The unlawful use of violence and intimidation to achieve political goals. Since we already know that anarchists and other fringe left groups are contributing to the chaos, my statement stands. I’m going to go for a jog. That should give you plenty of time to move the goal posts.
You stated :
“Anyone provoking rioting and looting or looking to force a response from police”
- Rioting.
- Looting.
- Force response from the police.
From the definition of
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation to achieve political goals."
None of those three qualifies. Its not up for debate, dont need to respond to it, its a fact as gravity is to mass.
You are wrong.
Goalposts. You then, and I am quoting you from above, go on to expand with :
"Since we already know that anarchists and other fringe left groups are contributing to the chaos"
- Yea, anarchists usually have a political motive.
- Yea, antifa usually have a political motive.
- Yea, neo nazis usually have a political motive.
- Yea, KKK usually have a political motive
- Yea, white supremacy groups usually have a political motive.
- And for some fucked up reason it seems like some cops are undercover with alternative political motives.
So for THOSE groups, engaging in rioting, looting and confronting the authorities is some level of terrorism. Yes.
BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU SAID BUCK. you should keep a memo on where you put your own goalposts down.
Anyway, I am sure we can agree there is levels of terror right? I mean .. twin towers, am I right? I mean, they are not exactly al-qaeda material are they?
You sure you still wanna label them terrorists?
Absolutely sure?
Cause, the white supremacists fuckers, the cops posing as antifas and setting shit on fire to get the show going, THOSE fuckers are the closest god damn thing you come to a terrorist in this scenario.
And you fucking know it. Just fucking stop.