Who likes physics problems

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
Here's the problem i need to solve:

You drop a rock down a well 1.5 secs later u hear it splash. How deep is the well?

assume acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s and speed of sound in air is 330m/s
 

invidia

Platinum Member
Oct 8, 2006
2,151
1
0
(1/2)*9.8m/s*(1.5)^2 = 11.025m ?


I don't understand how the speed of sound comes into play. Or are you trying to confuse us?
 

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
Originally posted by: invidia
(1/2)*9.8m/s*(1.5)^2 = 11.025m ?


I don't understand how the speed of sound comes into play. Or are you trying to confuse us?

the rock travels down and the sound travels back up its not a trick
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Is the rock on a conveyor belt that constantly matches it's acceleration due to gravity?

What is the air pressure and the medium for the speed of sound?

Air we taking into account the air pressure as the rock travels down the well?
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: invidia
(1/2)*9.8m/s*(1.5)^2 = 11.025m ?


I don't understand how the speed of sound comes into play. Or are you trying to confuse us?

the time it takes for splash sound to travel up the well is relevant.
 

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
air resistance is ignored...
its as if u have a rock freefalling in a vacuum and then the sound traveling back up the well through a normal atmosphere with a velocity of 330m/s
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
t1 = time rock falls
t2 = time for sound to travel up the well
s = well depth

t1 + t2 = 1.5
s = .5(9.8) * t1^2
s = 330 * t2

3 equations, 3 unknowns

10.56m

btw if you're gonna be picky enough to include the speed of sound in the problem, you should state how far above the well your hand is when you drop the rock, and how tall you are ;)
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
The air resistance is likely to be more significant than the speed of sound.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Dritnul
air resistance is ignored...
its as if u have a rock freefalling in a vacuum and then the sound traveling back up the well through a normal atmosphere with a velocity of 330m/s

But it doesn't work like that.

no sound in a vacuum. Did you just magically make air appear? Are we taking into account gravity on this air, because it surely affects the speed of sound.
 

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Dritnul
air resistance is ignored...
its as if u have a rock free falling in a vacuum and then the sound traveling back up the well through a normal atmosphere with a velocity of 330m/s

But it doesn't work like that.

no sound in a vacuum. Did you just magically make air appear? Are we taking into account gravity on this air, because it surely affects the speed of sound.

its a simplified problem its not meant to be real world
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: Mark R
The air resistance is likely to be more significant than the speed of sound.

yes but this is very typical general physics problem. in order for the calculations to work out without much more complex math, you have to assume the free-falling object experiences no drag, but also that the sound travels at a known speed through a known medium.
 

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Mark R
The air resistance is likely to be more significant than the speed of sound.

yes but this is very typical general physics problem. in order for the calculations to work out without much more complex math, you have to assume the free-falling object experiences no drag, but also that the sound travels at a known speed through a known medium.

Thank you
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Dritnul
Originally posted by: spidey07
if I had to guess...24.3 meters.

that isnt possible the rock wont fall that far in less than 1.5 seconds

Good. You're learning. Now work it out.

I guestimated. 1s = 9.8 M traveled. 2s = 9.8*2 = v of 20. two seconds = 30 meters traveled. At that distance speed of sound will not be a significant factor.

Just work it out.
 

Dritnul

Senior member
Jan 9, 2006
781
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Dritnul
Originally posted by: spidey07
if I had to guess...24.3 meters.

that isnt possible the rock wont fall that far in less than 1.5 seconds

Good. You're learning. Now work it out.

I guestimated. 1s = 9.8 M traveled. 2s = 9.8*2 = v of 20. two seconds = 30 meters traveled. At that distance speed of sound will not be a significant factor.

Just work it out.

theres an equation that will work through trial/error it is 10.567m deep, but i was hoping for some1 who knew the equation
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Dritnul
theres an equation that will work through trial/error it is 10.567m deep, but i was hoping for some1 who knew the equation

You have two equations. Solve for time.
 

Mark R

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,513
16
81
Basiclly, derive 2 expressions for the depth of the well - one based on the down leg, one on the up leg.

Reduce the 2 equations into a quadratic.

Solve.

Subsitute the positive root into the expressions for the depth of the well.
 

invidia

Platinum Member
Oct 8, 2006
2,151
1
0
Originally posted by: Dritnul
Originally posted by: invidia
x/330 + xt = 1.5s
and
0.5(9.8)t^2 = x

Solve for x

yea that looks right


no it's not, I just realize that x*t = meters seconds which isn't the right dimensions and won't add with seconds. Sorry.

I have it now. It's not two equations and just one quadratic equation. Do the work, I don't want to give the answer :)