Originally posted by: brunswickite
judgeing by weight a Male African Elephant weights from 5 -7 tons
50 little people at 100 pounds each would be 5000 pounds or 2.5 tons
hmm i would say hte elephant
Originally posted by: Metalloid15
Originally posted by: brunswickite
judgeing by weight a Male African Elephant weights from 5 -7 tons
50 little people at 100 pounds each would be 5000 pounds or 2.5 tons
hmm i would say hte elephant
Yeah but a lot of that weight is in the huge trunk and the ivory tusks. That sure isn't gonna help.
Originally posted by: KingNothing
Originally posted by: Metalloid15
Originally posted by: brunswickite
judgeing by weight a Male African Elephant weights from 5 -7 tons
50 little people at 100 pounds each would be 5000 pounds or 2.5 tons
hmm i would say hte elephant
Yeah but a lot of that weight is in the huge trunk and the ivory tusks. That sure isn't gonna help.
From this site
Tusk weight: 10-60 kg
Trunk weight: 100-120 kg
Total weight: 4000-6000 kg
Proportion of tusk/trunk weight to total weight (averages: (35+110) / 5000): 29:1000
Human head weight: 5 kg
Average human weight: 68 kg
Proportion of human head weight to total weight: 73:1000
Therefore the human head, which arguably doesn't help a 150 pound human pull anything, would be a greater detriment than the elephant's trunk and tusks. I say the elephant.
Originally posted by: chiwawa626
Question ...at the airport is that little golf cart pulling the 747 or is the 747 pushing the golf cart?
Originally posted by: Metalloid15
Ok, so I am watching the Eagles vs. Falcons, and Fox has this commercial for this show called "Man vs. Beast" coming up. One of the events they are having will be who can pull an airplane further: An elephant or 50 little people? What do you guys think?
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I'm going to say the little people, in part because it's counterintuitive (and would therefore make for better TV), and partly because I have a feeling 100 little feet will get better traction than 4 very large feet. Not sure though.
Besides, ever watched midget pr0n? Those little guys sure have a lot of spunk.. (so to speak, that is..)
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I'm going to say the little people, in part because it's counterintuitive (and would therefore make for better TV), and partly because I have a feeling 100 little feet will get better traction than 4 very large feet. Not sure though.
Besides, ever watched midget pr0n? Those little guys sure have a lot of spunk.. (so to speak, that is..)
Originally posted by: Excelsior
elephant