Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
That's because they don't pay any real royalties to songwriters, performers, or record companies.Originally posted by: Stefan
AllOfMP3 says it's .02 US per 1mb of download...
so if a song is 5mb big, it would only cost 10 cents US to buy the song? and if the whole CD was 50mb, it would only cost 1 dollar?
Their claim to being legal is essentially based on being a "radio station" that is "broadcasting" the songs to you, so they only pay radio station listener fees instead of real sales royalties. They claim this is legal in Russia.
But hey, if you want to pay money for audio warez that's your choice.
Aren't you supposed to declare any liquor over a certain amount anyway? Seems like we were thinking about making a run to the duty free shop in Windsor once and we found out you could only legally bring back a very small amount legally before you had to pay the tax on it. If you stay longer, you can bring more, but it seems like no matter how long we stayed, we couldn't legally bring back the 4 cases we had intended to.How's the ride on the WAAAHMBULANCE? People are paying for a product just as you would buy liquor from a foreign country, get over it.
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
AllofMP3 is different than the file-sharing networks that are based or have defendants in the U.S. Most likely, the only reason why they haven't been sued yet is because U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over them. That doesn't mean it's legal. The RIAA would probably have to go through some international treaties (WTO or WIPO or something) to bring an action for copyright infringement.Originally posted by: aswedc
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
I was giving an example that you can always buy good from foreign countries and bring them back. Sometimes they're cheaper, sometimes more, but it's no different w/ the mp3s from Russia.Originally posted by: MrBond
Aren't you supposed to declare any liquor over a certain amount anyway? Seems like we were thinking about making a run to the duty free shop in Windsor once and we found out you could only legally bring back a very small amount legally before you had to pay the tax on it. If you stay longer, you can bring more, but it seems like no matter how long we stayed, we couldn't legally bring back the 4 cases we had intended to.How's the ride on the WAAAHMBULANCE? People are paying for a product just as you would buy liquor from a foreign country, get over it.
Except in this case you're bringing back a burned CD-R you got from a street vendor, or a HK pirate DVD.Originally posted by: SP33Demon
I was giving an example that you can always buy good from foreign countries and bring them back. Sometimes they're cheaper, sometimes more, but it's no different w/ the mp3s from Russia.Originally posted by: MrBond
Aren't you supposed to declare any liquor over a certain amount anyway? Seems like we were thinking about making a run to the duty free shop in Windsor once and we found out you could only legally bring back a very small amount legally before you had to pay the tax on it. If you stay longer, you can bring more, but it seems like no matter how long we stayed, we couldn't legally bring back the 4 cases we had intended to.How's the ride on the WAAAHMBULANCE? People are paying for a product just as you would buy liquor from a foreign country, get over it.
You raise an interesting point - I'd be inclined to agree with you here partially. As Capt.Obvious has said, there's little the RIAA can do to stop the use of AllofMP3. AFAIK, they're only suing those who SHARE music - not those who download it. Maybe I'm wrong, I haven't kept up with the latest round of lawsuits.Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.
Originally posted by: Grey
Rhapsody works for me .79 per song burned and unlimited listen on your PC for 9.99 a month.
LOL!!! :thumbsup::laugh:Originally posted by: SP33Demon
How's the ride on the WAAAHMBULANCE? People are paying for a product just as you would buy liquor from a foreign country, get over it.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
That's because they don't pay any real royalties to songwriters, performers, or record companies.Originally posted by: Stefan
AllOfMP3 says it's .02 US per 1mb of download...
so if a song is 5mb big, it would only cost 10 cents US to buy the song? and if the whole CD was 50mb, it would only cost 1 dollar?
Their claim to being legal is essentially based on being a "radio station" that is "broadcasting" the songs to you, so they only pay radio station listener fees instead of real sales royalties. They claim this is legal in Russia.
But hey, if you want to pay money for audio warez that's your choice.
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Bittorrent
- M4H
schwing!
Originally posted by: Sundog
For those of your who use AllofMP3.com, how do you pay???
Do you pay a Russian site via credit card? Too risky for me no matter how cheap.
Originally posted by: aswedc
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
Originally posted by: aswedc
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: aswedc
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
The RIAA can't go after this site as it's not based in the US. It's also not legal in the U.S. If you're going to get illegal mp3's, I don't know why you'd bother paying for them.
Originally posted by: arod
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: aswedc
Stupid. At this point to claim AllofMp3 is "probably illegal" is absurd. The RIAA has left no stone unturned in their crusade to stop music piracy. The fact that they haven't said one word about AllofMp3 leaves no doubt it is legal. Ethical is up to you to decide.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
allofmp3 = probably illegal, certainly unethical, but people here hope it's "legal enough" to protect you from the RIAA.
The truly legal services sell protected WMA (Napster, Real, Buy.com, ...) or AAC (iTunes). To get unprotected MP3 you must burn a CD then re-rip it.
I use Napster, but only to preview music. I want lossless FLAC so if I like it I buy the real CDs and rip.
The RIAA can't go after this site as it's not based in the US. It's also not legal in the U.S. If you're going to get illegal mp3's, I don't know why you'd bother paying for them.
And you know theyre looking for loop holes everyday.... the fact that they havent been able to do a damn thing about them yet speaks volumes as to wether they ever will be able to take them down (thus cant sue any users)
