Who has the most highest paying job here?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Siva
I say a true indicator of success should be hourly rate divided by age.

Hmmm.... Not an hourly worker sooooo

Annual Salary = S
Hours worked per year = H
Age = A

(S/H) / A = .95 for me

33 yrs old


0.93 @30
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: SquisherBut, my wife makes more than me :D

Mine gets all that the kids to not grab/committ to first.l :(

Lucky if I have $10 in wallet at any one time.

 

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
Originally posted by: Siva
I say a true indicator of success should be hourly rate divided by age.

If you still judge by hourly than you aren't that sucessful ;)
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
i have 5 highest paying jobs, i think thats more than the rest of you
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,751
6,625
126
(S/H)/A = 1.0 (.998, so I rounded up).

I'm 23, and that doesn't include my bonuses. w/my bonuses, 1.1
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
21$ per hr for 40 hrs.
31.50$ per hr afterwards.

Usually work 45 hrs

22 years old, Boston MA
Coop
 

pclstyle

Platinum Member
Apr 14, 2004
2,364
0
0
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: Siva
I say a true indicator of success should be hourly rate divided by age.

If you still judge by hourly than you aren't that sucessful ;)

can divide your salary by approx 1900 hours to figure that out.
 

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: Siva
I say a true indicator of success should be hourly rate divided by age.

If you still judge by hourly than you aren't that sucessful ;)
Can't help it--I bill hourly.

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
It occurs to me that this is a completely useless stat unless you know how many hours are involved in the equasion. The average worker puts in 2000 - 2200 hours a year. I'm over 3000 so it kind of skews the final number.
True, but most people would hate working that many hours.
 

Ilmater

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2002
7,516
1
0
This is a stupid way to measure pay, but I'm at just over 1.

If you don't factor in cost of living, someone like me from the Midwest doesn't stand a chance.