• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Who can save the GOP this election?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I still believe that this is all a ruse by the Republicans - put forth half a dozen nutcases/idiots, and let us find out all the exceptional reasons why they should never be President, then at the last possible moment, put forth a little known candidate who by contrast to the other morons, looks to be exceptional. But, do I think that they'll carefully vet that candidate this time? You Betcha!

It also reduces the time people have to dig things up.
 
Yeah i have a feeling they will throw Palin in at the last minute who may actually seem sane by that time compared to the current field and she will pander to the GOP base and get them all riled up for a fight against Obama.

I'm looking for a GOP to vote for. I'm a GOP voter waiting to happen. But I promise if Palin is the GOP nominee I will vote for Obama just so she isn't elected.
 
I'm looking for a GOP to vote for. I'm a GOP voter waiting to happen. But I promise if Palin is the GOP nominee I will vote for Obama just so she isn't elected.

So when did the GOP become the TOP?

\of course the better question - is the TOP worth saving....
 
Last edited:
Craig you do realize, of course, that high ranking Democrats are also 1%ers with the support of other 1%ers don't you? Christ almighty, your man two presidential elections ago was the 1% of the 1%. You're such a partisan hack Karl Rove would wince at your blind devotion.

Whoaaa wait a minute!!! You're trying to tell me that not all high ranking democrats are middle class!?!?!?!? 😱 I thought only republican high enders were rich???
 
I still believe that this is all a ruse by the Republicans - put forth half a dozen nutcases/idiots, and let us find out all the exceptional reasons why they should never be President, then at the last possible moment, put forth a little known candidate who by contrast to the other morons, looks to be exceptional. But, do I think that they'll carefully vet that candidate this time? You Betcha!

If we were in a thriller novel this might actually be true 🙂

Jon Huntsman seems less dim, nutty and flip-flopping than the rest of the candidates, but that might be why he's at the bottom of the pack. I haven't followed him too closely since he has no chance at the nomination, but what little I have read about him makes him seem like the best of the bunch.
 
I'm not that concerned with the Presidency, as long as the GOP maintains a large margin in the House and takes control of the Senate in 2012 we should have at least 2 more years of gridlock, probably 4.
 
Sadly the only people who are sane enough to have a chance at beating Obama (Johnson and Huntsman) don't even appear on the radar because they refuse to pander to the base.
If either were nominated I would vote for them over Obama, anyone else and the incumbent will likely get my vote.

No offense bro but Huntsman is a offshoring, cheap labor, disciple/enabler that has so many Americans as tax recipients instead of tax payers. No thanks. we need less smooth talkers from RNC/DLC and more pugnacious truth tellers like Dean imo.
 
Whoaaa wait a minute!!! You're trying to tell me that not all high ranking democrats are middle class!?!?!?!? 😱 I thought only republican high enders were rich???

Clue for you:

It's about policies that are plutocratic versus policies that are good for the public at large.

A wealthy person can support either, and a poorer person can support either.

When millionares come out for raising taxes on millionares, they may be wealthy but they're supporting the '99%' policies. And vice versa when poorer people like oppose them.
 
I lean conservative. But I'm logical about my opinions and I'm not a partisan hack and think the GOP is in trouble.

Who is going to save the GOP this year?

The current GOP offering of candidates for US President most pathetic group of all time. Let's give a break down.

Newt Gingrich - He will never be president and this guy is another senile old neo-conservative clown who puts his foot in his mouth every 5 minutes.

Herman Cain - One of the better candidates but his image from the start was tarnished as a nutty fringe candidate, which he could be.

Michele Bachmann - A Sarah Palin rehash? Yawn

Mitt Romney - Actually the most qualified candidate, but he will not get elected because he is a Mormon.

Rick Perry - A governor from Texas? No thanks, that didn't go so well last time.

I don't know enough to comment about the rest of the candidates except for Ron Paul, which I support, but he will not get elected because of his very out of the ordinary views. His son Rand though is going to be the future of the GOP part, IMO.

So GOPers, who is going to step up? This is the most disappointing group of candidates I have ever seen in my short adult life.

It would take a weak economy with high unemployment for someone like Ms Bachmann or Rick Perry to win the POTUS. There is still about 11 months before the election is locked in so there is plenty of time for something to happen.
 
Who is going to save the GOP this year?

"The naked Candiate".
Ok... its time for someone, man or woman, to run as "the naked candidate".
Preferably someone very good looking and in incredible shape.
Someone we would look forward to watch on TV.
Someone that could say anything they want, and no one would remember what they said.
Because...? Hey, that candidate is actually naked!

Debating Obama? Not one person would remember what Obama was talking about.
We would only remember "the naked candidate" after every televised debate.

Everyone else has had their shot at it. So why not "the naked candidate"?
 
No offense bro but Huntsman is a offshoring, cheap labor, disciple/enabler that has so many Americans as tax recipients instead of tax payers. No thanks. we need less smooth talkers from RNC/DLC and more pugnacious truth tellers like Dean imo.

I never said he wasn't. But of the "front runners" the GOP is offering he is the only one that isn't stupid, insane, a combination of the previous two or changes their political view whenever it is expedient.
 
You can't discount Ron Paul anymore. He's officially a front runner being #2 in polls... in front of Romney no less.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...owa_republican_presidential_primary-1588.html

I can discount him in the general even if he gets the nomination. Anyone but Romney and the GOP is in for an Obama landslide. The question is will they suck it in and field a mormon or turn into the middle east of US politics and let their religion stifle their success over and over again until they cease to matter.
 
I can discount him in the general even if he gets the nomination. Anyone but Romney and the GOP is in for an Obama landslide. The question is will they suck it in and field a mormon or turn into the middle east of US politics and let their religion stifle their success over and over again until they cease to matter.


Not true.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/27/news/la-pn-obama-paul-poll-20110927

It's absurd that people discount someone based on electability, all while they're asking for change and showing their frustration with the standard issue politician.
:|
 
2010 showed that the politicians of the "usual" and "electable" isn't necessarily the top quality we are looking for. The OWS crowd and the class warfare isn't going to help Obama, it will only divide us more and move independents away from him.

I am voting for anyone but Obama in our two party system. If he win's another term, we will be in for a wild ride...downward. The rabbit hole is even deeper, deeper than most realize, one step upward is better than three steps down.
 
Sarah Palin will make a fashionably late entrance and we'll see a nation of buffoons rally around her.

I am voting for anyone but Obama in our two party system. If he win's another term, we will be in for a wild ride...downward. The rabbit hole is even deeper, deeper than most realize, one step upward is better than three steps down.

I voted for Obama in 2008, but mccain won my state. So my vote didn't actually count toward electing Obama. Saying anybody but obama is kind of silly though. Look at the GOP field. Bunch of idiots letting things play out so they can have a nice vacation on the dime of donators... or go write a book and quit politics.

Obama showed us that if you think a new president is going to come in and simply fix things, you're wrong. That still holds true now... doesn't matter who gets elected in 2012. Many policies are irreversible and they are all owned by the same special interest groups.
 
Last edited:
I can discount him in the general even if he gets the nomination. Anyone but Romney and the GOP is in for an Obama landslide. The question is will they suck it in and field a mormon or turn into the middle east of US politics and let their religion stifle their success over and over again until they cease to matter.

I'm not American so forgive the possibly stupid question.

Why would him being a Mormon put him at such a disadvantage?
 
I'm not American so forgive the possibly stupid question.

Why would him being a Mormon put him at such a disadvantage?

The far right Christians have some very negative perceptions of mormonism; really, of anything except their own brand of christianity. The concern that they may vote for a third party instead of republican.

.
 
Back
Top