White? Dont teach here. Op Updated to address false 'racist' labal

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Dec 10, 2005
28,665
13,807
136
The article said a small group was protesting. How many are really in this group? A small group was also protesting the Sriracha plant in California, and that turned put to be only a handful of people (eg only 2 people were responsible for filing all the complaints with the city council.)
 
Last edited:
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
That article is a perfect example of a modern progressive racist mindset, the same mindset we get from a vocal minority here on these forums.


It is ALL of our history. It can be taught by anyone.

To explicitly say they must hire a black/mexican/burnt umber to teach cultural history is no different than staying you need an medium ivory to teach a management class. Both ideas are equally racist, and based on a societal thought process that completely ended by the 80's.


But, like many modern progressive racists, a select few in our society just want to keep that racism train going, let's inject some personal opinions, let's relay what these people were taught by racist parents/grandparents on to modern children.




These kids were born around 2005. There is no need to teach anybody "special" history. All that does is show the kids that they're different, and reinforce the false notion that modern >2000 era society treats people based on skin color.

The only people who even care about skin color nowadays are modern progressive racists.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
The article said a small group was protesting. How many are really in this group? A small group was also protesting the Siriacha (sp?) plant in California, and that turned put to be only a handful of people (eg only 2 people were responsible for filing all the complaints with the city council.)


Just like here on the forums, you have a very small percentage who shriek the loudest thus are noticed the most.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
So basically if someone says something which makes us butt-hurt we should go run and tattle to our mommy? :rolleyes:


It's ATPN. If you get offended and are incapable of logical debate you must then paint the person you're debating with out to be a racist.
 

Pray To Jesus

Diamond Member
Mar 14, 2011
3,622
0
0
I wholly and totally reject your self-perceived superiority. You are among the worst of the breed of progressives and as such your words are meaningless prog-babble. Your opinions have no value.

Prog babble infects the feeble minded and turns them into new Prog.

Progs, if not countered, like a deadly virus spreads quickly. It won't take long for the Proged society to die a painful, drawn-out death.
 

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
The [b<only people[/b] who even care about skin color nowadays are modern progressive racists.
Well and the OP, plus his defenders such as yourself.

You are going out of your way to make this a partisan political issue.

Racism of the sort found by the OP ought to have no partisan political barriers in the USA.

They, what your post argues, is of the right in the USA agreeing with racist xenophobic incitements for "them [Blacks and Hispanics] to go back to where they came from." Is that your partisan position?

SpaciallyAware, do you therefore agree and support the racism of the OP?
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
Prog babble infects the feeble minded and turns them into new Prog.

Progs, if not countered, like a deadly virus spreads quickly. It won't take long for the Proged society to die a painful, drawn-out death.


Thankfully the modern progressive disease has a cure. It diminishes with age and wisdom.
 

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
Prog babble infects the feeble minded and turns them into new Prog.
The bloody racists of this forum come out to defend overt racism by stupidly attacking those who correctly identify it.

The immorally endemic culture of this forum regularly dissapoints.
 

RandomWords

Senior member
Jun 11, 2014
633
5
81
That article is a perfect example of a modern progressive racist mindset, the same mindset we get from a vocal minority here on these forums. It is ALL of our history. It can be taught by anyone. To explicitly say they must hire a black/mexican/burnt umber to teach cultural history is no different than staying you need an medium ivory to teach a management class. Both ideas are equally racist, and based on a societal thought process that completely ended by the 80's. But, like many modern progressive racists, a select few in our society just want to keep that racism train going, let's inject some personal opinions, let's relay what these people were taught by racist parents/grandparents on to modern children. These kids were born around 2005. There is no need to teach anybody "special" history. All that does is show the kids that they're different, and reinforce the false notion that modern >2000 era society treats people based on skin color. The only people who even care about skin color nowadays are modern progressive racists.

This. Any history teacher of any color of skin can teach a history course - regardless of what the topic of that history course is... that goes for any other school courses as well. What next - we can't have white or black people teaching Spanish?
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
The bloody racists of this forum come out to defend overt racism by stupidly attacking those who correctly identify it.

The immorally endemic culture of this forum regularly dissapoints.


It is a select few people, I would guess 5-6, who act this way.


But... They are very emotional and vocal, thus it seems more prevalent than it is.
 

Whiskey16

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2011
1,338
5
76
It's ATPN. If you get offended and are incapable of logical debate....
I am one of the few who directly addressed every point of the OP plus referenced the article in question.

I posted questions for the OP and points for his clarrification. That's how discussion and debate should be.

Your personal issue is against one daring to use constructive reason to correctly identify and chastice racism. Why? You likely support and chose to defend the racism of the OP.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
How is the use of "They" racist here? The people who are requesting that the school hire someone else, is based completely off of someones race, and not their talents.

They seems to be the correct word for the people who make up the group that has the issue.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
I am one of the few who directly addressed every point of the OP plus referenced the article in question.

I posted questions for the OP and points for his clarrification. That's how discussion and debate should be.

Your personal issue is against one daring to use constructive reason to correctly identify and chastice racism. Why? You likely support and chose to defend the racism of the OP.
Perfect example of "constructive reason"! :rolleyes:
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
This. Any history teacher of any color of skin can teach a history course - regardless of what the topic of that history course is... that goes for any other school courses as well. What next - we can't have white or black people teaching Spanish?

i agree. this "news" is silly. the school should tell them go pound sand. The teacher has the qualifications so he is able to teach it. it amazes me that people think the color of the skin matters.

haha. Racism is okay, as long as it's directed at the appropriate group.

truth. sad part of politics and news.
 

Pray To Jesus

Diamond Member
Mar 14, 2011
3,622
0
0
The bloody racists of this forum come out to defend overt racism by stupidly attacking those who correctly identify it.

The immorally endemic culture of this forum regularly dissapoints.

Prog babble infects the feeble minded and turns them into new Progs.

I am certain that progs don't believe in absolute moral standards.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,345
32,967
136
exactly. so i guess they should fire every black history teacher (except for African-American, Latino and Southeast Asian studies).


I didn't know that the color of your skin dictated what history you could teach! Thanks karen!
Hey, another guy who doesn't think black people were a part of American History.
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
a small group of concerned citizens led by Rev. Karen Crozier met in front of the school on Church Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard

Figures that the racist complainers are religious.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
The article said a small group was protesting. How many are really in this group? A small group was also protesting the Sriracha plant in California, and that turned put to be only a handful of people (eg only 2 people were responsible for filing all the complaints with the city council.)

Based on this photo, there were 4 leaders at the press conference.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/29/black-leaders-in-fresno-oppose-white-cultural-studies-teacher/

YouTube-screenshot-thefresnobee.jpg
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
Why don't you tell us all about your burnt umber theory again.



You modern progressives use the terms black and white not to define skin color, but to define us culturally.

My opinion is that we shouldn't be dividing these lines between ourselves. We are all the same, and should treat each other equally rather than look for excuses to ask for special treatment.


You and the rest of the race brigaiders constantly look for ways to divide people - trying to figure out what makes us different, and how you can profit or take advantage of the perceived differences. You all use the terms "white" and "black" as a way to define cultures, which I think is a shame and incredibly racist. Medium ivory people can follow "black" culture. Burnt umber people can follow "white" cultures. We don't live in an era divided between "blacks" and "whites" (even though that's what you modern progressives want)


Skin color is a non-factor in regards to culture. I refuse to use the divisive terms of black and white, I think it's ridiculous and out of place in our post-cosby society.



To me, the only difference is physical. So it makes more sense to call it like it is, which is an actual skin color. Nobody is physically black nor white. Burnt umber and medium ivory are far more accurate terms.
 
Last edited: