Oh my good Lord! There is nothing as saddening and as pathetic as watching some emotionally disturbed human beings desperately seek help by using impudent, daunting and aggressive responses and attacks on the 'net.
Russ, hon', I wish I could really help you. You seriously do need help. The saddest part is this comes from an old man whom one would think would demonstrate civility to the young.
Russ, what a sad life. It continues to puzzle me how one could have possibly been deprived of affection for the whole at least 45 years of his life. Hungry for a massage again? :Q I think that should work.
Riprorin, are you by chance related to Ripon?

Well, that's besides the point. I just wanted to advise you to take a look at your statament here and then your statements here:
[Riprorin to Valhalla1:]
"At least he graduated from high school, what about you? Isn't it time to grow up and stop being a punk?
Why don't you save some bandwidth if you don't have anything intelligent to add to the discussion."
[Riprorin to Valhalla1:]
"Have a problem with a book description? What's wrong too many words?
Are you capable of an intelligent thought or just ad hominem attacks?"
[Now Riprorin to Czar:] "[Czar:] 'I have just never found that personal insults get people anywhere so I'm trying to figure out why you belive personal insult will get you anywhere.'
[Riprorin:] Jeez, get over it already. What are you twelve years old?
If you're going to post on an emotionally charged issue, why don't you do your homework and get your facts straight? It will save you some'insults'."[/i]
Are not those two paragraphs contradictory or at least clearly hypocritical? Have you any religious leaning? If so, have not you been taught that malicious or deliberate inconsisitency is a transgression? Why have you chosen to tresspass against your fellow human beings on the basis of their positions on a geopolitical matter? Are not you of some spiritual leaning? If you aren't, forgive me for assuming some sense of ethics or intellectual honesty in my fellow human being.
If I may ask: What exactly makes the author you have quoted the utmost and supreme qualified authority for the history of that region and its people? Is she (he?) some divinely annointed person? If so, have you any proof of it? Care to tell me more and clear me of my confusion/naivity?
It is sad to see a thread intended for true knowledge deteriorate into another crappy indoctrination and propaganda.
To the original poster: If you want true or fair knowledge of that region and its history, read books from several sources. You can hardly find objectigve reports 'cuz each is always biased.
As human being, we all have a tendency to suppress that which is unfavourable to us and champion that which favours us. It is human nature. You will get that from both sides. So if you really wish to reach a conclusion from a stimulating and progressive point of view, read both sides. You will unravel some information hidden by side A and another hidden by side B.
Etech, I don't think your link throws in any confusion. I think it is clear your link speaks of conversion/interracial relationships. It is quite different from what it appears the original poster intended: From an historical point of view, who are the Jews and Arabs?
I think to throw in more confusion would be to include the Ethiopian Jews. Rarely do we hear much about them. Last I heard about them was when it concerned discrimination whenever they donated blood(?) it was gotten rid of deliberately without their knowlegde.
Aren't there supposedly a bunch of lost tribes still whose trails are unknown or no trace was found?
Storm Rider, I think you should point that out to Russ, 'cuz, as it appears, he couldn't distinguish between the semantical meaning and syntactical implication of the statements from the link Czar posted. He apparently bought into the idea that the U.N. (who ironically was behind the formulation of the nation of Israel) was in a conspiracy or hatred of Jews not to ever give a relatively fair report on the history of that region without taking sides, such as x existed at that region and x was man and man of a different race or man of an unidentified race.