Originally posted by: vi_edit
I never said In 'n Out was greasy junk. I said that it simply was overhyped by zealous loyalists.
As far pork being "low class", we'll have to agree to disagree. Many cuts of beef need some sort of seasoning or marinade to bring a little zest to them. About the only exception is the Ribeye(and the prime rib), and that's not even the meat that making the flavor, it's the marbled fat. Even a ribeye typically gets a dash of salt, pepper, and garlic on it before it hits the grill.
It's hard to compare cooking styles between pork and beef. With most (steak) cuts of beef it's not a big deal if it's not cooked all the way through. There's not really any physical health concerns if it's not cooked past the killing point of bacteria in the middle. You can still eat it. You can sear the outside and still leave the inside tender and juicy. You have a lot more flexibility with cooking styles that way. And even then, if you cook a steak all the way through till it's "well done" it's going to be like gnawing on a tire. It's the fact that you can get away with it not being fully cooked that provides the flavor and tenderness.
With pork(and chicken) you have to cook them all the way through for it to be safe. There's really only one good way to make them both fully cooked and tender - that's low and slow. High temps will dry them out and leave them chewy.
A properly cooked chicken breast or pork chop/loin can be cut with a fork. Just like a steak. It's not a "low class" meat. It's just different. And for the money and the flavor, I'd gladly take a pork loin over a beef filet. At least the pork has a flavor. Plain old beef flilets are just bland...and overhyped. Kind of like In 'n Out.