I've got a c2-633@1g and a c2-566@850 that have been running Klinux uninterupted now for 63 days (the last power outage here!). 
Geoff
Geoff
Who currently has the longest running cow?
- Thread starter GeoffS
- Start date
you beat me at least hands down...
<< Dec 10 21:23:10 UTC] RC5: Summary: 2912 packets (12069.00 stats units)
47.13:18:05.50 - [788,509 keys/s >>
TF
<< Dec 10 21:23:10 UTC] RC5: Summary: 2912 packets (12069.00 stats units)
47.13:18:05.50 - [788,509 keys/s >>
TF
right on the summary line... Two Face has been running 47 days 13 hours 18 minutes 05.50 seconds (47.13:18:05.50)
Geoff
Geoff
Well, if the term "cow" is referring exclusively to the RC5 project, then I don't have anything running; however, if "cow" can also apply to SETI producers, then I've got one (a dual p3-600) that's been up and going for over six months!
Sounds like you guys need to run patches on your machines.
Patches??? We don't need no stink'n Patches!
Patches??? We don't need no stink'n Patches!
Oh we're talking uptime now? I was certain we were talking cows...
<< # uptime
11:48pm up 102 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.24, 1.18 >>
of course I don't come close to NWM's 6 months or HI's year... but I'm quite satisfied considering that that comp couldn't stay up 12 hours in win9x
Oy, forgot the patch thingie... running debian Eponymous... apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade and I'm all patched up. No reboot needed for "real" OS's you know
TF
<< # uptime
11:48pm up 102 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.24, 1.18 >>
of course I don't come close to NWM's 6 months or HI's year... but I'm quite satisfied considering that that comp couldn't stay up 12 hours in win9x
Oy, forgot the patch thingie... running debian Eponymous... apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade and I'm all patched up. No reboot needed for "real" OS's you know
TF
<< Oh we're talking uptime now? I was certain we were talking cows...
<< # uptime
11:48pm up 102 days, 10:15, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.24, 1.18 >>
of course I don't come close to NWM's 6 months or HI's year... but I'm quite satisfied considering that that comp couldn't stay up 12 hours in win9x
Oy, forgot the patch thingie... running debian Eponymous... apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade and I'm all patched up. No reboot needed for "real" OS's you know
TF >>
My uptimes suck, so I wont post them. Recent installs thats why
Anyhow, To upgrade the OS you will need to reboot right now. There are some people working on ways to bring up a new kernel, but its not perfect yet. So even "real" OSes need to be rebooted for a complete upgrade (even without kernel, some running, necessary processes may be updated).
Well, *I* was talking about cows... RC5/OGR... I don't participate in the other projects... yet!
Geoff
Geoff
BGod
Golden Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 1,373
- 35
- 91
One of my Win2K boxes in the basement:
[Dec 11 01:26:52 UTC] Summary: 50972 RC5 packets (212037*2^28 keys)
142.04:02:24.00 - [4.63 Mkeys/s]
One of my Win98se boxes in the basement:
[Dec 11 01:29:56 UTC] Summary: 32646 RC5 packets (135238*2^28 keys)
141.18:34:31.98 - [2.96 Mkeys/s]
Who ever said that Windows 98 isn't a stable operating system is full of crap!!!
[Dec 11 01:26:52 UTC] Summary: 50972 RC5 packets (212037*2^28 keys)
142.04:02:24.00 - [4.63 Mkeys/s]
One of my Win98se boxes in the basement:
[Dec 11 01:29:56 UTC] Summary: 32646 RC5 packets (135238*2^28 keys)
141.18:34:31.98 - [2.96 Mkeys/s]
Who ever said that Windows 98 isn't a stable operating system is full of crap!!!
Actually n0cmonkey the only reasons I've ever had to reboot my linux box is a new kernel... oh there's ONE other thing I've discovered that requires a reboot, but I didn't have to do it... when using an ide cd-burner in linux it emulates scsi with a line in lilo.conf that you have to reboot to enable... but that line was already in mine before I knew I needed it (one of the few blessings of mandrake )
/me will point out this thread to HI so he can put the smackdown on us all with his cow
btw ßGød AWESOME 9x uptime!!
TF
)/me will point out this thread to HI so he can put the smackdown on us all with his cow
btw ßGød AWESOME 9x uptime!!
TF
<< Actually n0cmonkey the only reasons I've ever had to reboot my linux box is a new kernel... oh there's ONE other thing I've discovered that requires a reboot, but I didn't have to do it... when using an ide cd-burner in linux it emulates scsi with a line in lilo.conf that you have to reboot to enable... but that line was already in mine before I knew I needed it (one of the few blessings of mandrake
)/me will point out this thread to HI so he can put the smackdown on us all with his cowbtw ßGød AWESOME 9x uptime!!TF >>You're lucky. Of course with linux not having a decent make world you probably dont compile the entire system often do you
Hi
Some details of my 3 dual BP6 comps running on NT4
[Apr 22 02:04:01 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 251EEB20:70000000
[Apr 22 02:04:01 UTC] Summary: 14922 RC5 packets (183094*2^28 keys)
194.17:49:24.82 - [2.92 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 26 07:37:38 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 28D4E4A8:70000000
[Apr 26 07:37:38 UTC] Summary: 19128 RC5 packets (212285*2^28 keys)
209.16:12:12.79 - [3.14 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 26 08:15:57 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 28D547BC:70000000
[Apr 26 08:15:57 UTC] Summary: 19537 RC5 packets (209007*2^28 keys)
209.16:52:34.43 - [3.09 Mkeys/s]
Dual PII 333 running at work
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] 12 RC5 packets (84 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.03:19:30.00
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] 1 RC5 packet (16 work units) is in buff-out.rc5
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] *Break* Shutting down...
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Saved RC5 16*2^28 packet 20A3342A:70000000 (7.70% done)
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Saved RC5 16*2^28 packet 20A3378B:40000000 (81.40% done)
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Summary: 17956 RC5 packets (122789*2^28 keys)
203.23:58:23.26 - [1.86 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] 14 RC5 packets (116 work units) are in buff-in.rc5
A lot of the comps at work are over 100 days as we never shut them down.
Some details of my 3 dual BP6 comps running on NT4
[Apr 22 02:04:01 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 251EEB20:70000000
[Apr 22 02:04:01 UTC] Summary: 14922 RC5 packets (183094*2^28 keys)
194.17:49:24.82 - [2.92 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 26 07:37:38 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 28D4E4A8:70000000
[Apr 26 07:37:38 UTC] Summary: 19128 RC5 packets (212285*2^28 keys)
209.16:12:12.79 - [3.14 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 26 08:15:57 UTC] Loaded RC5 32*2^28 packet 28D547BC:70000000
[Apr 26 08:15:57 UTC] Summary: 19537 RC5 packets (209007*2^28 keys)
209.16:52:34.43 - [3.09 Mkeys/s]
Dual PII 333 running at work
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] 12 RC5 packets (84 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.03:19:30.00
[Apr 17 09:50:06 UTC] 1 RC5 packet (16 work units) is in buff-out.rc5
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] *Break* Shutting down...
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Saved RC5 16*2^28 packet 20A3342A:70000000 (7.70% done)
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Saved RC5 16*2^28 packet 20A3378B:40000000 (81.40% done)
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] Summary: 17956 RC5 packets (122789*2^28 keys)
203.23:58:23.26 - [1.86 Mkeys/s]
[Apr 17 09:55:59 UTC] 14 RC5 packets (116 work units) are in buff-in.rc5
A lot of the comps at work are over 100 days as we never shut them down.
I smelled some uptime's being thrown around in here and thought I may be able to compete.
I have a little P2-266 running linux and crunching RC5 for the federation that has been running for a little while:
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Completed RC5 packet D471DB5A:40000000 (2*2^28 keys)
0.00:12:36.07 - [710,080.98 keys/sec]
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Loaded RC5 1*2^28 packet D471DB5D:00000000
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Summary: 9261 RC5 packets (54813*2^28 keys)
260.07:44:38.07 - [653.59 kkeys/s]
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] 7 RC5 packets (19 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.01:53:22.00
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] 10 RC5 packets (29 work units) are in buff-out.rc5
.....10%.....20%.....30%.
That same box runs a pproxy too:
rc564 r=84983/85000, d=11/100, 22.2 Mkeys/sec, tot=5317796
ogr r=0/0, d=0/0, 4.0 Mnodes/sec, tot=1049 stubs
Status: Uptime: 190.02:02:29, 2 listeners, 0 uplinks
Status: 0 active clients (peak: 8, mean: 0.08)
It also has an uptime of:
[root@stats heavyiron]# uptime
8:35am up 306 days, 20:29, 2 users, load average: 1.21, 1.48, 1.31
I have another linux box with 186 days and running.
Here's a line out of my LAN's setiq:
SetiQueue 3.03.1.7 was last restarted on Mon 2001 Aug 13 8:59:59am (120 days 0 hr 26 min ago)
That's on an NT4 box.
This same box is also crunching for the federation:
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Completed RC5 packet 9F729D12:C0000000 (1*2^28 keys)
0.00:06:27.96 - [691,901.04 keys/sec]
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Loaded RC5 6*2^28 packet 9FF23DC8:A0000000
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Summary: 8143 RC5 packets (26639*2^28 keys)
119.23:03:26.70 - [689.80 kkeys/s]
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] 2 RC5 packets (3 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.00:19:15.00
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] 2 RC5 packets (3 work units) are in buff-out.rc5
It is a P2-266 also.
Notice how much better Linux does RC5 over NT4 on these two P2-266's?
Linux = [710,080.98 keys/sec]
NT4 = [691,901.04 keys/sec]
That's +18kkeys/sec
The only reason the overall rate is below the NT's box is because the linux box processes over a years worth of ppstats logs every 15 minutes, kinda pulls down on the available CPU cycles
I remember in IRC some time back, SyZ pulled out one or two linux boxes with 400+ days of uptime on 'em
I have a little P2-266 running linux and crunching RC5 for the federation that has been running for a little while:
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Completed RC5 packet D471DB5A:40000000 (2*2^28 keys)
0.00:12:36.07 - [710,080.98 keys/sec]
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Loaded RC5 1*2^28 packet D471DB5D:00000000
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Summary: 9261 RC5 packets (54813*2^28 keys)
260.07:44:38.07 - [653.59 kkeys/s]
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] 7 RC5 packets (19 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.01:53:22.00
[Dec 11 16:25:13 UTC] 10 RC5 packets (29 work units) are in buff-out.rc5
.....10%.....20%.....30%.
That same box runs a pproxy too:
rc564 r=84983/85000, d=11/100, 22.2 Mkeys/sec, tot=5317796
ogr r=0/0, d=0/0, 4.0 Mnodes/sec, tot=1049 stubs
Status: Uptime: 190.02:02:29, 2 listeners, 0 uplinks
Status: 0 active clients (peak: 8, mean: 0.08)
It also has an uptime of:
[root@stats heavyiron]# uptime
8:35am up 306 days, 20:29, 2 users, load average: 1.21, 1.48, 1.31
I have another linux box with 186 days and running.
Here's a line out of my LAN's setiq:
SetiQueue 3.03.1.7 was last restarted on Mon 2001 Aug 13 8:59:59am (120 days 0 hr 26 min ago)
That's on an NT4 box.
This same box is also crunching for the federation:
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Completed RC5 packet 9F729D12:C0000000 (1*2^28 keys)
0.00:06:27.96 - [691,901.04 keys/sec]
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Loaded RC5 6*2^28 packet 9FF23DC8:A0000000
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Summary: 8143 RC5 packets (26639*2^28 keys)
119.23:03:26.70 - [689.80 kkeys/s]
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] 2 RC5 packets (3 work units) remain in buff-in.rc5
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] Projected ideal time to completion: 0.00:19:15.00
[Dec 11 16:10:58 UTC] 2 RC5 packets (3 work units) are in buff-out.rc5
It is a P2-266 also.
Notice how much better Linux does RC5 over NT4 on these two P2-266's?
Linux = [710,080.98 keys/sec]
NT4 = [691,901.04 keys/sec]
That's +18kkeys/sec
The only reason the overall rate is below the NT's box is because the linux box processes over a years worth of ppstats logs every 15 minutes, kinda pulls down on the available CPU cycles
I remember in IRC some time back, SyZ pulled out one or two linux boxes with 400+ days of uptime on 'em
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 10K
-
-
Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 13K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
Facebook
Twitter