Wow, an ex-wife. They've *NEVER* lied under oath. It doesn't fit the mold at all, especially considering that Breitbart is probably one of, if not the most, Israel/Jewish friendly website outside of Israel.
Not sure why you're trying to conflate being pro-Israel with being 'jewish friendly'. Once again you're just declaring everyone who accuses someone in Trump's crew of lying. How has that worked out for you in the past? Remember how badly you fucked up the Lewandowski thing?
No more in the case that somebody calling somebody an "uncle tom" is racist. Kinda like this...
http://blog.blackbusiness.org/2016/...=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#.WC3wWaIrL_R
I have no idea why you think that is relevant. By all means though please explain to me how having a 'black crime' section of your website is totally not racist.
I find it funny that you think that what you were reading were facts. How'd that 538 model turn out? Is he still the most statistically accurate guy out there?
The model turned out pretty well, actually. He gave Trump about a one in three chance of winning due to correctly calling the high variance in the polls. The model is a probabilistic one, so the idea of an event occuring that a probabilistic model gives a 1 in 3 chance of as a sign of failure seems awfully stupid. I don't think you should try to discuss statistics as you don't understand them.
Didn't he also predict the Rs would lose the Senate? Ohh, wait, Garbage In, Garbage Out. How quaint.
Forest through the trees moron, forest through the trees.
No, the model predicted the Senate was a toss-up and 51 seats for the Republicans was right around the height of the probability distribution. Don't think that I didn't notice the irony of you calling someone else a moron while clearly showing you didn't understand what you were criticizing.