Whitehouse Transition

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,967
55,358
136
Wow, an ex-wife. They've *NEVER* lied under oath. It doesn't fit the mold at all, especially considering that Breitbart is probably one of, if not the most, Israel/Jewish friendly website outside of Israel.

Not sure why you're trying to conflate being pro-Israel with being 'jewish friendly'. Once again you're just declaring everyone who accuses someone in Trump's crew of lying. How has that worked out for you in the past? Remember how badly you fucked up the Lewandowski thing?

No more in the case that somebody calling somebody an "uncle tom" is racist. Kinda like this...
http://blog.blackbusiness.org/2016/...=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#.WC3wWaIrL_R

I have no idea why you think that is relevant. By all means though please explain to me how having a 'black crime' section of your website is totally not racist.

I find it funny that you think that what you were reading were facts. How'd that 538 model turn out? Is he still the most statistically accurate guy out there?

The model turned out pretty well, actually. He gave Trump about a one in three chance of winning due to correctly calling the high variance in the polls. The model is a probabilistic one, so the idea of an event occuring that a probabilistic model gives a 1 in 3 chance of as a sign of failure seems awfully stupid. I don't think you should try to discuss statistics as you don't understand them.

Didn't he also predict the Rs would lose the Senate? Ohh, wait, Garbage In, Garbage Out. How quaint.

Forest through the trees moron, forest through the trees.

No, the model predicted the Senate was a toss-up and 51 seats for the Republicans was right around the height of the probability distribution. Don't think that I didn't notice the irony of you calling someone else a moron while clearly showing you didn't understand what you were criticizing.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Not sure why you're trying to conflate being pro-Israel with being 'jewish friendly'. Once again you're just declaring everyone who accuses someone in Trump's crew of lying. How has that worked out for you in the past? Remember how badly you fucked up the Lewandowski thing?
Didn't fuck it up at all. He wasn't charged, there was no evidence he did anything, and she didn't even file a civil claim. I won again.

I have no idea why you think that is relevant. By all means though please explain to me how having a 'black crime' section of your website is totally not racist.
Don't really know the website, saw the headline elsewhere and linked it there. But hey, keep on *ist and *ism. My side is winning on that.

The model turned out pretty well, actually. He gave Trump about a one in three chance of winning due to correctly calling the high variance in the polls. The model is a probabilistic one, so the idea of an event occuring that a probabilistic model gives a 1 in 3 chance of as a sign of failure seems awfully stupid. I don't think you should try to discuss statistics as you don't understand them.
Had nate adjusted accordingly and eliminated poor samples, Trump would have been far higher, as evidenced by the clobbering. But hey, okay.

No, the model predicted the Senate was a toss-up and 51 seats for the Republicans was right around the height of the probability distribution. Don't think that I didn't notice the irony of you calling someone else a moron while clearly showing you didn't understand what you were criticizing.

Yeah, that's why I was right about Brexit, the primaries, and now this. But hey, you keep on keepin on. The world needs suckers and you're just ripe for the picking.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,967
55,358
136
Didn't fuck it up at all. He wasn't charged, there was no evidence he did anything, and she didn't even file a civil claim. I won again.

Uhmm, there was in fact video and audio evidence that he did something. No sane person is still trying to argue he didn't. Last I heard you had declared the audio some sort of forgery as part of a conspiracy against him, which was absolutely fucking hilarious. So no, I was right and you were wrong.

Don't really know the website, saw the headline elsewhere and linked it there. But hey, keep on *ist and *ism. My side is winning on that.

Not sure how this is relevant to Bannon having a 'black crime' section of his website. Care to address that?

Had nate adjusted accordingly and eliminated poor samples, Trump would have been far higher, as evidenced by the clobbering. But hey, okay.

Ah yes, the 'clobbering' where Trump lost by what looks like about 2 million votes. I'm sure you were totally predicting that.

I don't even know what you mean by eliminating poor samples, but I do know that you're too incompetent when it comes to statistics to make that judgment.

Yeah, that's why I was right about Brexit, the primaries, and now this. But hey, you keep on keepin on.

The polls listed Brexit as a toss up and listed Trump as the likely winner of the primaries. What reality are you living in? I'm starting to lose track of all the basic errors you're making about polling and election models. I hope the people at your company keep you far, far away from anything having to do with statistics or math.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Uhmm, there was in fact video and audio evidence that he did something. No sane person is still trying to argue he didn't. Last I heard you had declared the audio some sort of forgery as part of a conspiracy against him, which was absolutely fucking hilarious. So no, I was right and you were wrong.
I have yet to see such evidence, perhaps you can show me where he did what she said.

Not sure how this is relevant to Bannon having a 'black crime' section of his website. Care to address that?
Whats wrong with it? Does it report fake stuff?

Maybe they should report this.

http://www.therebel.media/debunking_white_privilege_the_economic_reality


Ah yes, the 'clobbering' where Trump lost by what looks like about 2 million votes. I'm sure you were totally predicting that.

I don't even know what you mean by eliminating poor samples, but I do know that you're too incompetent when it comes to statistics to make that judgment.
Wow, 2.9mm Mexifornia votes. Ohh noes.

The polls listed Brexit as a toss up and listed Trump as the likely winner of the primaries. What reality are you living in? I'm starting to lose track of all the basic errors you're making about polling and election models. I hope the people at your company keep you far, far away from anything having to do with statistics or math.

lol.
 
Last edited:

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,761
11,388
136
Had nate adjusted accordingly and eliminated poor samples, Trump would have been far higher, as evidenced by the clobbering. But hey, okay.

Which "poor samples" should he have removed? I think this statement alone is proof that you don't quite grasp what 538 does. Like fsky said, you really shouldn't talk about things you don't understand.

Clobbering? I don't think that word means what you think it means.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Which "poor samples" should he have removed? Clobbering? I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Ohh, it certainly means that. How are those state governorships and legislatures going. Entire country is being redpilled. Good.

Weren't you the fuckstick giving me so much shit before the election, saying how wrong I was? Huh, yeah, you were.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,761
11,388
136
Ohh, it certainly means that. How are those state governorships and legislatures going. Entire country is being redpilled. Good.

Weren't you the fuckstick giving me so much shit before the election, saying how wrong I was? Huh, yeah, you were.

Rofl. Thump your chest all you want about what you perceive as a mandate in the election. It was razor thin. And you actually lost seats in congress.

Broken clock and all ...
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Rofl. Thump your chest all you want about what you perceive as a mandate in the election. It was razor thin. And you actually lost seats in congress.

Broken clock and all ...

Still retained majority. Next up, supreme court.

Hey, did you hear Apple is talking about bringing iPhone production here?

More winning.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,967
55,358
136
I have yet to see such evidence, perhaps you can show me where he did what she said.

Oh my fucking god. Go look it up yourself, it's all over the place.

Whats wrong with it? Does it report fake stuff?

You're right, having a section explicitly designated to report on criminal activity of a specific racial minority could only be racist if it reported false things.

wut.

Wow, 2.9mm Mexifornia votes. Ohh noes.

lol.

Thanks for confirming you have no clue what you're talking about.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,761
11,388
136
Still retained majority. Next up, supreme court.

Hey, did you hear Apple is talking about bringing iPhone production here?

More winning.

Like you admitted before, you won't accept facts that don't fit your beliefs.

Hope you like $8000 iphones ...
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Oh my fucking god. Go look it up yourself, it's all over the place.



You're right, having a section explicitly designated to report on criminal activity of a specific racial minority could only be racist if it reported false things.

wut.



Thanks for confirming you have no clue what you're talking about.

It's nowhere other than her and Ben Shapiro's mind. Which are fucked. So yeah, done. I was right, no charges, no civil, nothing. You fucking failed.

As long as it is fact, who cares?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Like you admitted before, you won't accept facts that don't fit your beliefs.

Hope you like $8000 iphones ...

Okay, so let's lay this out now. You want to bet on this? Considering how right I have been the last year and how fucked your world perception is, you sure you want to take that?
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
And if anything goes wrong we can mockingly say "But Obama!" for the next 4-8 years.

I'm a little late to the party here but thought this was a particularly delicious article written a few days before the election...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nate-silver-election-forecast_us_581e1c33e4b0d9ce6fbc6f7f

Nate Silver Is Unskewing Polls — All Of Them — In Trump’s Direction

The vaunted 538 election forecaster is putting his thumb on the scales.


"By monkeying around with the numbers like this, Silver is making a mockery of the very forecasting industry that he popularized."

HuffPo...gotta love them!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,967
55,358
136
It's nowhere other than her and Ben Shapiro's mind. Which are fucked. So yeah, done. I was right, no charges, no civil, nothing. You fucking failed.

As long as it is fact, who cares?

Also the video tape and the audio tape, but you know.

Are you still claiming the latter is a forgery, by the way? Seriously, that was hilarious.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,761
11,388
136
Okay, so let's lay this out now. You want to bet on this? Considering how right I have been the last year and how fucked your world perception is, you sure you want to take that?

You mean like the time you were sure NYPD found classified emails on Weiner's laptop and forced the DoJ to re-open the email server investigation??? Yeah, you were spot on about that one. :rolleyes:
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
How about the one where he complained about there being too many Hanukkah books in a school he was looking at? Also, he edited a website that routinely trafficked in racist and anti Semitic language and editors are responsible for what their organizations put out.

It's interesting to see the right wing that accused Obama of racism for years embrace a guy like this, wouldn't you agree?

"Interesting" certainly is one way to describe it..
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,074
12,292
136
what a diverse group.


1117-mike-pence-selfie-twitter-8.jpg
All I can think of is mayonnaise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundforbjt

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Provide a study. Last post I made showing how stupid your belief on this was, you admitted to not even reading what I said, and linked to the same data that I used to show how stupid your position was.

So, if you have a study provide it. I already provided sources for why you are wrong.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm

Not sure how useful this is for someone who has a history of pontificating on studies they can't read. They're likely incapable of understanding the level of their incompetence.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
Yeah, it's like this "BANNON IS A RACIST ANTI-SEMITIC BAD GUY, BECAUSE REASONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!". Then when you ask for any specific examples, nobody can provide a single one. Nothing. It's fucking pathetic.
I'm sure you'll dismiss these are misinterpretations of his words
but fvck you anyway
https://www.bustle.com/articles/195...gest-he-doesnt-think-theres-a-diversity-issue
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/us/politics/stephen-bannon-breitbart-words.html?_r=0
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
Ah yes, the 'clobbering' where Trump lost by what looks like about 2 million votes. I'm sure you were totally predicting that.
He didn't lose anything but an irrelevant metric that only losers care about. Trump beat her handily where it counted. The most contested voters, Trump won.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
You believing anything the leftist media tells you. Fake News at 11.

It wasn't until 12/1/08 that Obama announced his first cabinet pick (Geithner) and wasn't until 20 days later that he had another.

So yeah, go fuck yourself.

Yeah, because obviously that is the only thing he isn't prepared for. o_O The presidential transition ain't the only thing he's woefully unprepared for and bound to bungle. The rust belt's last gasp ain't going to be pretty.