aren't flimsy and don't make brittle plastic creaking noises every time you touch them, or have play in the mechanisms.

edit: as much as i liked my sony phones, they weren't any better at anything than samsung's, and they mostly make stick phones. they rule on built-in ring-tones and alarms, but that's not enough to justify the cost and the crappy screens.

 

[dartworth]

the moto v635 is probably moto's best phone...

 

[RagingBITCH]

Nokia got their ass kicked in selling phones by Moto for a reason.

 

[mrSHEiK124]

Originally posted by: dartworth
the moto v635 is probably moto's best phone...

I love my V635! Moto FTW, they're built like tanks.

 

[simms]

You don't know what you're talking about... motos suck - are you on the RAZRwagon?

SE > Nokia >>>>>>>>>>>>> Moto.

But even then, Nokia's are still good. Motos are just cheap mass manufactured POS's.

 

[Lonyo]

Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124

Originally posted by: dartworth
the moto v635 is probably moto's best phone...

I love my V635! Moto FTW, they're built like tanks.

Sony Ericsson T700 is built like a tank.

 

[Justin218]

I had a motorola v600 and it had to be RMAed 3 times. I was not rough with the phone at all. One time when I woke up the thing was just dead and wouldn't turn on. On the other hand I have had 3 nokias and never had a problem. Nokia FTW.

 

[JulesMaximus]

It doesn't matter. I've had both and they are all pretty much the same. It's all marketing and people telling you what they think you need.

 

[Svnla]

I have them both <Nokia candybar and Motorola flipphone>. I have to say the Nokia is better <reception, sound quality>. I had the Nokia for 5 years and only switched to Motorola because the old battery couldn't hold the charge anymore.

My next phone probably will be a Nokia again.

 

[drinkmorejava]

I'd don't have enough experience with SE phones to say they are better than nokias, but I can say all the people voting for motorola need to be rounded up and shot.

 

[Albis]

when comparing expensive motorola phones vs expensive nokia phones, i would rather have a motorola phone

but for cheap-o phones, nokia wins hands down

 

[her209]

Samsung.